ADİL YARGILAMANIN ULUSLARARASI BİÇİMSEL STANDARTLARININ GACACA YARGISI ANALİZİ İÇİN YETERLİLİĞİ SORUNU

Öz

Ruanda soykırımı faillerinin yargılanmasında olağan mahkemeler yanında işlerlik kazandırılan Gacaca yargısı, özellikle halkın katılımına dayanan işleyişiyle Batılı liberal yargı modelinden farklı bir sistem olarak adil yargılamanın uluslararası biçimsel standartları temelinde eleştirilere tabi tutulmuştur. Bu eleştirilerde, hükümeti olağan mahkeme sistemini destekleyecek arayışlara sürüklemiş olan mevcut koşulların göz ardı edildiği görülmektedir. Bu koşullar hem devletin maddi imkânsızlıklarını hem de soykırım vahşetiyle parçalanmış sosyal dokunun yeniden inşası ihtiyacını içermekteydi. Bu eleştiriler aynı zamanda da Gacaca yargısının dayandığı değer, amaç ve mantığı temelinde sanıklara sunduğu güvenceleri ihmal etmekteydi. Gacaca geçiş süreci adaletinin sihirli bir değneği olmasa da, göz ardı edilen bu hususlar, pratiğinde ortaya çıkan sorunların Gacaca’nın Batılı liberal yargı modeline dönüştürülerek çözülmesinin hem koşullar itibariyle olanaklı olmadığını hem de Ruanda’nın soykırım sonrası ihtiyaçlarına karşılık veremeyeceğini göstermektedir. Bu durumda Gacaca pratiğinde ortaya çıkan sorunların kaynaklarının belirlenmesi ve bu şekilde gelecekteki geçiş süreci adaleti uygulamalarına yol gösterilmesi isteniyorsa, Gacaca analizinin Gacaca’nın temellerini oluşturan koşullar, amaçlar ve yapısal özellikleri arasındaki bağlantılar ile içerisinde işlediği siyasal durum esas alınarak yapılması gerekmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ruanda Soykırımı
• geçiş süreci adaleti
• Gacaca
• adil yargılanma hakkı
• uzlaşma.
• Rwandan genocide
• transitional justice
• right to a fair trial
• reconciliation.

THE PROBLEM OF THE ADEQUACY OF INTERNATIONAL FORMAL STANDARDS OF FAIR TRIAL FOR THE ANALYSIS OF THE GACACA COURTS

Öz

The Gacaca judiciary which was functionalized along with ordinary courts in the trials of the perpetrators of the Rwandan genocide as a system differing particularly with its operation based on the participation of the people from the Western liberal judiciary model, was subjected to criticism based on international formal standards of fair trial. It is observed in these criticisms that the existing conditions, which led the government to pursuits aiming to reinforce the regular court system, are ignored. These criticisms were, at the same time, neglecting the guarantees that the defendants were provided with before the Gacaca courts on the basis of the values, purpose and logic on which they were based. Even though the Gacaca might not be the magic wand of transitional justice, these neglected points demonstrate that solving the problems that have arisen during its practice by transforming Gacaca into a Western liberal judiciary system was not possible considering the circumstances, and it could not respond to Rwanda’s post-genocide needs. In this case, if one wishes the sources of the problems that emerged within the practice of Gacaca to be determined and in this way transitional justice practices in the future to be guided, the analysis of Gacaca needs to be carried out by grounding it on the connections between the conditions, purposes and structural properties that constitute its base, and the political context within which it has functioned.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ruanda Soykırımı
• geçiş süreci adaleti
• Gacaca
• adil yargılanma hakkı
• uzlaşma.
• Rwandan genocide
• transitional justice
• right to a fair trial
• reconciliation.

Kaynakça

1. “Rwanda: ICTR Preparing to Indict First Tutsis”, 12.4.2002, , Erişim Tarihi: 10.3.2022.
2. , Erişim Tarihi: 25.10.2022.
3. , Erişim Tarihi: 25.10.2022.
4. 1 Ekim 1990 ve 31 Aralık 1994 Arasında İşlenen Soykırım ve İnsanlığa Karşı Suçların Faillerinin Kovuşturulması ve Yargılanması ile Yetkilendirilen Gacaca Mahkemelerinin Örgütlenmesi, Yetkisi ve İşleyişini Düzenleyen 16/2004 Sayılı Organik Yasa, , Erişim Tarihi: 12.5.2022.
5. 1 Ekim 1990 ve 31 Aralık 1994 Arasında İşlenen Soykırım veya İnsanlığa Karşı Suç Teşkil Eden Fiillerin Kovuşturulmalarını Düzenleyen ve Gacaca Yargısını Kuran 26.01.2001 Tarih ve 40/2000 Sayılı Organik Yasa, , Erişim Tarihi: 12.5.2022.
6. 13/2008 Sayılı 19/05/2008 Tarihli Organik Yasa, , Erişim Tarihi: 10.6.2022.
7. Ball, Howard: Prosecuting War Crimes and Genocide: The Twentieth Century Experience, University Press of Kansas, 1999.
8. Bauman, Zygmunt: Modernite ve Holocaust, çev. Süha Sertabiboğlu, Versus Kitap, İstanbul, 2007.

9. Bensaïd, Daniel: “Daimi Skandal”, Eric Hazan (Ed.), Demokrasi Ne Alemde?, çev. Savaş Kılıç, Metis Yayınları, İstanbul, 2010, s.24-50.
10. Birleşmiş Milletler Genel Sekreteri: Letter Dated 9 December 1994 from the Secretary-General Addressed to the President of the Security Council, 9.12.1994, , Erişim Tarihi: 24.10.2022.
11. Birleşmiş Milletler İnsan Hakları Komitesi: “Concluding observations of the Human Rights Commitee: Rwanda”, CCPR/C/RWA/CO/3, 7.5.2009, , Erişim Tarihi: 24.10.2022.
12. Braithwaite, John: “Restorative Justice: Assessing Optimistic and Pessimistic Accounts”, Crime and Justice, C. 25, 1999, s.1-127.
13. Braithwaite, John: Crime, Shame and Reintegration, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1989.
14. Brehm, Hollie Nyseth/Uggen, Christopher/Gasanabo, Jean-Damascène: “Genocide, Justice, and Rwanda’s Gacaca Courts”, Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, C. 30, S. 3, 2014, s.333-352.
15. Chakravarty, Anurdha: “Gacaca Courts in Rwanda: Explaining Divisions within the Human Rights Community”, Yale Journal of International Affairs, C. 1, S. 2, 2006, s.132-145.
16. Chakravarty, Anurdha: Investing in Authoritarian Rule – Punishment and Patronage in Rwanda’s Gacaca Courts for Genocide Crimes, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2016.
17. Clark, Phil: “The Gacaca Courts and Abbreviated Criminal Procedure for Genocide Crimes in Rwanda”, Morten Bergsmo (Ed.), Abbreviated Criminal Procedures for Core International Crimes, Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher, 2017, s.189-208.
18. Clark, Phil: The Gacaca Courts, Post-genocide Justice and Reconciliation in Rwanda – Justice without Lawyers, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2010.
19. Cobban, Helena: “The Legacies of Collective Violence: The Rwandan Genocide and the Limits of the Law”, Boston Review, C. 27, 1.4.2002, , Erişim Tarihi: 8.5.2022.
20. Daly, Erin: “Between Punitive and Reconstructive Justice: The Gacaca Courts in Rwanda”, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, C. 34, S. 2, 2002, s.355-396.
21. Dauge-Roth, Alexandre: “Testimonial Encounter-Esther Mujawayo’s Dialogic Art of Witnessing”, French Cultural Studies, C. 20, S.2, 2009, s.165-180.
22. Des Forges, Alison/Longman, Timothy: “Legal Responses to Genocide in Rwanda”, Eric Stover, Harvey M. Weinstein (Ed.), My Neighbor, My Enemy – Justice and Community in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2004, s.49-68.
23. Doughty, Kristin: “Law and the Architecture of Social Repair: Gacaca Days in Post-genocide Rwanda”, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, C. 21, S. 2, 2015, s.419-437.
24. Drumbl, Mark A.: “Punishment, Postgenocide: From Guilt to Shame to Civis in Rwanda”, New York University Law Review, C. 75, S. 5, 2000, s.1221-1326.
25. Drumbl, Mark A.: “Rule of Law Amid Lawlessness: Counseling the Accused in Rwanda's Domestic Genocide Trials”, Columbia Human Rights Law Review, C. 29, S. 3, 1998, s.545-640.
26. Du Toit, Fanie: Reconciliation and Transitional Justice: The Case of Rwanda’s Gacaca Courts, Institute for Justice and Reconciliation, Cape Town, 2011.
27. Fierens, Jacques: ”Gacaca Courts: Between Fantasy and Reality”, Journal of International Criminal Justice, C. 3, S. 4, 2005, s.896-919.
28. Fletcher, Laurel E./Weinstein Harvey M.: “Violence and Social Repair: Rethinking the Contribution of Justice to Reconciliation”, Human Rights Quarterly, C. 24, S. 3, 2002, s.573-639.
29. Haile, Dadimos: “Rwanda’s Experiment in People’s Courts (gacaca) and the Tragedy of Unexamined Humanitarianism: A Normative/Ethical Perspective”, Discussion Paper, Institute of Development Policy and Management, Antwerpen, 2008.
30. Halpern, Jodi/Weinstein, Harvey M.: “Empathy and Rehumanization after Mass Violence”, Eric Stover, Harvey M. Weinstein (Ed.), My Neighbor, My Enemy – Justice and Community in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2004, s.303-322.
31. Hintjens, Helen: “Post-genocide Identity Politics in Rwanda”, Ethnicities, C. 8, S. 1, 2008, s.5-41.
32. Ingelaere, Bert: “Does the Truth Pass across the Fire without Burning?’ Locating the Short Circuit in Rwanda’s Gacaca Courts”, The Journal of Modern African Studies”, C. 47, S. 4, 2009, s.507-528.
33. İnsan Hakları İzleme Örgütü: “Law and Reality: Progress in Judicial Reform in Rwanda”, , Erişim Tarihi: 24.10.2022.
34. İnsan Hakları İzleme Örgütü: “Rwanda: Events of 2021”, , Erişim Tarihi: 24.10.2022.
35. İnsan Hakları İzleme Örgütü: “US: Revival of Guantanamo Military Commissions a Blow to Justice”, 15.5.2009, , Erişim Tarihi: 18.3.2022.
36. Jansen, Yakaré-Oulé (Nani): “Denying Genocide or Denying Free Speech? A Case Study of the Application of Rwanda’s Genocide Denial Laws”, Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights, C. 12, S. 2, 2014, s.191-213.
37. Johnstone, Gerry/Van Ness, Daniel W.: “The Meaning of Restorative Justice”, Gerry johnstone, Daniel W. Van Ness (Ed.), Handbook of Restorative Justice, Willan Publishing, Oregon, 2007, s.5-23.
38. Johnstone, Gerry: Restorative Justice - Ideas, Values, Debates, Willan Publishing, Oregon, 2002.
39. Karekezi, Urusaro/Nshimiyimana, Alphonse/Mutamba, Beth: “Localizing Justice: Gacaca Courts in Post-genocide Rwanda”, Eric Stover, Harvey M. Weinstein (Ed.), My Neighbor, My Enemy – Justice and Community in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2004, s.69-84.
40. Letwin, Shirley Robin: “The Morality of Democracy and the Rule of Law”, G. Brennan, L. E. Lomasky (Ed.), Politics and Process – New Essays in Democratic Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989, s.221-234.
41. Levinas, Emmanuel: “Peace and Proximity”, Adriaan T. Peperzak, Simon Critchley, Robert Bernasconi (Ed.), Emmanuel Levinas - Basic Philosophical Writings, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1996, s.161-169.
42. Longman, Timothy/Rutagengwa, Théonéste: “Memory, Identity, and Community in Rwanda”, Eric Stover, Harvey M. Weinstein (Ed.), My Neighbor, My Enemy – Justice and Community in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2004, s.162-182.
43. Longman, Timothy: “Justice at the Grassroots? Gacaca Trials in Rwanda”, Naomi Roht-Arriaza, Javier Mariezcurrena (Ed.), Transitional Justice in the Twenty-First Century - Beyond Truth versus Justice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006, s.206-228.
44. Mamdani, Mahmood: “When Does a Settler Become a Native? Reflections of the Colonial Roots of Citizenship in Equatorial and South Africa”, 2002, , Erişim Tarihi: 18.5.2022.
45. Martin, Dianne L.: “Retribution Revisited: A Reconsideration of Feminist Criminal Law Reform Strategies”, Osgoode Hall Law Journal, C. 36, S. 1, 1998, s.151-188.
46. McVeigh, Karen: “Spate of Killings Obstructs Rwanda's Quest for Justice”, 3.12.2006, , Erişim Tarihi: 18.5.2022.
47. Mendez, Juan E.: “Accountability for Past Abuses”, Human Rights Quarterly, C. 19, S. 2, 1997, s.255-282. Meyerstein, Ariel: “Between Law and Culture: Rwanda’s Gacaca and Postcolonial Legality”, Law & Social Inquiry, C. 32 S. 2, 2007, s.467-508.
48. Molenaar, Arthur: Gacaca: Grassroots Justice after Genocide-The Key to Reconciliation in Rwanda?, African Studies Centre, Leiden, 2005.
49. Özdemir, Omca: “Geçiş Adaletinde Sosyo-Hukuksal Bir Yargı Mekanizması Olarak Gacaca Yargısının Kuruluşu”, Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, C. 26, S. 3, 2022, s.619-674.
50. Özdemir, Omca: Demokrasi ve Hukuk Devleti İlişkisinin Liberal Kavranışı – Siyasete Karşı Hukuk, Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, yayımlanmamış doktora tezi, 2018.
51. Peskin, Victor: International Justice in Rwanda and the Balkans - Virtual Trials and the Struggle for State Cooperation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008.
52. Raper, Jessica: “The Gacaca Experiment: Rwanda's Restorative Dispute Resolution Response to the 1994 Genocide”, Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Review, C. 5, S. 1, 2004, s.1-56.
53. Rettig, Max: “Gacaca: Truth, Justice, and Reconciliation in Postconflict Rwanda?”, African Studies Review, C. 51, S. 3, 2008, s.25-50.
54. Reyntjens, Filip: “Rwanda, Ten Years on: From Genocide to Dictatorship”, African Affairs, C. 103, S. 411, 2004, s.177-210. Ruanda için Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi (basın açıklaması): “Prosecutor Outlines Future Plans”, 13.12.2000, , Erişim Tarihi: 10.3.2022.
55. Ruanda için Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi Statüsü, , Erişim Tarihi: 18.8.2022.
56. Sancar, Mithat: Geçmişle Hesaplaşma – Unutma Kültüründen Hatırlama Kültürüne, İletişim Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 2007.
57. Sarkin, Jeremy: “The Tension between Justice and Reconciliation in Rwanda: Politics, Human Rights, Due Process and the Role of the Gacaca Courts in Dealing with the Genocide”, Journal of African Law, C. 45, S. 2, 2001, s.143-172. Schabas, William A.: “Genocide Trials and Gacaca Courts”, Journal of International Criminal Justice, C. 3, S. 4, 2005, s.879-895.
58. Schabas, William A.: “Justice, Democracy, and Impunity in Post-genocide Rwanda: Searching for Solutions to Impossible Problems”, Criminal Law Forum, C. 7, S. 3, 1996, s.523-560.
59. Sémelin, Jacques: Arındırma ve Yok Etme – Katliam ve Soykırımın Siyasi Kullanımları, çev. Melike Işık Durmaz, İletişim Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 2011.
60. Sullo, Pietro: Beyond Genocide: Transitional Justice and Gacaca Courts in Rwanda, Asser Press, The Hague, 2018. Teitel, Ruti: “Transitional Justice Genealogy”, Harvard Human Rights Journal, C.16, 2003, s.69-94.
61. Thomson, Susan/Nagy, Rosemary: “Law, Power and Justice: What Legalism Fails to Address in the Functioning of Rwanda’s Gacaca Courts”, The International Journal of Transitional Justice, C. 5, S. 1, 2010, s.11-30.
62. Thomson, Susan: “The Darker Side of Transitional Justice: The Power Dynamics Behind Rwanda’s Gacaca Courts”, Journal of the International African Institute, C. 81, S. 3, 2011, s.373-390.
63. Tiemessen, Alana Erin: “After Arusha: Gacaca Justice in Post-genocide Rwanda”, African Studies Quarterly, C. 8, S. 1, 2004, s.57-76.
64. Tully, L. Danielle: “Human Rights Compliance and the Gacaca Jurisdictions in Rwanda”, Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, C. 26, S. 2, 2003, s.385-414.
65. Uluslararası Af Örgütü: “Rwanda: The troubled Course of Justice”, 25.4.2000, Index Number: AFR 47/010/2000, , Erişim Tarihi: 14.3.2022.
66. Uluslararası Af Örgütü: “Gacaca: A Question of Justice”, 17.12.2002, Index Number: AFR 47/007/2002, , Erişim Tarihi: 12.3.2022.
67. Uluslararası Af Örgütü: “Rwanda 2021”, , Erişim Tarihi: 24.10.2022.
68. Uluslararası Af Örgütü: “Rwanda: Human rights organisation forced to close down”, , Erişim Tarihi: 24.10.2022.
69. Uluslararası Af Örgütü: Safer to Stay Silent - The Chilling Effect of Rwanda’s Laws on ‘Genocide İdeology’ and ‘Sectarianism’, 31.8.2010, Index Number: AFR 47/005/2010, , Erişim Tarihi: 24.10.2022.
70. Uvin, Peter: “Prejudice, Crisis, and Genocide in Rwanda”, African Studies Review, C. 40, S. 2, 1997, s.91-115.
71. Uvin, Peter: “The Gacaca Tribunals in Rwanda”, Reconciliation After Violent Conflict - A Handbook, ed. David Bloomfield, Teresa Barnes and Luc Huyse, International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, Stockholm, 2003, s.116-121.
72. Venter, Christine: “Eliminating Fear through Recreating Community in Rwanda: The Role of the Gacaca Courts”, Texas Wesleyan Law Review, C. 13, S. 2, 2007, s.577-598.
73. Weinstein, Harvey M./Stover, Eric: “Introduction: Conflict, Justice and Reclamation”, Eric Stover, Harvey M. Weinstein (Ed.), My Neighbor, My Enemy – Justice and Community in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2004, s.1-26.
74. Wierzynska, Aneta: “Consolidating Democracy through Transitional Justice: Rwanda’s Gacaca Courts”, New York University Law Review, C. 79, S. 5, 2004, s.1934-1969.