Biyoekonomi İçin Sürdürülebilir Tedarik Zincirleri: Tarımsal Biyokütle ile İlgili Projeler ve Literatür Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Öz

Fosil kaynaklara dayalı malzemelerin biyomateryaller ile, enerji üretiminin ise biyoyakıtlarla veya biyokütle kaynaklarından direkt enerji üretilmesi ile ikame edilmesine dayanan biyoekonomi, döngüsel ekonomide önemli bir yere sahiptir. Biyoekonominin potansiyelinden tam olarak faydalanabilmek için sürdürülebilir tedarik zincirleri gereklidir. Bu çalışma, Türkiye'deki kullanılmayan biyokütle potansiyelinden yararlanabilmek için teorik bir çerçeve sunmayı amaçlamıştır. Biyokütle ve biyoenerji projeleri, alternatif konseptler ve tarımsal biyokütle kaynaklarından yararlanan iş modelleri geliştirmeye yönelik bütünsel bir yaklaşımla yürütülecek gelecekteki çalışmalar için amaca uygun literatüre odaklanılmış ve döngüsel bir biyoekonomi için gerekli olan sürdürülebilir tedarik zincirleri için kavramsal bir çerçevenin geliştirilmesi hedeflenmiştir. Araştırmalar, Avrupa'da biyoekonomi kapsamındaki pek çok projenin, çoğunlukla işbirlikçi bir anlayışla yürütüldüğünü ve AB politikaları doğrultusunda finansman mekanizmalarıyla desteklendiğini açıkça göstermektedir. Türkiye'de de benzer şekilde daha fazla düzenleyici politika geliştirilmeli, farkındalık artırılmalı ve tüm sektör paydaşlarını içeren uygulamaya yönelik inovasyon projeleri geliştirilmelidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Döngüsel Ekonomi
• Biyoekonomi
• Biyoenerji
• Biyokütle Tedarik Zincirleri
• Tarımsal Kalıntılar

Sustainable Supply Chains for Bioeconomy: A Survey on Projects and Literature on Agro-Biomass

Öz

Bioeconomy, which is based on the replacement of materials and energy production based on fossil resources with biomaterials and/or biofuels or energy generation from biomass resources, has an important place in the circular economy. Sustainable supply chains are essential to meet bioeconomy’s full potential. This study aimed to provide a theoretical framework to make use of the untapped biomass potential in Turkey. Study focused on the literature fit for purpose for the further studies to be executed for building a holistic approach on developing biomass and bioenergy projects, alternative concepts and business models utilizing agro-biomass resources and developing a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chains for a circular bioeconomy. Research clearly shows that many projects are executed within the scope of bioeconomy in Europe, mostly with a collaborative sense, and are supported by funding mechanisms in line with EU policies. In Turkey, more regulatory policies should be developed, awareness should be raised, and application-oriented innovation projects should be developed, involving all sector stakeholders.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Circular Economy
• Bioeconomy
• Bioenergy
• Biomass Supply Chains
• Agricultural Residues

Kaynakça

1. Aalto, M., Korpinen, O. et al. (2017). Dynamic Simulation of Bioenergy Facility Locations with Large Geographical Datasets- A Case Study in European Region. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov.
2. Adams, P., Bridgwater T. et al. (2018). Chapter 8 - Biomass Conversion Technologies, Greenhouse Gas Balances of Bioenergy Systems, Academic Press, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-101036-5.00008-2
3. AgroInLog Project (2022). Integrated Biomass Logistic Centres (IBLC) for the Agro Industry, Accessed through http://agroinlog-h2020.eu/en/public-deliverables/
4. Alakangas, E., Wiik, C. & Vesterinen, P. (2008). VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, EUBIONET II. Efficient trading of biomass fuels and analysis of fuel supply chains and business models for market actors by networking. Final result-oriented report.
5. Annevelink, B., Garcia Galindo, D., Espatolero, S., Staritsky, I., Vanmeulebrouk, B. (2017). Logistical Case Study for the Aragón Region Using the Locagistics Tool, Biomass Feedstock, Residues and By-products, 25th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, 12–15 June 2017, Stockholm, Sweden, 1AO.7.1, 41 – 47, 978-88-89407-17-2, doi:10.5071/25thEUBCE2017-1AO.7.1
6. Annevelink, B., Gogh, B., Nogués, F., et al. (2017). Conceptual description of an integrated biomass logistics centre (IBLC).
7. Athanasios, A.R., Athanasios J.T., Ilias P. Tatsiopoulos, I.P. (2009). Logistics issues of biomass: The storage problem and the multi-biomass supply chain, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages 887-894, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2008.01.003.
8. Balaman Ş.Y. (2014). A Fuzzy Goal Programming Based Decision Support System for Design and Management of Biomass to Energy Supply Chains, PhD Thesis, Dokuz Eylül University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Accessed through https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/TezGoster?key=48XPj7KKQhKUgntkUiKO3CjxiBgVUNZhOClAuekjb-hL4-dWj0F4fU9qWZStB5uf

9. Bio-based Industries Consortium (BIC) (2022). Bio-Based Industries Joint Undertaking, FAQ, what is the BBI? Accessed through https://www.bbi.europa.eu/faq/what-bbi
10. Bio-based Industries Consortium (BIC) (2022). Bio-Based Industries Joint Undertaking, Projects, Accessed through https://www.bbi.europa.eu/projects
11. Bioenergy Europe (2022). AgroBioHeat Project, Agrobiomass: A Rural Solution in the Green Transformation, Presentation, Accessed through http://www.agrobioheat.eu
12. Circular Bio-based Europe Joint Undertaking (2022). The Organization, Accessed through https://www.cbe.europa.eu/organisation
13. Devrim, M.Y., Van Duren, I. et al. (2016). Design of sustainable second-generation biomass supply chains. Biomass and Bioenergy. 94. 173-186. 10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.08.004.
14. Ellen Macarthur Foundation (2022). Circular Economy Introduction: Overview, Accessed through https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/topics/circular-economy-introduction/overview
15. European Commission (2019). Bioeconomy: The European way to use our natural resources: action plan 2018, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Publications Office, 2019, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/79401 European Commission (2009). Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, On the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources and Amending and Subsequently Repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC, L 140/16, Official Journal of the European Union (2009)
16. European Commission (2019). Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, The European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development: Bioeconomy: projects brochure, Di Federico, E.(editor), Publications Office, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2762/830078
17. European Commission (2022). Biomass Resources in Agriculture, A Report from Directorate - General for Agriculture and Rural Development, Accessed through https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/sustainability/economic-sustainability/bioeconomy/agricultural-biomass_en
18. European Commission (2022). EU Bioeconomy Strategy Progress Report, European Bioeconomy Policy: Stocktaking and Future Developments, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, doi:10.2777/29289 European Environment Agency (2018). Report No 8/2018, The Circular Economy and the Bioeconomy Partners in Sustainability, doi:10.2800/02937
19. EuroPruning Project (2016). Development & Implementation of a New & Non-existent, Logistics Chain for Biomass from Pruning, Project Final Report, Accessed through https://cordis.europa.eu/docs/results/312/312078/final1-europruning-final-report-publishable-summary.pdf
20. Frombo, F., Minciardi, R. et al. (2009). A decision support system for planning biomass-based energy production. Energy. 34. 362-369. 10.1016/j.energy.2008.10.012.
21. German Bioeconomy Council (2022). Bioeconomy - Shaping a Sustainable Future Together, 1st Working Paper of the III German Bioeconomy Council, Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
22. Giampietro, M. (2019). On the Circular Bioeconomy and Decoupling: Implications for Sustainable Growth, Ecological Economics, Volume 162, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.05.001
23. Heinimö, J. & Junginger, M. (2009). Production and trading of biomass for energy – An overview of the global status. Biomass and Bioenergy. 33. 1310-1320. 10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.05.017.
24. Iakovou, E., Karagiannidis, A. et al. (2010). Waste biomass-to-energy supply chain management: A critical synthesis. Waste management (New York, N.Y.). 30. 1860-70. 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.02.030.
25. Khwaja, C. et al. (2015). Triggering the creation of biomass logistic centres by the agro-industry – Proceedings of the 23rd European Biomass Conference and Exhibition in Vienna, Austria, p.1722-1727.
26. Kies, U., Reumerman P. et al. (2018). Summary Report, SecureChain: Small and medium enterprises securing future-proof bioenergy chains, doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.36351.10403.
27. Kougioumtzis, M.A., Karampinis, E., Grammelis, P., Kakaras, E. (2018). Assessment of biomass resources for an integrated biomass logistics center (IBLC) operating in the olive oil sector. 26th European Biomass Conference & Exhibition (EUBCE), Copenhagen, Denmark. Https://doi.org/10.5071/26thEUBCE2018-1DV.1.14
28. Lautala, P., Hilliard, M. et al. (2015). Opportunities and Challenges in the Design and Analysis of Biomass Supply Chains. Environmental management. 56. 10.1007/s00267-015-0565-2.
29. Lucile, G., Marion, D., Hélène P. (2022). Biomass Supply Chains Development in Rural Areas, How to Take Public Stakeholders' Needs and Expectations into Account? Biomass Policies, Markets and Sustainability, Sustainability and Socio-economic Aspects, Agro-Transfert Ressources et Territoire, Accessed through http://www.agro-transfert-rt.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Biomass-supply-chains-development-in-rural-areas-how-to-take-public-stakeholders%E2%80%99-needs-and-expectations-into-account.pdf
30. Manzanares, P., Ruiz, E. et.al. (2017). Residual biomass potential in olive tree cultivation and olive oil industry in Spain: Valorization proposal in a biorefinery context. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research. 15. e0206. 10.5424/sjar/2017153-10868.
31. Menéndez, J. A., Fernández-Tresguerres, L. et al. (2018). Report on the availability of Biomass Sources in Spain, Vineyards and Olive Groves. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.32722.66242.
32. Morales-Rincon, L., Martínez, A. et al. (2015). GIS-Based Methodology for Optimum Location of Biomass Extraction Plants and Power Plants Using Both Logistic Criteria and Agricultural Suitability Criteria. 10.1007/978-3-319-20092-7.
33. Pantaleo, A., Carone, M., Pellerano, A. (2012). Olive residues to energy chains in the Apulia region part I: biomass potentials and costs. Journal of Agricultural Engineering. 40. 10.4081/jae.2009.1.37.
34. Perpiñá Castillo, C., Alfonso, D. et al. (2009). Methodology based on Geographic Information Systems for biomass logistics and transport optimization. Renewable Energy. 34. 555-565. 10.1016/j.renene.2008.05.047.
35. Ravula, P., Grisso, R. & Cundiff, J. (2008). Cotton logistics as a model for a biomass transportation system. Biomass and Bioenergy. 32. 314-325. 10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.10.016.
36. Rudi, A., Müller, AK., Fröhling, M. et al. (2017). Biomass Value Chain Design: A Case Study of the Upper Rhine Region. Waste Biomass Valor 8, 2313–2327, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-016-9820-x
37. Ruiz, J., Juárez, M.C. et al. (2013). Biomass logistics: Financial & environmental costs. Case study: 2 MW electrical power plants. Biomass and Bioenergy. 56. 260–267. 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.05.014.
38. S2Biom Project (2016). About S2Biom, Accessed through https://www.s2biom.eu/en/about-s2biom.html
39. Sambra, A. & Sørensen, C. (2008). Optimized harvest and logistics for biomass supply chain. Proceedings of European Biomass Conference and Exhibition. Valencia, Spain.
40. Schroeder, P., Anggraeni, K. & Weber, U. (2019). The Relevance of Circular Economy Practices to the Sustainable Development Goals, Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol. 23, Issue 1, pp. 77-95, dx.doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12732
41. Sharma, B., Ingalls, R. et al. (2013). Biomass supply chain design and analysis: Basis, overview, modeling, challenges, and future. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 24. 608-627. 10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.049.
42. Springer Nature (2022). 5 Ways That Collaboration Can Further Your Research and Your Career, Accessed through https://www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/the-source/blog/blogposts-life-in-research/benefits-of-research-collaboration/17360752
43. Sucellog Project (2017). Triggering the Creation of Biomass Logistic Centres by the Agro-industry, Publications & Reports, Accessed through https://www.sucellog.eu/en/publications-reports.html
44. Sun, O., Fan, N. (2020). A Review on Optimization Methods for Biomass Supply Chain: Models and Algorithms, Sustainable Issues, and Challenges and Opportunities. Process Integr Optim Sustain 4, 203–226, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41660-020-00108-9
45. Tatsiopoulos, I. & Tolis, A. (2003). Economic aspects of the cotton-stalk biomass logistics and comparison of supply chain methods. Biomass and Bioenergy. 199-214. 10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00115-0.
46. The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) (2022). Integrated Biomass Supply and Logistics Model (IBSAL), Accessed through https://bioenergymodels.nrel.gov/models/31/
47. Van Kruchten, S. & Van Eijk, F. (2020). Circular Economy & SDGs - How Circular Economy Practices Help to Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals, Joint publication of Netherlands Enterprise Agency & Holland Circular Hotspot
48. Voivontas, D., Assimacopoulos, D., Koukios, E. (2001). Assessment of biomass potential for power production: A GIS based method. Biomass and Bioenergy. 20. 101-112. 10.1016/S0961-9534(00)00070-2.
49. Vos, J., Vikla K. et al. (2020). Project Deliverable, Lessons Learned from Earlier Projects WP2, Framework Conditions and Growth Potential for IBC, Market Uptake Support for Intermediate Bioenergy Carriers (MUSIC) Project, Accessed through www.music-h2020.eu
50. Vourdoubas, J. (2017). Possibilities of Energy Generation from Olive Tree Residues, by-products and Waste in Crete, Greece. Journal of Agricultural Studies. 5. 110. 10.5296/jas.v5i4.12114.
51. Wu, J., Wang, L. (2012). Economic Analysis Model for Biopower Plants Based on Biomass Logistics Networks and Its Application in Heilongjiang Province, China. Advanced Materials Research. 608-609. 356-360. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.608-609.356.