Propositions to Fill for Normative Gaps on Temporary Protection and Refugee Burden Sharing

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 80 Sayı: 2, 655 - 682, 22.07.2022

Ümmühan Elçin Ertuğrul

Öz

This paper proposes a paradigm change in the international refugee regime, whereby refugee burden-sharing must shift from state-centrism and security concerns toward a perspective grounded in human rights and the international community. Furthermore, it proposes to fill normative gaps regarding temporary protection and refugee burden-sharing.
The right to obtain and receive protection in other countries for a person who is faced with persecution in their own country is a human right However, it does not constitute an international obligation for states under the present refugee regime. Refugee admission is solely under the control and at the discretion of the host states. States usually avoid admitting refugees due to various concerns regarding security, their social and economic situation, and the like. As a result, the refugee burden is placed on the shoulders of just a few states. In fact, it should be shared by all.
This paper advocates placing the burden of refugees, including the burden of temporary protection, on the international community as a whole. The argument is that refugee burden-sharing is a jus cogens from which the international community as a whole benefits and that jus cogens entails erga omnes obligation for the international community as a whole. In fact, erga omnes obligations may arise even if refugee burden-sharing is not accepted as jus cogens under international law. In discussions on refugee burden-sharing, the logic of collective action and the prisoner’s dilemma have been considered. This paper also contends that burden-sharing states have rights in personam to claim from other states, inspired by Hart’s theory of “mutuality of restriction.” The essence of this paper is based on Friedman’s notion of an everchanging international community and, thus, on an understanding of international law.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Temporary Protection, Refugee Burden-Sharing, Jus Cogens, Erga Omnes, The Theory of Mutuality of Restriction, International Refugee Law

Geçici Koruma ve Mülteci Yükünün Paylaşılmasındaki Normatif Boşlukların Giderilmesiyle Ilgili Öneriler

Öz

Bu çalışmada, uluslararası mülteci rejiminde bir paradigma değişikliği yani mülteci yükü paylaşımının, güvenlik odaklı devlet merkezinden; insan hakları odaklı, uluslararası toplum merkezine kaydırılması önerilir. Ayrıca, geçici koruma ve mülteci yükü paylaşımına ilişkin normatif boşlukları doldurmak için öneriler sunulur.
Menşe ülkesinde zulüm gören kişilerin başka ülkelere sığınması ya da sığınma araması bir insan hakkıdır. Ancak bu durum, mevcut mülteci rejimine göre, devletler için uluslararası bir yükümlülük oluşturmaz. Şöyle ki, mülteci kabulü, ev sahibi devletlerin münhasır egemenliği dahilindedir ve tamamen ev sahibi devletlerin takdirine bırakılmıştır. Devletler genellikle, güvenlik, sosyal ve ekonomik durum ve benzeri kaygılar nedeniyle, ülkelerine mülteci almaktan kaçınmaktadırlar. Bunun sonucu olarak da mülteci yükü çok az sayıda devletin omuzlarına kalmaktadır.
Çalışma, geçici korumanın da dahil olduğu mülteci yükünü, bir bütün olarak uluslararası topluma yükler. Mülteci yükünün paylaşımının, bir bütün olarak uluslararası toplumun menfaatine olan jus cogens kural olduğunu ve bundan herkese karşı ileri sürülebilen erga omnes yükümlülük doğduğunu savunur. Erga omnes yükümlülük, mülteci yükünün paylaşılması jus cogens kural kabul edilmese dahi söz konusu olabilecektir. Mülteci yükünün paylaşımında Kolektif Hareketin Mantığı ve Mahkum İkilemi, göz önünde tutulmuştur. Bu çalışma ayrıca, Hart’ın “kısıtlamaların karşılıklılığı” teorisine göre, mülteci yükünü paylaşan devletlerin, diğerler devletlerden talep edebilecekleri nisbi haklarının olduğunu iddia eder. Çalışmanın konusu, Friedmann’ın, uluslararası toplum ve dolayısıyla uluslararası hukukun değişimine dayandırılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Geçici Koruma, Mülteci Yükünün Paylaşılması, Jus Cogens, Erga Omnes Yükümlülük, Kısıtlamaların Karşılıklılığı Teorisi, Uluslararası Mülteci Hukuku

Kaynakça

• 1981tarihli Report of the Meeting of the Expert Group on Temporary Refugee in Situations of Large Scale Influx
• (https://www.unhcr.org/excom/scip/3ae68cc08/report-meeting-expert-group-temporary-refuge- situations-large-scale-influx.html)
• 1996-1998 tarihli Progress Repseort on Informal Consultations on the Provision of International Protection to All Who Need It (https://www.unhcr.org/excom/standcom/3ae68cff4/progress- report-informal-consultations-provision-international-protection.html)
• 2001 tarihli Protection of Refugees in the Mass Influx Situation: Overall Protection Framework, Global Consultation on International Protection (https://www.unhcr.org/protection/ globalconsult/3ae68f3c24/protection-refugees-mass-influx-situations-overall-protection- framework.html )
• Arsava F,‘Egemenlik ve Koruma Sorumluluğu’, (2011) XV/1 Gazi Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 101-124
• Arulanantham A T, ‘Restructured Safe Haven’ A Proposal for Reform of the Refugee Protection System, (2000) 22 Human Rights Quarterly 1-56
• Bicchieri C, The Grammar of Society, The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms, (Cambridge University Press, 2006).
• Bodansky D, ‘What’s in a Concept? Global Public Goods, International Law and Legitimacy’, (2012) 23/3 EJIL 651-668
• Çelebi Ö, ‘Kuramların Sessizliği: Liberalizm, Realizm ve İltica Rejiminin Kuruluşu’ İltica, Uluslararası Göç ve Vatansızlık: Kuram, Gözlem ve Politika, (BMMYK Yayını 2011) 9-26
• Çiçekli B, Uluslararası Hukukta Mülteciler ve Sığınmacılar, (Seçkin Yayınevi 2009)
• Dünya Mültecilerinin Durumu, Bir İnsanlık Sorunu, Birleşmiş Milletler Mülteciler Yüksek Komiserliği,( Oxford University Press 1997-1998)
• Ertuğrul Ü E, ‘Koruma Sorumluluğu: İnsani Müdahaleyi Makyajlamak’, (2016) XX/2 Gazi Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 121-150
• Ertuğrul Ü E, ‘Turkey: The Host Country For Syrian Citizens And The Question Of Sharing The Burden‘, (Nisan 2017) XXI/2 Gazi Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 155-173
• Ertuğrul Ü E, ‘En Ağır Yük; İnsan Yükü ve Uluslararası Hukukta Yükün Paylaşılması‘, Uluslararası Ortadoğu Sempozyumu Bildirileri, (Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Yayınları 2014) 565-585
• Fitzpatrick J, ‘Temporary Protection of Refugees: Elements of a Formalized Regime’ (2000) 94/2 The American Journal of International Law 279-305
• Friedmann W, The Changing Structure of International Law,( Columbia University Press 1964)
• Gemalmaz M S, Ulusalüstü İnsan Hakları Hukukunun Genel Teorisine Giriş, (8. Bası, Legal Yayıncılık, San. Tic. Ltd. Şti., 2012)
• Güler A, ‘Uluslararası Mülteci Rejimi: Afganistan Üzerinden Bir Rejim Etkinliği Analizi’ (2013) 9/36 Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi 101-127
• Gürkan Ü, Sosyolojik Hukuk İlmi, (Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Yayınları, Ajans Türk Matbaası 1961)
• Gürler S, ‘Hukuk Ahlak’tan Ayrılabilir mi? H.L.A. Hart Üzerinden Bir Tartışma’, (2016) 92 Bilim ve Sanat Vakfı, https://www.bisav.org.tr/Bulten/270/1627/hukuk_ahlaktan_ayrilabilir_ mi_h_l_a_hart_uzerinden_bir_tartisma
• Handbook on Procedures Criteria for Determining Refugee Status under the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees, HCR/IP/4/ENG/REV.1 Reedited, Geneva, January 1992 (UNHCR 1979) https://www.unhcr.org/4d93528a9.pdf
• Hart H L A, ‘Doğal Haklar Var mı?’ H.L.A. Hart ve Hukuk-Ahlak Ayrımı, (Tekin Yayınevi 2015) Hart H L A, ‘Are There Any Natural Rights’ (1955) 64/2 The Philosophical Review 175-191 Hart H LA, Essay in Jurisprudence and Philosophy, (Clarendon Press 1983)
• Hathaway J C. & Neve R. A, ‘Making International Refugee Law Relevant Again: A Proposal for Collectivized and Solution-Oriented Protection’ ( 1997) 10 Harvard Human Rights Journal 115-211
• İneli-Ciger M, ‘A Temporary Protection Regime in Line with International Law: Utopia or Real Possibility’( 2016) 18 International Law Community Law Review 278-316
• İneli-Ciger M, ‘The Global Compact on Refugees and Burden Sharing:Will the Compact Adress the Normative Gap Concerning Burden Sharing’, (2019) 38 Refugee Survey Quarterly 115-138
• İneli-Ciger M, Temporary Protection in Law and Practice, (International Refugee Law Series, Brill Nijhoff 2018)
• İnsan Hakları ve Mülteciler, Birleşmiş Milletler Mülteciler Yüksek Komiserliği İnsan Hakları Bilgi Kitapçığı, No:20
• Jhering R V, Hukuk Uğrunda Savaş, (Sinan Matbaası 1964)
• Kadelbach S, ‘Jus Cogens, Obligations Erga Omnes and other Rules- The Identification of Fundemantal Norms’, Ed. Christian Tomuschat and Jean- Marc Thouvenin, The Fundamental Rules of the International Legal Order, (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2006)
• Kelsen H, General Theory of Law and State,20th Century Legal Philosophy Series Vol. 1, Third Printing (Harvard University Press 1949)
• Kritzman-Amir T, ‘Not in My Backyard: On the Morality of Responsibility Sharing in Refugee Law’, (2008-2009) 34/2 Brook. J. Int’l . L. 355- 393
• Leibholz G, ‘Hukukun Gayesi’, (1937) 3 İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası 515-533
• https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780195369380.001.0001/acref- 9780195369380-e-2028
• Meron T, ‘On A Hierarchy of International Human Rights’ (January 1986) 80/1 The American Journal of International Law 1-23
• Olson M, The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups ,Twentieth Printing, (Harvard University Press 2002)
• Oppenheim L, International Law ; A Treatise. Ed. H. Lauterpacht , Vol I. -Peace, (Longmans, Green and Co. 1955)
• Orakhelashvili A, Peremptory Norms in International Responsibility, (Oxford University Press 2010)
• Özcan M, Avrupa Birliği Sığınma Hukuku: Ortak Bir Sığınma Hukukunun Ortaya Çıkışı, (USAK Books, 2005)
• Özkan I, Göç, İltica ve Sığınma Hukuku, (Seçkin Yayınları 2013)
• Öztürk N Ö, ‘Geçici Korumanın Uluslararası Koruma Rejimine Uyumu Üzerine Bir İnceleme’ (2017) 66(1) Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 201-264
• Ragazzi M, The Concepts of International Obligations Erga Omnes, Oxford Monographs in International Law, (Oxford University Press 2002)
• Roper S D &Lilian A B, ‘Burden Sharing in the Funding of the UNHCR: Refugee Protection as an Impure Public Law’, (August 2010) 54/4 Journal of Conflict Resolution 616-637
• Schuck P H, ‘Refugee Burden-Sharing: A Modest Proposal’, (1997) 22 Yale Journal of International Law 243-297
• Slater R H, ‘A Jurisprudental Analysis of the Interpretation of ‘ Persecution’ under the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees at the Domestic Level’, (PhD Thesis, Birmingham Law School, College of Arts and Law, University of Birmingham 2014)
• Storey H & Wallace R, ‘War and Peace in Refugee Law Jurisprudence’, (Apr. 2001) 95/2 The American Journal of International Law 349-366
• Suhrke A, ‘Burden-sharing during Refugee Emergencies: The Logic of Collective versus National Action’ (1998) 11/4 Journal of Refugee Studies 396-415
• Taşdemir F, Uluslararası Nitelikte Olmayan Silahlı Çatışmalar Hukuku, (Adalet Yayınevi 2009)
• Thielemann E R,Towards A Common EU Asylum Policy: The Political Economy of Refugee Burden- Sharing.
• http://www.utexas.edu/cola/centers/european_studies/_files/PDF/immigration-policy-conference/ thielemann.pdf. 2-22
• Thielemann E, ‘Why Refugee Burden-Sharing Initiatives Fail: Public Goods, Free Riding and Symbolic Solidarity in the EU’, (2018) 56/1 JCMS .63-82
• Tucker A W, ‘The Mathematics of Tucker: A Sampler – A Two-Person Dilemma:The Prisoner’s Dilemma’,(Jun., 1983) 14/3 The Two Year College Mathematics Journal 228-232
• Vattel E, The Law of Nations, Or , Principles of the Law of Nature, Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns, with Three Early Essay on the Origin and Nature of Natural Law and on Luxury, (Liberty Fund. 2008)
• Yamaner M B, A E Öktem, B Kurtdarcan, M C. Uzun, 12 Ağustos 1949 Cenevre Sözleşmeleri ve Ek Protokolleri, (Galatasaray Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Yayınları)
• https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/prisoner-dilemma/ https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/FactSheet20en.pdf https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780195369380.001.0001/acref- 9780195369380-e-2028
• http://responsibilitytoprotect.org/ICISS%20Report.pdf
• http://www.multeci.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/1951-Cenevre-Sozlesmesi-1.pdf http://www.tuicakademi.org/tutsak-ikilemi/
• - http://www.unhcr.org/4ca34be29.pdf
• http://www.unhcr.org/en-us/news/latest/2015/6/558193896/worldwide-displacement-hits-all-time- high-war-persecution-increase.html
• http://www.unicankara.org.tr/doc_pdf/h_rigths_turkce.pdf
• https://au.int/sites/default/files/treaties/36400-treaty-0005_-_oau_convention_governing_the_ specific_aspects_of_refugee_problems_in_africa_e.pdf
• https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/financing/fundings/migration-asylum-borders/refugee-fund_en,
• https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/financing/fundings/migration-asylum-borders/asylum- migration-integration-fund_en
• https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32001L0055 https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft_articles/9_6_2001.pdf https://undocs.org/en/A/RES/37/195
• https://undocs.org/en/A/RES/428(V) https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/50/judgments
• https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/50/050-19700205-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf https://www.oas.org/dil/1984_cartagena_declaration_on_refugees.pdf https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/FactSheet20en.pdf https://www.unhcr.org/4d93528a9.pdf
• https://www.unhcr.org/59e747f37.pdf https://www.unhcr.org/5e20790e4 https://www.unhcr.org/afr/3cc413316.pdf https://www.unhcr.org/figures-at-a-glance.html https://www.unhcr.org/gcr/GCR_English.pdf https://www.unhcr.org/global-refugee-forum.html
• https://www.savethechildren.net/news/refugee-children-must-have-access-education-and-be- protected-though-concrete-commitments-global
• https://www.unhcr.org/new-york-declaration-for-refugees-and-migrants.html