Marksizm ve Hak Kavramı: Kuramsal Bir Yaklaşım Denemesi

Öz

Bu makale, Marksizm’in güncelliğini, yalnızca insan özgürlüğü ve saygınlığı değerleri üzerinden işleyen liberal insan hakları teorilerini eleştirmek açısından değil, aynı zamanda, mevcut liberal insan hakları teorilerinin yerini alabilecek potansiyel bir kaynak olarak sürdürdüğünü öne sürmektedir. Bu bağlamda, çalışma, Marksist düşünce içerisinde hak teorilerinin yerini araştırmakta ve Marksist söylem içerisinden insan hakları ile ilgili bir teori geliştirebilmek için esaslı önemi haiz belli başlı çekişmeli konuları ele almaktadır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Evrensellik,belirlenimsizlik ilkesi,kendi kaderini tayin hakkı,sömürü

Marxism and The Concept of Right: an Essay of A Theoretical Approach

Öz

This article argues that Marxism retains its relevance in the current period not only as a source of critique that challenges those liberal human rights theories on the basis of the very values of human freedom and dignity but also as a potential source capable of replacing liberal human rights theories. Against this background the study explores the position of right theories in Marxist thought and analyses some controversial issues that are essential for developing a theory dealing with human rights from within Marxism itself

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Universality,indeterminancy thesis,right to self-determination,exploitation

Kaynakça

1. Althusser, Louis (2002), Marx İçin, (Çev. A. Işık Ergüden), İthaki Yayınları, İstanbul.
2. Althusser, Louis (2006), Yeniden Üretim Üzerine, (Çev. A. Işık Ergüden-Alp Tümertekin), İthaki Yayınları, İstanbul.
3. Althusser, Louis (2009), Kriz Yazıları: Althusser’den Sonra Althusser, (Çev. Alp Tümertekin), İthaki Yayınları, İstanbul.
4. Anderson, Perry (2007), Batı Marksizmi Üzerine Düşünceler, (Çev. Bülent Aksoy), Bi- rikim Yayınları, İstanbul.
5. Badiou, Alan (2006), Etik: Kötülük Kavrayışı Üzerine Bir Deneme, (Çev. Tuncay Birkan), Metis Yayınları, İstanbul.
6. Bakhurst, David (1985), “Marxism and Ethical Particularism: A Response To Steven Lukes’s Marxism and Morality”, Praxis International, Issue: 5, No: 2 July, s. 209- 223.
7. Balibar, Etienne (2008), Biz, Avrupa Halkı? Ulusaşırı Yurttaşlık Üzerine Düşünceler, (Çev. Kutlu Tunca), ARA-lık Yayınları, İzmir.
8. Barnett, R. (1998), The Structure of Liberty, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

9. Bartholomew, Amy (1990), “Should A Marxist Believe In Human Rights?”, Socialist Register, Vol. 26, s. 244-264.
10. Baxi, Upendra (2006), The Future of Human Rights, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
11. Birkan, Tuncay (2006), “Çevirenin Önsözü”, Badiou, Alan, Etik: Kötülük Kavrayışı Ü- zerine Bir Deneme, (Çev. Tuncay Birkan), Metis Yayınları, İstanbul, s. 7-11.
12. Bowring, Bill (2008), The Degradation Of The International Legal Order?, Routledge- Cavendish, New York.
13. Bowring, Bill (2008), “Positivism versus self-determination: contradictions of Soviet international law”, Marks, Susan (Ed.), International Law On The Left: Re- examining Marxist Legacies, Cambridge University Press, New York, s. 133-169.
14. Chimni, B. S. (2008), “An outline of a Marxist course on public international law”, Marks, Susan (Ed.), International Law On The Left: Re-examining Marxist Legacies, Cambridge University Press, New York, s. 53-92.
15. Fine, Bob (1986), Democracy and The Rule of Law: Liberal Ideas and Marxist Critiques, Pluto Press, London.
16. Horwitz, M. J. (1977), “The Rule of Law: An Unqualified Human Good”, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 86’dan aktaran Brad R. Roth, “Marxian insights for the human rights project”, Marks, Susan (Ed.), International Law On The Left: Re-examining Marxist Legacies, Cambridge University Press, New York 2008, s. 220–252, s. 561, 566.
17. Koskenniemi, Martti (2005), From Apology to Utopia, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
18. Koskenniemi, Martti (2008), “What should international lawyers learn from Karl Marx?”, Marks, Susan (Ed.), International Law On The Left: Re-examining Marxist Legacies, Cambridge University Press, New York, s. 30-53.
19. Lukes, Steven (1981), “Can A Marxist Believe In Human Rights”, Praxis International, Issue: 4, s. 334-345.
20. Macdonell, Diane (1991), Theories Of Discourse: An Introduction, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
21. Marks, Susan (Ed.) (2008), International Law On The Left: Re-examining Marxist Legacies, Cambridge University Press, New York.
22. Marks, Susan (2008), “Exploitation as an international legal concept”, Marks, Susan (Ed.), International Law On The Left: Re-examining Marxist Legacies, Cambridge University Press, New York, s. 281-309.
23. Marx, Karl (1997), Yahudi Sorunu, Sol Yayınları, Ankara.
24. Milovanovic, Dragan (2003), An Introduction to the Sociology of Law, Criminal Justice Press, New York.
25. Okafor, O. Chinedu (2008), “Marxian embraces (and decouplings) in Upendra Baxi’s human rights scholarship: a case study”, Marks, Susan (Ed.), International Law on The Left: Re-examining Marxist Legacies, Cambridge University Press, New York, s. 252-281.
26. Pashukanis, Evgeny B. (2002), Genel Hukuk Teorisi ve Marksizm, (Çev. Onur Karahanoğuları), Birikim Yayınları, İstanbul.
27. Ranciere, Jacques (2004), “Who is the Subject of the Rights of Man”, The South Atlantic Quarterly, 103:2/3, Spring/Summer, s. 297-310.
28. Roth, Brad R. (2008), “Marxian insights for the human rights project”, Marks, Susan (Ed.), International Law On The Left: Re-examining Marxist Legacies, Cambridge University Press, New York, s. 220-252.
29. Zizek, Slovaj (2005), “Against Human Rights”, New Left Review 34, July-Aug, s. 115- 131.