nsani Kalkınma Endekslerine Göre Türk Keneşi Ülkelerinin Gelişim Perspektifi

Öz

1990 yılı itibariyle Birleşmiş Milletler Kalkınma Programı UNDP tarafından ‘İnsani Kalkınma Endeksi’ hazırlanarak kalkınma kavramı insan odaklı ölçülmeye çalışılmıştır. Felsefi temelinde Amartya Sen’in ‘Özgürlükle Kalkınma Teorisi’nde geliştirdiği ‘capability yaklaşımı’ olan İnsani Kalkınma Endeksi, 1990’dan bu yana Birleşmiş Milletler Kalkınma Programı tarafından hazırlanan İnsani Kalkınma Raporlarında ülkelerin yaşam kalitesi ve standardını değerlendiren bir ölçüm birimi olarak yer almaktadır. ‘Kalkınma hakkı’ perspektifinden hareketle sistematize edilen bu çalışmada da, Türk Keneşi Konseyi Ülkelerinin İnsani Kalkınma Endekslerine göre yöneylemlerinin saptanması amaçlanmıştır. Bu doğrultuda, Türk dili konuşan ülkeler arasında işbirliğini geliştirmek amacıyla 2009 yılında kurulan Türk Keneşi’nin kurucu üyeleri Türkiye, Azerbaycan, Kazakistan ve Kırgızistan’ın kalkınma ivmeleri istatistiki betimsel analize tabi tutulacak ve elde edilecek ‘HDI Trendi’ne göre de insani kalkınma politikaları tartışmaya açılacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Özgürlükle kalkınma teorisi, insani kalkınma endeksi, Türk Keneşi Ülkeleri.

Development Perspectives of Turkish-Speaking Contries Cooperation Council According to Human Development Indices

Öz

The 'Human Development Index' was prepared by the United Nations Development Program UNDP in 1990, and the concept of development was tried to be measured with human focus. On the philosophical basis of the Human Development Index is Amartya Sen's 'Capability Approach' developed by 'Development as Freedom Theory'. Since 1990, INDEX has been included in the Human Development Reports prepared by the United Nations Development Program as a measurement unit evaluating countries' quality of life and standard. In this work systematicized from the perspective of 'right to development', it was aimed to determine the direction of the Turkishspeaking Countries Cooperation Council Turkish Council according to the ‘Human Development Index’. In this context, The Turkish Council was established in 2009 to develop cooperation between Turkish-speaking countries. The founding members of the Council of Turkey, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan's development momentum statistics will be subjected to descriptive analysis and the human development policies will be discussed according to the obtained 'HDI Trend'.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Development as freedom theory, human development index, Turkish-Speaking Contries Cooperation Counci

Kaynakça

1. Akçay, E. (2012). Bir Dış Politika Enstrümanı Olarak Türk Dış Yardımları (Turkish Foreign Aids as a Foreign Policy Instrument). Ankara: Tur- gut Ozal University Publications
2. Akyıldız F. (2011). “Binyıl Kalkınma Hedefleri, İnsan Hakları ve De- mokrasi (Millennium Development
3. Goals, Human Rights and Democracy)”, Journal of Süleyman Demirel University Institute of Social Sciences, Number 14, UNDP Raports 2000, 2007, 2008
4. Arı, T. (2004). Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorileri: Çatışma, Hegemonya, İşbirliği (International Relations Theories: Conflict, Hegemony, Cooperation), Is- tanbul: Alfa Publication
5. Aristoteles (2007). Nikomakhos’a Etik (Ethics in Nikomakhos), Trans. S. Babur, Ankara: BilgeSu Publishing
6. Boz, Ç. (2012). “Adam Smith and Amartya Sen”, Ankara: Gazi Univer- sity Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences Journal 14/3, 71-96
7. Çukurçayır, S. ve Tezcan, K. (2011). “ Demokratikleşme ve Ekonomik Kalkınma: Etkileşim Analizi (Democratization and Economic Deve- lopment: Interaction Analysis)”, Journal of Knowledge Economy and Management, Cilt VI, Sayı II
8. Deneulin, S. (2010). “Development and the limits of Amartya Sen’s The Idea of Justice”, Oxford Development Studies, Vol 38, Issue 3, 383-8.

9. Durğun, S. (2013). “Amartya Sen: Adalte Küresel Bir Bakış (Amartya Sen: A Global View to Justice)”, ETHOS: Dialogues in Philosophy and Social Sciences, Ocak/January 2013, 6(1), 95-123
10. Fırat, E. ve Aydın, A. (2015). “İnsani Kalkınma Endeksine Göre Türki- ye’nin Eğitim Endeksi Göstergelerinin OECD Ülkeleri İle Karşı- laştırılması (Turkey's Education Index by the Human Develop- ment Index Comparison of Indicators with OECD Countries) ", EU Economics and Administrative Sciences The Journal of Social Eco- nomic Research, Year 15, Issue 29
11. Gürses, D. (2009). “İnsani Gelişme ve Türkiye (Human Development And Turkey)”, BÜ SBED, Cilt 12, Sayı 21
12. Hick, R. (2014). “Poverty as Capability Deprivation: Conceptualising and Measuring Poverty in Contemporary Europe”, European Jour- nal of Sociology, 55, 3, 295 – 323.
13. Işık, R. (2006), Underdevelopment Issue Democracy Crisis and Under- developed Democracies According to the Human Development Index, Unpublished Master's Thesis, Konya Selçuk University So- cial Sciences Institute
14. İnsel, A. (2000). “Özgürlük Etiği Karşısında İktisat Kuramı: Amartya Sen’in Etik İktisat Öğretisi (The Theory of Economics Against Et- hics of Freedom: Amartya Sen's Ethical Economics Teaching)" So- ciety and Science, Issue.86
15. Kirmanoğlu, H. (2005). “Amartya Sen’in Özgürlük ve Kalkınma Dü- şüncelerine Bir Bakış (A Look at Amartya Sen's Ideas of Freedom and Development)", I.U. Faculty of Economics, Finance Research Center Conference
16. Metin, B. (2014). “Yoksullukla Mücadeleye İnsan Hakları Açısından Bakmak: Amartya Sen’in Kapasite (Capability) Yaklaşımı Teme- linde Bir Değerlendirme”( Looking at The Fight Against Poverty in Terms of Human Tights: Amartya Sen An Assessment Based on the Capability Approach ), E-Journal of Yasar University, 9(36), 6261- 6380
17. Mill, J. S. (2012). Özgürlük Üstüne (On Freedom), (Translated by Dostel M.O.), Ankara: Liberte Publications
18. Nussbaum, M. C. (2001). Women And Human Development (The Capabili- ties Approach), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 312ss.
19. Nussbaum, M. C. and Sen, Amartya (2003). Quality of Life, Oxford: Clarendon Press (1993)
20. Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating Capabilities, The Human Development Aproach. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press
21. Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory Of Justice, London: Harvard University Press
22. Sen, A. (1999a). Development as Freedom, Oxford, Oxford University Press
23. Sen, A. (1999b). “Democracy as a Universal Value”, Journal of Democ- racy,Vol 10,Issue, 3, 3-17
24. Sen, A. (2010). Identity and Violence. The Illusion of Destiny, Cambrige: Penguin Book
25. Sen, A. (2004). Özgürlükle Kalkınma (Development as Freedom). Çev. Ya- vuz Alogan. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yay.
26. Sen, A. (2009). The Idea Of Justice. Cambridge- Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harward University Press
27. Srivastav, D. S. (2016). “Rawls’s Theory Of Justice Through Amartya Sen’s Idea”, ILI Law Review, 151-160
28. Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A. ve Fitoussi, J.P. (2009). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, Paris, http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/ 20.02.2017
29. Şeker, F. (2009). “Amartya Sen’in Kapasite Yaklaşımı (Amartya Sen's Capacity Approach) ", Journal of EU Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Number 32
30. Taban, S. ve Kar, M. (2014). Kalkınma Ekonomisi (Development Econo- mics), 1st Edition, Istanbul: Ekin Publishing
31. Yavaşgel, E. (2014). Özgürlüğün Siyaseti (Politics of Freedom), İstanbul: Derin Publishing
32. http://www.mfa.gov.tr/15.03.2018
33. http://www.oecd.org/dac / 18.03.2018
34. http://www.un.org/19.03.2018
35. http://tr.undp.org/ 19.03.2018
36. http://hdr.undp.org/2000/7/8/15/16_human_development_report/ 21.03.2018