Should Citizenship be For Sale?

Öz

Citizenship is traditionally defined as “the legal bond that connects the person to the state” in citizenship law. By the way of globalism “transnational” and “supranational” types of citizenship have been brought forward. European Union citizenship is an example of supranational citizenship. Transnational citizenship has been brought forward under different names along with globalization. It is basically a citizenship that is purchased with money or a citizenship based on property. Also long term residence permit can be obtained via “golden visa” and this right can create the right to naturalize. Although many conditions such as language, residence and integration have been required for naturalization, the persons who are called “mobile elite” acquire the new citizenship easily.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Citizenship,Selling,EU,Turkish Law

VATANDAŞLIK SATILABİLİR BİRŞEY MİDİR?

Öz

Vatandaşlık, geleneksel anlamıyla “kişiyi devlete bağlayan hukuki bağ” olarak tanımlanır. Küreselleşme sonucu “ulusötesi” ve “ulusüstü” vatandaşlık türleri ortaya çıkmıştır. Ulusüstü vatandaşlığa örnek, Avrupa Birliği vatandaşlığıdır. Ulusötesi vatandaşlık farklı isimlerle küreselleşme sürecinde ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu tür vatandaşlığın esası, parayla satın alınan ya da mülkiyete dayalı bir vatandaşlık anlayışıdır. Ayrıca “altın vize” yoluyla uzun süreli ikamet hakkı tanınabilmekte, bu hak daha sonra vatandaşlığa alınma hakkı yaratmaktadır. Normal yollarla vatandaşlığa alınmak için lisan bilmek, uzun süre oturmak, topluma entegrasyon gibi şartlar aranırken, “mobil elite” olarak adlandırılan bu kişilere kolayca vatandaşlık verilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Vatandaşlık,Satış,AB,Türk Hukuku

Kaynakça

1. AFET İNAN, Ayşe: Medeni Bilgiler ve M. Kemal Atatürk’ün El Yazıları, Ankara 1968.
2. AYBAY, Rona: Vatandaşlık Hukuku, İstanbul, 2003.
3. BAUBÖCK, Rainer: “Summary Global, European and National Questions About Price of Citizenship”, in (eds: SHACHAR, A./BAUBÖCK, R.) Should Citizenship be for Sale? RSCAS 2014/1, s. 1. http://eu.euRSCAS/Publications.
4. BAUDER, Harold: “Domicile citizenship, human mobility and territoriality”, Progress in Human Geography (2013), P. 1-16.
5. BECKER, Gary S.: “An Open Door for Immigrants; The auction”, Wall Strett Journal , 14 October 1992, P.A/1.
6. CAN, Hacı: Avrupa Birliği’nin Kurucu Andlaşmaları, Ankara 2009.
7. ÇELİKEL, Aysel/(ÖZTEKİN) GELGEL, Günseli: Yabancılar Hukuku, 23.bs, İstanbul 2017.
8. de WITTE, Floris: “The End of EU Citizenship and the Means of Non-Discrimination”, 18 Maastricht J. Eur & Comp. L. 1-2 (2011), p. 86-108.

9. DOĞAN Vahit: Türk Vatandaşlık Hukuku, 13. bs., Ankara 2016.
10. DŽANKİĆ, Jelena: “Investment-based citizenship and residence programmes in the EU”, Working paper RSCAS 2015/08.
11. FERRERA, Maurizo: “Kick off contribution, Should EU citizenship be duty free? in. eds: FERRERA, Maurizio/BAUBÖCK, Rainer: Should EU citizenship be duty free? EU Working Paper RSCAS 2017, P.1-13.
12. GÖĞER, Erdoğan, Türk Tabiiyet Hukuku, Ankara, 1979.
13. GÜNGÖR, Gülin: “Tabiiyet Hukuku, Gerçek Kişiler, Tüzel Kişiler, Şeyler, 3. bs., Ankara 2015.
14. HABERMAS, Jürgen: “Öteki” Olarak “Öteki”yle Yaşamak” (Çev. AKA, İlknur), 3.bs., İstanbul 2005.
15. ICJ Reports 1955, Nottebohm Case Liechtenstein v. Guetamala Judgment 09 April 6th 1955, s. 4 vd.
16. KARAYANNI, Michael: Conflicts in a Conflict, A Contlict of Laws Case Study on Israel and the Palestinian Territories, Oxford 2014.
17. KOCHENOV, Dimitry: “Two Sovereign States vs. A Human Being: ECJ as a Guardian of Arbitrariness in Citizenship Matters (April 20, 2010), in ( ed. Shaw, Jo), ‘Has the European Court of Justice Challenged the Member State Sovereignty in Nationality Law?’, EU Working Paper RSCAS 2011/62, P-11-16.
18. MULLINGTON, Tylor Alison: Countries where Money can buy your passport or elite residency (hhttp://uk.businessinsider.com) 3 July 2017, s. 4.
19. NOMER, Ergin: Türk Vatandaşlık Hukuku, 22.bs, İstanbul 2016.
20. OCHOA, Paulina: “What Money Can’t Buy: Face-to-Face Cooperation and Local Demotratic life”, in (eds: SHACHAR, A./BAUBÖCK, R.), Should Citizenship be forSale? WP RSCAS 2014/01.
21. OSMANAGAOĞLU, Cihan: “Tanzimat Dönemi İtibarıyla Osmanlı Tabiiyetinin (Vatandaşlığının) Gelişimi, İstanbul 2004.
22. ROUSSEAU, Jean: Jacques: Toplum Sözleşmesi (çeviren Vedat GÜNYOL), 7. bs., İstanbul 2011.
23. SANGIOVANNI, Andrea: “Feed them first then ask virtue of them: Broadering and deeping freedom of movement in (eds: FERRERA/BAUBÖCK) Should EU citizenship be duty-free? RSCAS 2017/60, P.15-19.
24. SEVİĞ, Muammer Raşit: Devletler Hususi Hukuku Devletler Hususi Hukuku, Cilt 1, İstanbul 1983.
25. SHACHAR, Ayelet: “Citizenship for Sale: A Thumbnail History”, The Oxford Handbook of Citizenship, (eds: SHACHAR, E./BAUBÖCK, R./BLOEMRAAD, I./VINK, M.), Aug. 2017, P. 790-810.
26. SHACHAR, Ayelet: “Dangerous Liasons: Money and Citizenship”, in (eds: SHACHAR, Ayelet/BAUBÖCK, Rainer) Should Citizenship for Sale?, http://www.eui.eu/RSCAS 2014/01.
27. SHACHAR, Ayelet: “The Race for Talent: Highly Skilled Migrants and Competetive Immigration Regimes”, NYU Law Review, 81 (2006), p. 148-206.
28. SPIRO, Peter: “Cash for passports and the end of citizenship” in (eds. SHACHAR, A./BAUBÖCK, R.), Should Citizenship be for Sale? WP RSCAS 2014/01.
29. ULUOCAK, Nihal: Türk Vatandaşlık Hukuku (Karşılaştırmalı-uygulamalı), İstanbul 1989.
30. UNAT, İlhan: Nottebohm Kararı ve Tabiiyetin Gerçekliği İlkesi, Ankara 1966.