TRANSHÜMANİZM KARŞISINDA HUKUK DEVLETİ İDEALİ

Halim Alperen Çıtak

TRANSHÜMANİZM KARŞISINDA HUKUK DEVLETİ İDEALİ

Öz

Transhümanizm, bilim ve teknoloji vasıtasıyla homo sapiens türünün biyolojik ve bilişsel sınırlarını aşmayı hedefleyen felsefî, sosyal ve siyasî bir harekettir. Transhümanistlerin başlıca talepleri; yeni hak süjelerinin ihdası, morfolojik özgürlük, üreme özgürlüğü, tıbbî kavramların revize edilmesi ve ihtiyat ilkesinin yerine önetkinlik ilkesinin benimsenmesi (inovasyon özgürlüğü) şeklinde sıralanabilir. Modern hukuk devletinin özünü (maddî unsurlarını) oluşturan insan onuru, özgürlük ve eşitlik kavramları ise, hümanist dünya görüşü çerçevesinde şekillenmiştir. Bilimsel ve teknolojik gelişmelerin tetiklediği transhümanist talep ve pratikler, söz konusu üç kavramın her birini dönüştürme potansiyeline sahiptir. Bu makale; transhümanist talepler ve pratikler karşısında insan onuru, özgürlük ve eşitlik ideallerinin nasıl etkilenebileceğini konu edinmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ahmed, A. Kayum: “Delinking the ‘Human’ from Human Rights: Artificial Intelligence, Transhumanism and the Future of Human Rights”, Conference: The Social Practice of Human Rights, 1-4 October 2019, University of Dayton.
Akyılmaz, Bahtiyar / Sezginer, Murat / Kaya, Cemil: Türk İdare Hukuku, Savaş Yayınevi, Ankara, Eylül 2020.
Allhoff, Fritz: “Germ-Line Genetic Enhancement and Rawlsian Primary Goods”, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, Volume 15, Number 1 (March 2005), s. 39-56.
Allhoff, Fritz / Lin, Patrick / Moor, James / Weckert, John: “Ethics of Human Enhancement: 25 Questions & Answers”, Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology, Volume 4, Issue 1 (2010), Article 4, s. 1-39.
Annas, George J.: American Bioethics: Crossing Human Rights and Health Law Boundaries, Oxford University Press, New York, 2005.
Bailey, Ronald: “For Enhancing People”, The Transhumanist Reader, (Edited by Max More and Natasha-Vita More), Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, 2013, s. 327-344.
Bainbridge, William Sims: “The Transhuman Heresy”, Journal of Evolution and Technology, Volume 14, Issue 2 (August 2005), s. 1-10.
Barber, Nicholas W.: “The Rechtsstaat and the Rule of Law”, The University of Toronto Law Journal, Volume 53, Issue 4 (Autumn 2003), s. 443-454.

Bardakçı, Tayyibe: İnsanı Geliştirmeye Yönelik Uygulamalar Üzerine Normatif Bir Analiz, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul, 2018.
Basl, John: “State Neutrality and the Ethics of Human Enhancement Technologies”, AJOB Neuroscience, Volume 1, Number 2 (April-June 2010), s. 41-48.
Baxi, Upendra: Human Rights in a Posthuman World, Oxford University Press, New Delhi, 2007.
Baumann, Fred: “Humanism and Transhumanism”, The New Atlantis, Number 29, Fall 2010, s. 68-84. (Erişim: https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/humanism-and-transhumanism, 28.05.2021).
Bloom, Peter: “Legal Reboot: From Human Control to Transhuman Possibilities”, Identity, Institutions and Governance in an AI World: Transhuman Relations, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham (Switzerland), 2020, s. 211-246.
Bostrom, Nick: “A History of Transhumanist Thought”, Journal of Evolution and Technology, Volume 14, Issue 1 (April 2005), s. 1-25. (Erişim: https://www.nickbostrom.com/papers/history.pdf, 17.12.2020).
Bostrom, Nick: “Dignity and Enhancement”, Human Dignity and Bioethics: Essays commissioned by the President’s Council on Bioethics, President’s Council on Bioethics, Washington D.C., March 2008, s. 173-206.
Bostrom, Nick: “In Defense of Posthuman Dignity”, Bioethics, Volume 19, Number 3 (2005), s. 202-214.
Bostrom, Nick: “Human Genetic Enhancements: A Transhumanist Perspective”, The Journal of Value Inquiry, Volume 37, Issue 4 (December 2003), s. 493-506. (Genetic).
Bostrom, Nick: “Transhumanist Values”, Ethical Issues for the 21st Century, (Edited by Frederick Adams), Philosophical Documentation Center Press, 2003, s. 3-14. (Erişim:https://www.nickbostrom.com/ethics/values.pdf, 17.12.2020).
Bourgois, Pierre: “Une critique politique du transhumanisme : le bioconservatisme de Francis Fukuyama”, Raisons Politiques, Volume: 74, Numéro: 2 (2019), s. 119-132.
Bourguignon, Didier: The Precautionary Principle: Definitions, Applications and Governance, European Parliamentary Research Service - European Union, 2016.
Brand, Steward: Whole Earth Discipline, Penguin Books, New York, 2009.
Brownsword, Roger: “Regulating Human Enhancement: Things Can Only Get Better?”, Law, Innovation and Technology, Year 1, Issue 1 (2009), s. 125-152.
Buchanan, Allen: “Enhancement and the Ethics of Development”, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, Volume 18, Number 1 (March 2008), s. 1-34.
Cartlidge, Edwin: (2012). “Meet the World’s First Transhumanist Politician”, New Scientist, Volume 215, Issue 2882, 2012, s. 25.
“Constitution of the United States Transhumanist Party”, (Erişim: http://transhumanist-party.org/constitution/, 24.12.2020).
Cordeiro, José Luis: “The Boundaries of the Human: From Humanism to Transhumanism”, The Transhumanism Handbook, (Editor: Newton Lee), Springer, Cham (Switzerland), 2019, s.63-74.
Dağ, Ahmet: Transhümanizm: İnsanın ve Dünyanın Dönüşümü, Elis Yayınları, Ankara, 2008.
Dağ, Ahmet: “Hümanizmin Radikalleşmesi Olarak Transhümanizm”, Felsefî Düşün, Sayı: 9 (Ekim 2017), s. 46-68.
Dingwall, Robert: “Shaping the Future of Humankind: Three Commentaries on the Ethics of Enhancement”, Health Economics, Policy and Law, Volume 3, Issue 1 (January 2008), s. 97-105.
Doyle, John D.: What Does it Mean to be Human? Life, Death, Personhood and the Transhumanist Movement, Springer, Cham (Switzerland), 2018.
European Commission: Communication from the Commission on the Precautionary Principle, COM(2000) 1, (Erişim: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52000DC0001, 03.01.2021). European Parliament Science and Technology Options Assessment (STOA): Human Enhancement, (Study), Brussels, 2009.
Fabre-Magnan, Muriel: “La dignité en droit : un axiome”, Revue interdisciplinaire d'études juridiques, Volume 58, Numéro 1 (2007), s. 1-30.
Fenton, Elizabeth: “Genetic Enhancement: A Threat to Human Rights?”, Bioethics, Volume 22, Number 1 (2008), s. 1-7.
Ferrando, Francesca: “Transhumanism / Posthumanism”, Posthuman Glossary, (Edited by Rosi Braidotti and Maria Hlavajova), Bloomsbury Publishing, London-New York, 2018, s. 438-439.
FM-2030: Are You a Transhuman?, Warner Books, New York, 1989.
FM-2030: “Are You Transhuman?”, University of California, 06.02.1994, (Erişim: https://youtu.be/eaS9QBdVHMs, 18.12.2020).
Franco, Alexandra M.: “Transhuman Babies and Human Pariahs: Genetic Engineering, Transhumanism, Society and the Law”, Children’s Legal Rights Journal, Volume 37, Issue 2 (2017), s. 185-218.
Freitas, Robert A.: Nanomedicine (Volume I: Basic Capabilities), Landes Bioscience, Georgetown, 1999. Fukuyama, Francis: Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, 2002.
Fukuyama, Francis: “Transhumanism”, Foreign Policy, Number 144 (September - October 2004), s. 42-43. Fuller, Steve / Lipinska, Veronika: The Proactionary Imperative: A Foundation for Transhumanism, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2014.
Fuller, Steve: “Morphological Freedom and the Question of Responsibility and Representation in Transhumanism”, Confero: Essays on Education Philosophy and Politics, Volume 4, Issue 2 (December 2016), s. 33-45.
Fuller, Steve: “Transhumanism and the Dialectics of Progressivism”, The Sociological Review (Website), 08.01.2017, (Erişim: https://www.thesociologicalreview.com/transhumanism-and-the-dialectics-of-progressivism/, 15.12.2020).
Goffi, Jean-Yves: “From Better than Well to More than Human”, Naturalism in the Philosophy of Health: Issues and Implications, (Editor: Élodie Giroux), Springer, Switzerland, 2016, s. 179-197.
Habermas, Jürgen: The Future of Human Nature, Polity Press, Cambridge, 2003.
Hansell, Gregory R. / Grassie, William: “Humans Plus or Minus (H±): An Introduction”, Transhumanism and Its Critics, (Edited by Gregory R. Hansell and William Grassie), Metanexus Institute, Philadelphia, 2010, s. 13-15.
Harari, Yuval Noah: Homo Deus: Yarının Kısa Bir Tarihi, (Çeviren: Poyzan Nur Taneli), Kolektif Kitap, İstanbul, Nisan 2020 (21. Baskı).
Harris, John: Enhancing Evolution: The Ethical Case for Making Better People, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 2007.
Harris, John: “Moral Enhancement and Freedom”, Bioethics, Volume 25, Number 2 (2011), s. 102–111. Hays, Sean A.: “Transhumanism”, Encyclopædia Britannica, Yayın Tarihi: 12.06.2018, (Erişim: https://www.britannica.com/topic/transhumanism, 17.12.2020).
Heckathorne, Craig: “Cyborg”, Encyclopædia Britannica, Yayın Tarihi: 15.07.2019, (Erişim: https://www.britannica.com/topic/cyborg, 28.12.2020).
Hopkins, Patrick D.: “Is Enhancement Worthy of Being a Right?”, The Transhumanist Reader, (Edited by Max More and Natasha-Vita More), Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, 2013, s. 345-354.
Hughes, James: Citizen Cyborg: Why Democratic Societies Must Respond to the Redesigned Human of the Future, Westview Press, Cambridge, 2004 (Citizen).
Hughes, James: “Politics”, Beyond Humanism: Trans- and Posthumanism - 1, (Edited by Robert Ranisch and Stefan Lorenz Sorgner), Peter Lang Edition, Frankfurt am Main, 2014, s. 133-148.
Hughes, James: “The Politics of Transhumanism and the Techno-Millennial Imagination (1626–2030)”, Zygon, Volume 47, Issue 4 (December 2012), s. 757-776.
Hughes, James: “Transhumanism and Personal Identity”, The Transhumanist Reader, (Edited by Max More and Natasha-Vita More), Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, 2013, s. 227-233.
Huxley, Julian: New Bottles for New Wine, Chatto and Windus Publishing, London, 1957. International Theological Commission: Communion and Stewardship: Human Persons Created in the Image of God, Vatican, 2002.
Jotterand, Francis: “Human Dignity and Transhumanism: Do Anthro-Technological Devices Have Moral Status?”, The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 10, Issue 7 (2010), s. 45-52.
Junker-Kenny, Maureen: “Genetic Enhancement as Care or as Domination? The Ethics of Asymmetrical Relationships in the Upbringing of Children”, Journal of Philosophy of Education, Volume 39, Issue 1 (February 2005), s. 1-17.
Kapani, Münci: Kamu Hürriyetleri, Yetkin Hukuk Yayınları, Ankara, 2013.
Kass, Leon: Life, Liberty and the Defense of Dignity: The Challenge for Bioethics, Encounter Books, California, 2002.
Kuçuradi, İonna: İnsan Hakları: Kavramları ve Sorunları, Türkiye Felsefe Kurumu, Ankara, 2016.
Kurek, Camille: “Le transhumanisme en droit pénal”, Les cahiers de la justice, 2018, s. 541. (Dalloz veri tabanından ulaşılan makalelerde yalnızca yıl bilgisi ve ilk sayfa numarası yer almaktadır).
Kurt, İsmail: Transhümanizm ve Tekillik Bağlamında Dinin Geleceği, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Konya 2019.
Kurzweil, Ray: “Get Ready for Hybrid Thinking”, TED Talks, March 2014, (Erişim: https://www.ted.com/talks/ray_kurzweil_get_ready_for_hybrid_thinking/transcript, 18.12.2020).
Lee, Newton: “Brave New World of Transhumanism”, The Transhumanism Handbook, (Editor: Newton Lee), Springer, Cham (Switzerland), 2019, s. 3-48.
Levin, Susan B.: “Playing to Lose: Transhumanism, Autonomy, and Liberal Democracy”, OUPblog (Oxford University Press's Academic Insights for the Thinking World), 09.01.2021, (Erişim: https://blog.oup.com/2021/01/playing-to-lose-transhumanism-autonomy-and-liberal-democracy-long-read/, 03.02.2021).
Lilley, Stephen: Transhumanism and Society: The Social Debate over Human Enhancement, Springer, Dordrecht, 2013.
Mazarakis, John: “The Grand Narratives of Democratic and Libertarian Transhumanism: A Lyotardian Approach to Transhumanist Politics”, Confero: Essays on Education Philosophy and Politics, Volume 4, Issue 2 (December 2016), s. 11-31.
McGee, Ellen M.: “Toward Regulating Human Enhancement Technologies”, AJOB Neuroscience, Volume 1, Number 2 (April-June 2010), s. 49-50.
Mehlman, Maxwell J., “Extinction by Design”, Oklahoma City University Law Review, Volume 38, Number 2 (Summer 2013), s. 233-248.
More, Max: “Transhumanism: Towards a Futurist Philosophy”, Extropy Magazine, Volume 4, Number 1, 1990, s. 6-13. (Erişim: https://web.archive.org/web/20051029125153/http://www.maxmore.com/transhum.htm, 17.12.2020).
More, Max: “The Philosophy of Transhumanism”, The Transhumanist Reader, (Edited by Max More and Natasha-Vita More), Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, 2013, s. 3-17. (Philosophy).
More, Max: “The Proactionary Principle: Optimizing Technological Outcomes”, The Transhumanist Reader, (Edited by Max More and Natasha-Vita More), Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, 2013, s. 258-267. (Proactionary).
Nietzsche, Friedrich: Thus Spoke Zarathustra, (Edited by Adrian Del Caro and Robert Pippin), Cambridge University Press, New York, 2006.
Nuffield Council on Bioethics: Genome Editing and Human Reproduction, London, July 2018, (Erişim: https://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/assets/pdfs/Genome-editing-and-human-reproduction-report.pdf, 21.01.2021).
Özenç, Ardeniz: “Eski Bilim Yeni Bilime Karşı: Simyacılık ve Transhümanizm”, Transhümanizm ve Karşılaştırmalı İzdüşümü, (Editör: Timuçin Buğra Edman), Kastaş Yayınevi, İstanbul, 2019, s. 65-99.
“Performance Enhancement and Legal Theory” (An Interview with Professor Michael H. Shapiro), The Transhumanist Reader, (Edited by Max More and Natasha-Vita More), Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, 2013, s. 281-290.
Prisco, Guilo: “Italy Elects First Transhumanist MP”, 26.08.2012, (Erişim: https://www.kurzweilai.net/italy-elects-first-transhumanist-mp, 24.12.2020).
Ranisch, Robert / Sorgner, Stefan Lorenz: “Introducing Post- and Transhumanism”, Beyond Humanism: Trans- and Posthumanism - 1, (Edited by Robert Ranisch and Stefan Lorenz Sorgner), Peter Lang Edition, Frankfurt am Main, 2014, s. 7-27.
Ranisch, Robert: “Morality”, Beyond Humanism: Trans- and Posthumanism - 1, (Edited by Robert Ranisch and Stefan Lorenz Sorgner), Peter Lang Edition, Frankfurt am Main, 2014, s. 149-172.
Rao, Neomi: “The Three Concepts of Dignity in Constitutional Law”, Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 86, Issue 1 (January 2011), s. 183-271.
Rawls, John: A Theory of Justice, Oxford University Press, 1972.
Rubin, Charles: “Human Dignity and the Future of Man”, Human Dignity and Bioethics: Essays commissioned by the President’s Council on Bioethics, President’s Council on Bioethics, Washington D.C., March 2008, s. 155-172.
Sadeeq, Sara: “Tarih, Mitler ve Antik Transhümanizm”, Transhümanizm ve Karşılaştırmalı İzdüşümü, (Editör: Timuçin Buğra Edman), Kastaş Yayınevi, İstanbul, 2019, s. 26-38.
Sánchez, Cristina: “Transhumanismo en política: ¿votarías por ser un cíborg que vive eternamente?”, elDiario, 03.06.2015, (Erişim: https://www.eldiario.es/hojaderouter/tecnologia/partido-transhumanista-politica-robots-ciborgs-tecnologia_1_2648098.html, 24.12.2020).
Sandberg, Anders: “Morphological Freedom - Why We Not Just Want It, but Need It”, The Transhumanist Reader, (Edited by Max More and Natasha-Vita More), Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, 2013, s. 56-64.
Sandro, Paolo: “An Axiomatic Theory of Law”, Res Publica, Volume 17, Issue 4 (November 2011), s. 343-354.
Savulescu, Julian: “Procreative Beneficience: Why We Should Select the Best Children”, Bioethics, Volume 15, Number 5/6 (2001), s. 413-426.
Savulescu, Julian / Persson, Ingmar: “Moral Enhancement, Freedom, and the God Machine”, The Monist, Volume 95, Issue 3, (July 2012), s. 399–421.
Shapiro, Michael H.: "Does Technological Enhancement of Human Traits Threaten Human Equality and Democracy?", San Diego Law Review, Volume 39, Number 3 (August-September 2002), s. 769-842.
Snead, Carter: “Human Dignity in US Law”, The Cambridge Handbook of Human Dignity, (Edited by Marcus Düwell, Jens Braarvig, Roger Brownsword, Dietmar Mieth), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014, s. 386-393.
“Sorites Paradox”, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (Erişim: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/sorites-paradox/, 18.09.2020).
Stock, Gregory: “The Battle for the Future”, The Transhumanist Reader, (Edited by Max More and Natasha-Vita More), Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, 2013, s. 302-316.
Szabados, Krisztián: Transhumanism as a Thin-centred Ideology, (PhD Dissertation), Budapest, June 2020.
Tamanaha, Brian Z.: On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2004, s. 4.
The Science and Environmental Health Network: “Wingspread Statement on the Precautionary Principle”, January 1998, (Erişim: https://www.sehn.org/precautionary-principle-understanding-science-in-regulation, 03.01.2021).
Thomasset, Flore: “Transhumanisme : Les droits de l’homme accompagnent l’homme nouveau”, Entretien avec Grégor Puppinck, La Croix, 31.10.2014, (Erişim: https://www.la-croix.com/Ethique/Medecine/Transhumanisme-Les-droits-de-l-homme-accompagnent-l-homme-nouveau-2014-10-31-1229917, 15.09.2020).
“Transhumanism”, Cambridge Dictionary, (Erişim: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/, 10.12.2020).
“Transhumanism: Nick Bostrom and David Pearce Talk to Andrés Lomeña”, Literal, Issue 31 (Winter 2012-2013), s. 5-8, (Erişim: https://literalmagazine.com/assets/l31-web.pdf, 01.01.2021).
“Transhumanist Bill of Rights - Version 3.0”, (Erişim: https://transhumanist-party.org/tbr-3/, 28.12.2020).
“Transhumanist Declaration”, (Erişim: https://humanityplus.org/philosophy/transhumanist-declaration/, 28.12.2020).
Turgut, Nükhet: “İhtiyat İlkesi”, Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 45, Sayı 1 (Mayıs 1996), s. 67-102.
UNESCO World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology: The Precautionary Principle, UNESCO, Paris, 2005.
UNESCO: Report of the IBC on Updating Its Reflection on the Human Genome and Human Rights, Paris, 2 October 2015, (Erişim: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000233258, 21.01.2021).
Uygun, Oktay: Devlet Teorisi, On İki Levha Yayıncılık, İstanbul, Eylül 2014.
Van Beers, Britta C.: “Rewriting the Human Genome, Rewriting Human Rights Law? Human Rights, Human Dignity, and Human Germline Modification in the CRISPR Era”, Journal of Law and the Biosciences, Isaa006, (Published on 9 June 2020), s. 1-36.
Varga, Csaba: “The Quest for Formalism in Law: Ideals of Systemicity and Axiomatisability between Utopianism and Heuristic Assertion”, Acta Juridica Hungarica, Volume 50, Number 1, s. 1-30.
Varvaštian, Samvel: “UK’s Legalisation of Mitochondrial Donation in IVF Treatment: A Challenge to the International Community or a Promotion of Life-saving Medical Innovation to Be Followed by Others?”, European Journal of Health Law, Volume 22, Issue 5 (December 2015), s. 405-425.
Vauchez-Hennette, Stéphanie: “Human Dignity in French Law”, The Cambridge Handbook of Human Dignity, (Edited by Marcus Düwell, Jens Braarvig, Roger Brownsword, Dietmar Mieth), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014, s. 368-374.
Vita-More, Natasha: “The History of Transhumanism”, The Transhumanism Handbook, (Editor: Newton Lee), Springer, Cham (Switzerland), 2019, s. 49-62.
Weiss, Martin: “Posthuman Dignity”, The Cambridge Handbook of Human Dignity, (Edited by Marcus Düwell, Jens Braarvig, Roger Brownsword, Dietmar Mieth), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014, s. 319-331.
Wittes, Benjamin / Chong, Jane: “Our Cyborg Future: Law and Policy Implications”, Center for Technology Innovation at Brookings (Report), September 2014, s. 2, (Erişim: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/cyborg_future_law_policy_implications_FINAL.pdf, 07.02.2021).
Yıldırım, Abdurrahman Ali: Tıp Hukuku Bağlamında İnsanı Geliştiren Biyoteknoloji Uygulamaları, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul, 2019.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Hukuk

Bölüm

Teorik Makale

Yazarlar

Halim Alperen Çıtak
0000-0001-8355-4815
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

12 Ağustos 2021

Gönderilme Tarihi

14 Şubat 2021

Kabul Tarihi

13 Nisan 2021

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2020 Cilt: 38

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA35LN44XE

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Çıtak, H. A. (2021). TRANSHÜMANİZM KARŞISINDA HUKUK DEVLETİ İDEALİ. İnsan Hakları Yıllığı, 38, 1-40. https://izlik.org/JA35LN44XE

AMA

1.Çıtak HA. TRANSHÜMANİZM KARŞISINDA HUKUK DEVLETİ İDEALİ. İnsan Hakları Yıllığı. 2021;38:1-40. https://izlik.org/JA35LN44XE

Chicago

Çıtak, Halim Alperen. 2021. “TRANSHÜMANİZM KARŞISINDA HUKUK DEVLETİ İDEALİ”. İnsan Hakları Yıllığı 38 (Ağustos): 1-40. https://izlik.org/JA35LN44XE.

EndNote

Çıtak HA (01 Ağustos 2021) TRANSHÜMANİZM KARŞISINDA HUKUK DEVLETİ İDEALİ. İnsan Hakları Yıllığı 38 1–40.

IEEE

[1]H. A. Çıtak, “TRANSHÜMANİZM KARŞISINDA HUKUK DEVLETİ İDEALİ”, İnsan Hakları Yıllığı, c. 38, ss. 1–40, Ağu. 2021, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA35LN44XE

ISNAD

Çıtak, Halim Alperen. “TRANSHÜMANİZM KARŞISINDA HUKUK DEVLETİ İDEALİ”. İnsan Hakları Yıllığı 38 (01 Ağustos 2021): 1-40. https://izlik.org/JA35LN44XE.

JAMA

1.Çıtak HA. TRANSHÜMANİZM KARŞISINDA HUKUK DEVLETİ İDEALİ. İnsan Hakları Yıllığı. 2021;38:1–40.

MLA

Çıtak, Halim Alperen. “TRANSHÜMANİZM KARŞISINDA HUKUK DEVLETİ İDEALİ”. İnsan Hakları Yıllığı, c. 38, Ağustos 2021, ss. 1-40, https://izlik.org/JA35LN44XE.

Vancouver

1.Halim Alperen Çıtak. TRANSHÜMANİZM KARŞISINDA HUKUK DEVLETİ İDEALİ. İnsan Hakları Yıllığı [Internet]. 01 Ağustos 2021;38:1-40. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA35LN44XE