RESEARCH ON SUSTAINABLE CRITERIA AFFECTING THE LOGISTICS SECTOR

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 8 Sayı: Special Issue on International Symposium of Sustainable Logistics, 37 - 51, 23.09.2021

Emel Yontar

Öz

The understanding of sustainability can be applied in almost every sector, and has a very wide impact in the logistics sector. Today, taking into account the sustainability criteria is among the basic conditions of doing business for companies in the supply chain, and it is becoming more and more important. In this study, 15 articles that studied with sustainable logistics criteria between 2008 and 2020 are reviewed and the sustainable logistics criteria included in each study are determined. These 103 logistics criteria, which are determined, are ranked in importance by Pareto analysis, in consultation with expert academicians and logistics sector employees, and it is concluded that 33 criteria can be more important than others. These criteria are transport optimization, energy and fuel efficiency, production and distribution planning, environmental conditions, well-connected information and goods flows, internal resources efficiency, effectiveness, and utilization, selection of fuel type to be used, choice of mode of transport and intermodal transport, energy use, waste management, recycle efficiency, vehicle selection and efficiency, logistics cost optimization, using advanced technology and software in logistics activities, minimum energy consumption, economic factors, greenhouse gas emissions, reduced packaging, supply chain integration, consumer awareness studies, social factors, logistics competence, reverse logistics applications, government rules and regulations, sustainability behavioral cautiousness, use of recycled material, increasing awareness, organizational support, employee benefits, green packaging, consumer behavior, infrastructure, product value. With the understanding that it is possible to minimize the damage caused by the sector to the environment with an effective sustainability strategy, if these sustainable logistics criteria are given importance, logistics companies will reach a competitive level in the field of sustainability.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sustainable logistics, logistics criteria, sustainability, sustainable logistic literature review, pareto analysis

Kaynakça

• Abbasi, M., & Nilsson, F. (2016). Developing environmentally sustainable logistics: Exploring themes and challenges from a logistics service providers’ perspective. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 46, 273-283.
• Agrawal, S., & Singh, R. K. (2019). Analyzing disposition decisions for sustainable reverse logistics: Triple Bottom Line approach. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 150, 104448.
• Altuntaş, C., & Türker, D. (2012). Sustainable supply chains: A content analysis of sustainability reports. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14 (3), 39-64.
• Beken, H. G. (2016). Sürdürülebilirlik ve rekabet edebilirlik yolu yeşil lojistik mi. Balkan ve Yakın Doğu Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(01), 78-88.
• Byrne, P. J., Ryan, P., & Heavey, C. (2013). Sustainable logistics: a literature review and exploratory study of Irish based manufacturing organizations. International Journal of Engineering and Technology Innovation, 3(3), 200.
• Chung, C. J., & Wee, H. M. (2011). Short life-cycle deteriorating product remanufacturing in a green supply chain inventory control system. International Journal of Production Economics, 129(1), 195-203.
• Chunguang, Q., Xiaojuan, C., Kexi, W., & Pan, P. (2008, December). Research on green logistics and sustainable development. In 2008 International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering (Vol. 3, pp. 162-165). IEEE.
• Çamlıca, Z., & Akar, G. S. (2014). LOJİSTİK SEKTÖRÜNDE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK UYGULAMALARI. Gümüshane University Electronic Journal of the Institute of Social Science/Gümüshane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Elektronik Dergisi, 5(11).
• Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks – Triple bottom line of 21st century business. Stoney Creek, CT: New Society Publishers.
• Geiger, C. (2016). ICT in green freight logistics. In Green transportation logistics (pp. 205-241). Springer, Cham.
• Görgün ve Bardakçı, (2020) Green Logıstıcs And Applıcatıons Of Green Logıstıcs In Turkey Yeşil Lojistik Ve Türkiye’de Yeşil Lojistik Uygulamaları, 4th Internatıonal Zeugma Conference On Scıentıfıc Researches.
• Hazen, B. T., Hall, D. J., & Hanna, J. B. (2012). Reverse logistics disposition decision‐making. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management.
• Heizer, J., Render, B., & Munson, C. (2014). Operations Management-Sustainability and supply chain management (11. utg.). Essex: Pearson.
• Helm, M. D. (2018). Sustainable logistics as a source of competitive advantage in remote locations. Journal of Sustainable Development of Transport and Logistics, 3(3), 6-26. doi:10.14254/jsdtl.2018.3-3.1.
• Jack, E. P., Powers, T. L., & Skinner, L. (2010). Reverse logistics capabilities: antecedents and cost savings. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management.
• Jørsfeldt, L. M., Hvolby, H. H., Nguyen, V. T., (2016). “Implementing environmental sustainability in logistics operations: a case study” Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal, 9(2), s. 98-125.
• Krajewski, L. J., Ritzman, L. P., & Malhotra, M. K. (2013). Operations management: processes and supply chains (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Pearson.
• Lai, K. H., & Wong, C. W. (2012). Green logistics management and performance: Some empirical evidence from Chinese manufacturing exporters. Omega, 40(3), 267-282.
• Lambert, S., Riopel, D., & Abdul-Kader, W. (2011). A reverse logistics decisions conceptual framework. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 61(3), 561-581.
• Lin, C. Y., & Ho, Y. H. (2011). Determinants of green practice adoption for logistics companies in China. Journal of business ethics, 98(1), 67-83.
• Mayfield, 2021. https://www.blog.shippypro.com/sustainable-logistics/#:~:text=Sustainable%20logistics%20maintains%20the%20overarching,impact%20of%20all%20logistical%20activities.&text=Sustainability%20logistics%20provides%20mechanisms%20to,tree%2Dplanting%20and%20community%20involvement.
• Neto, J. Q. F., Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J. M., van Nunen, J. A., & van Heck, E. (2008). Designing and evaluating sustainable logistics networks. International journal of production economics, 111(2), 195-208.
• ois Arvis, J. F., l Raballand, G., & ois Marteau, J. F. (2010). The cost of being landlocked: Logistics costs and supply chain reliability. World Bank Publications.
• Özgüvenç, D. (2011). Kalite problemlerinin sınıflandırılmasında çok kriterli Pareto Analizi (Doctoral dissertation, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü).
• Pazirandeh, A., & Jafari, H. (2013). Making sense of green logistics. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management.
• Rashidi, K., & Cullinane, K. (2019). Evaluating the sustainability of national logistics performance using Data Envelopment Analysis. Transport Policy, 74, 35-46.
• WCED. (1987). Our common future. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Zhang, G., & Zhao, Z. (2012). Green packaging management of logistics enterprises. Physics Procedia, 24, 900-905.