Using Social Media to Reinforce Environmental Learning and Action Taking for School Students

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2, 83 - 96, 30.11.2015

Alan Warner Chris Eames Robyn Irvıng

https://doi.org/10.18497/iejee-green.53452

Cited By: 4

Öz

Environmental experiences often engage learners and create an intention to act, which is then not followed through once the learner is removed from the environment.  This study utilized an exploratory, interpretive framework with younger primary school classes to investigate if transfer of learning from field trip experiences in and about the environment into action for the environment could be reinforced by social media interaction between the environmental educator and the class through a blog. Field observations, teacher interviews, student focus groups and analyses of students’ work indicated that the blogs were well-received by teachers and students and did foster continued student engagement. The social media interaction only facilitated student action-taking if there was a shared philosophy between the environmental educator and the teacher with respect to the aims of the experiences and the value of action-taking. The importance of teacher attitudes in determining the value of social media is discussed as well as the benefit of dialogue among environmental educators and classroom teachers with respect to the philosophy of environmental learning experiences.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Social media, environmental learning, action competence

Kaynakça

• Agyeman, J. (2006). Action, experience, behaviour and technology: Why it's just not the same?
• Environmental Education Research, 12(3-4), 513-522. Ballantyne, R., Anderson, D., & Packer, J. (2010). Exploring the impact of integrated fieldwork, reflective and metacognitive experiences on student environmental learning outcomes. Australian Journal of
• Environmental Education, 26, 47-64. Ballantyne, R., Fien, J., & Packer, J. (2001). School environmental education programme impacts upon student and family learning: A case study analysis. Environmental Education Research, 7(1), 23-37.
• Ballantyne, R., & Packer, J. (2011). Using tourism free-choice learning experiences to promote environmentally sustainable behaviour: The role of post-visit ‘action resources’. Environmental
• Education Research, 17(2), 201-215. Birdsall, S. (2010). Empowering students to act: Learning about, through and from the nature of action. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 26, 65-84.
• Bogeholz, S. (2006). Nature experience and its importance for environmental knowledge, values and action: Recent German empirical contributions. Environmental Education Research, 12(1), 65-84.
• Boyes, M. (2000). The place of outdoor education in the health and physical education curriculum.
• Journal of Physical Education New Zealand, 33(2), 75-88. Gruenewald, D. A. (2003). The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place. Educational Researcher, 32(3), 3-12.
• Felix, L., & Johnson, B. (2013). Back in the classroom: Teacher follow-through after an earth education program. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 12(3), 187-196.
• Jensen, B. B., & Schnack, K. (1997). The action competence approach in environmental education.
• Environmental Education Research, 3(2), 163-179. Kola-Olusanya, A. (2005). Free-choice environmental education: Understanding where children learn outside of school. Environmental Education Research, 11(3), 297-307.
• Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development.
• Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behaviour? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239-260.
• Lucas, A. (1979). Environment and environmental education: Conceptual issues and curriculum implications. Sydney: Australia International Press and Publications.
• Mackey, G. (2012). To know, to decide, to act: The young child’s right to participate in action for the environment. Environmental Education Research, 18(4), 473-484.
• Rennie, L. J., & McClafferty, T. P. (1996). Science centres and science learning. Studies in science education, 27, 53-98.
• Rickinson, M. (2001). Learners and learning in environmental education: A critical review of the evidence. Environmental Education Research, 7(3), 207-320.
• Robelia, B. A., Greenhow, C., & Burton, L. (2011). Environmental learning in online social networks:
• Adopting environmentally responsible behaviors. Environmental Education Research, 17(4), 553-575. Russo, A., Watkins, J., & Groundwater-Smith, S. (2009). The impact of social media on informal learning in museums. Educational Media International, 46(2), 153-166.
• Sheko, T. (2011). Using blogs to transform learning and teaching. The Journal for the School
• Information Professional, 14 (2), 5-7. Smith, G. A. (2007). Place-based education: Breaking through the constraining regularities of public school. Environmental Education Research, 13(2), 189-207.
• Storksdieck, M., Ellenbogen, K., & Heimlich, J. E. (2005). Changing minds? Reassessing outcomes in free-choice environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 11(3), 353-369.
• Te Kete Ipurangi. (2012). Learning experiences outside the classroom Retrieved 21 August, 2012, from http://eotc.tki.org.nz/LEOTC-home
• Tsevreni, I. (2011). Towards an environmental education without scientific knowledge: An attempt to create an action model based on children's experiences, emotions and perceptions about their environment. Environmental Education Research, 17(1), 53-67.
• Wolbers, J. (2007). Get into blogging New Zealand Science Teacher(115), 39.
• Yocco, V., Danter, E. H., Heimlich, J. E., Dunckel, B. A., & Myers, C. (2011). Exploring use of new media in environmental education contexts: Introducing visitors’ technology use in zoos model. Environmental
• Education Research, 17(6), 801-814. Zeppel, H. (2008). Education and conservation benefits of marine wildlife tours: Developing free- choice learning experiences. Journal of Environmental Education, 39(3), 3-18.
• Öğrencilerin Çevresel Öğrenme ve Eyleme Geçmelerini Pekiştirmede Sosyal Medyanın Kullanımı