Medya Kullanımı ve Politik Katılım: Aracı Değişken Modeli Analizi

Öz

Katılımcı siyasette medyanın etkisi her zaman önemli olmuştur. Geleneksel haber kaynakları ve online haber kaynakları politik etkililiği tetikleyerek yurttaşların politikaya katılımında önemli rol oynamıştır. Bu çalışmada medya kullanımının politik katılımdaki rolü ve etkisi politik yeterliliğin aracı değişken rolü çerçevesinde incelenmiştir. Genel olarak medyanın, gerek internet yoluyla gerekse geleneksel olarak politik katılımı ve insanların kendilerini yeterli hissetmelerinin medya araçlarıyla ilgisi analiz edildi. Veri, değişik eğitim ve gelir gurubundan 300 katılımcı ile yüz yüze yapılan anket ile toplandı. Barron ve Kenny’nin aracı değişken modeli kullanılarak analiz edildi. Analiz sonucunda, medya kullanımının politik etkililikle anlamlı ilişkisi olduğu, politik etkililiğinde politik katılımla anlamlı ilişkisi olduğu ve medya kullanımının dolaylı olarak kısmi de olsa politik katılımı etkilediği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Politik katılım, politik etkililik, aracı değişken, dolaylı etki.

Media Use and Political Participation: Mediation Analysis

Öz

Media effect always becomes an important item for political participation. Conventional news resources and online news resources triggered political efficacy to encourage citizen's participation in politics. In this study, the role and the effect of media use examined and analyzed using political efficacy as a mediating variable. Quantitative data has been derived through a questionnaire carried out with the participation of 300 people from an almost different age, income groups, and educational levels. The analysis conducted using Barron and Kenny’s mediation model. The results indicate that media use has a significant relationship with political efficacy and political efficacy has a significant relationship with political participation. Also, results indicate that media use has a relatively partial indirect effect on political participation.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Political participation, political efficacy, mediation, indirect effect.

Kaynakça

1. Aarts, Kees, ve Holli A. Semetko. “The Divided Electorate: Media Use and Political Involvement”. Journal of Politics 65, sy 3 (2003): 759- 84. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.00211.
2. Almond, Gabriel Abraham, ve Sidney Verba. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton University Press, 2015.
3. Bandura, Albert, ed. Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
4. Becker, Rolf. “Political Efficacy and Voter Turnout in East and West Germany”. German Politics 13, sy 2 (Haziran 2004): 317-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964400042000248223.
5. Bighelli, Irene, Anna Borghesani, ve Corrado Barbui. “Is the Efficacy of Antidepressants in Panic Disorder Mediated by Adverse Events? A Mediational Analysis”. PLOS ONE 12, sy 6 (02 Haziran 2017): e0178617. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178617.
6. Bratton, Michael. “Political Participation in a New Democracy: Institu- tional Considerations from Zambia”. Comparative Political Studies 32, https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414099032005002. 5 (Ağustos 1999): 549-88.
7. Bratton, Michael, Robert Mattes, ve E. Gyimah-Boadi. Public Opinion, Democracy, and Market Reform in Africa. Cambridge University Press, 2005.
8. Burns, Nancy, Kay Lehman Schlozman, ve Sidney Verba. The Private Roots of Public Action. Harvard University Press, 2001.

9. Cantor, Milton. “Popular Consent and Popular Control (Book)”. Lib- rary Journal 105, sy 6 (15 Mart 1980): 729.
10. Cappella, Joseph N., ve Kathleen Hall Jamieson. Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
11. Center, University of Michigan Survey Research, ve A. Campbell. The Voter Decides: By Angus Campbell, Gerald Gurin and Warren E.Miller, Survey Research Center, University of Michigan. with the As- sistance of Sylvia Eberhart and Robert O.Mcwilliams. Row, Peterson and https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=_L8ntAEACAAJ. Company, 1954.
12. Chang, Wen-Chun. “Media Use, Democratic Values, and Political Participation: Empirical Evidence from Taiwan”. Japanese Journal of Political Science 18, sy 3 (Eylül 2017): 385-406. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1468109917000081.
13. Chong, Alberto, Ana L. De La O, Dean Karlan, ve Leonard Wantchekon. “Does Corruption Information Inspire the Fight or Quash the Hope? A Field Experiment in Mexico on Voter Tur- nout, Choice, and Party Identification”. The Journal of Politics 77, sy 1 (Ocak 2015): 55-71. https://doi.org/10.1086/678766.
14. Coleman, Kenneth M., ve Charles L. Davis. “The Structural Context of Politics and Dimensions of Regime Performance: Their Importan- ce for the Comparative Study of Political Efficacy”. Comparative Political Studies 9, sy 2 (01 Temmuz 1976): 189-206. https://doi.org/10.1177/001041407600900203.
15. Conroy-Krutz, Jeffrey. “Media exposure and political participation in a transitional African context”. World Development 110 (01 Ekim 2018): 224-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.05.002.
16. Corrigall-Brown, Catherine, ve Rima Wilkes. “Media exposure and the engaged citizen: How the media shape political participation”. The Social Science Journal 51, sy 3 (01 Eylül 2014): 408-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2014.03.009.
17. Croke, Kevin, Guy Grossman, Horacio A. Larreguy, ve John Marshall. “Deliberate Disengagement: How Education Can Decrease Politi- cal Participation in Electoral Authoritarian Regimes”. American Political Science Review 110, sy 03 (Ağustos 2016): 579-600. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000253.
18. Eveland, William P., ve Dietram A. Scheufele. “Connecting News Media Use with Gaps in Knowledge and Participation”. Political Communication https://doi.org/10.1080/105846000414250. sy 3 (Temmuz 2000): 215-37.
19. Finkel, Steven E. “Reciprocal Effects of Participation and Political Effi- cacy: A Panel Analysis”. American Journal of Political Science 29, sy 4 (Kasım 1985): 891. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111186.
20. Gans‐Morse, Jordan, Sebastián Mazzuca, ve Simeon Nichter. “Varieties of Clientelism: Machine Politics during Elections”. American Jour- nal https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12058. Science 58, sy 2 (2014): 415-32.
21. Hair, Joseph F., ed. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7. ed., Pearson new in- ternat. ed. Pearson Custom Library. Harlow: Pearson, 2014.
22. Hoffman, Lindsay H., ve Tiffany L. Thomson. “The Effect of Television Viewing on Adolescents’ Civic Participation: Political Efficacy as a Mediating Mechanism”. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Me- dia https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150802643415. 1 (27 Şubat 2009): 3-21.
23. Lijphart, Arend. “Unequal Participation: Democracy’s Unresolved Dilemma Presidential Address, American Political Science Asso- ciation, 1996”. American Political Science Review 91, sy 1 (1997): 1– 14. https://doi.org/10.2307/2952255.
24. Linz, Juan J., ve Alfred Stepan. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. JHU Press, 1996.
25. Mattes, Robert, ve Dangalira Mughogho. “THE LIMITED IMPACTS OF FORMAL EDUCATION ON DEMOCRATIC CITIZENSHIP IN AFRICA”, t.y., 24.
26. Shah, Dhavan V., Jaeho Cho, William P. Eveland, ve Nojin Kwak. “In- formation and Expression in a Digital Age: Modeling Internet Ef- fects on Civic Participation”. Communication Research 32, sy 5 (Ekim 2005): 531-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650205279209.
27. Sharma, Subhash. Applied Multivariate Techniques. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1996.
28. Svolik, Milan W. “Learning to Love Democracy: Electoral Accountabi- lity and the Success of Democracy”. American Journal of Political Science https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12005. sy 3 (2013): 685-702.
29. Uslaner, Eric M. The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge University Press, 2002.
30. Weingast, Barry R. “The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of the Law”. American Political Science Review 91, sy 2 (1997): 245–263. https://doi.org/10.2307/2952354.
31. Zhao, Xınshu, ve Steven H. Chaffee. “Campaıgn Advertısements Ver- sus Televısıon News As Sources Of Polıtıcal Issue Informatıon”. Public Opinion Quarterly 59, sy 1 (01 Ocak 1995): 41-65. https://doi.org/10.1086/269457.