Derleme

Battery selection criteria for electric vehicles: techno-economic analysis

Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2 30 Haziran 2023
PDF İndir
EN

Battery selection criteria for electric vehicles: techno-economic analysis

Öz

In this study, different battery types to be used in the conversion of a small and light (600-1000 kg) internal combustion engine vehicle into an electric vehicle were analyzed. The study was conducted to ensure that this vehicle is suitable for urban use and has a range of approximately 100 km. Each battery technology capacity is evaluated to be approximately 15 kWh. While performing the techno-economic analysis of different battery types, it was taken into account that they provide the necessary energy for about 10 years. Seven different battery technologies (lead-acid, gel, Ni-Cd, Li-Ion, LiFePo4, LiPo, Ni-MH) were used for comparison. In the analysis; price assessment in US Dollars ($), 10-year investment cost, weight and volume values, weight and volume values required to produce 1 kWh of energy were presented in tables. In addition to these, a review of battery life was made. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of battery technologies compared to each other are given. As a result of the study, it was seen that the cheapest technology for a 10-year lifespan was lead-acid technology. It has been determined that lead-acid technology is 30% cheaper than the second cheapest gel technology and 82% cheaper than the most expensive technology, LiPo technology. In the study, it was revealed that the lightest technology was LiPo. It has been determined that this technology is 85% lighter than gel technology. Besides this information, data on cycle life, self-discharge, advantages and disadvantages are presented in tabular form.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Ünlü, N., Karahan, Ş., Tür, O., Uçarol, H., Özsu, E., Yazar, A., Turhan, L., Akgün, F., Tırıs, M. “Elektrikli Araçlar,” TÜBİTAK Marmara Araştırma Merkezi Enerji Sistemleri ve Çevre Araştırma Enstitüsü, Gebze, Turkey, 2003.
  2. Sayın, A.A., Yüksel, İ. “Elektrikli Renault Fluence aracı, lityum- iyon bataryasının modellenmesi ve batarya yönetimi,” Mühendis ve Makine, 52, (616), 75-82, 2011.
  3. Chan, C.C. “The rise & fall of electric vehicles in 1828–1930: lessons learned,” Proceedings of the IEEE, 101 (1), 206 – 212, 2013.
  4. Can Güven, E., Gedik K., “Environmental Management of End-of-life Electric Vehicle Batteries” Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9 (2), 726-737, 2019.
  5. Adedeji, B. P., “A Novel Method for Estimating Parameters of Battery Electric Vehicles,” Intelligent Systems with Applications 15, 1-31, 2022.
  6. Bhosale, A. P., Bodke, K., Babhulkar, A., Amale, S., Mastud, S. A., & Chavan, A. B., “Materials Today: Proceedings Comparative environmental assessment of different battery technologies used for electric vehicles,” Materials Today: Proceedings, 2023.
  7. Xia, X., & Li, P., “A review of the life cycle assessment of electric vehicles: Considering the influence of batteries,” Science of the Total Environment, 814, 152870, 2022.
  8. Şenyürek, Ü., Soyhan, H. S., & Çelik, D. D. C., “Battery Caused Fires in Electric Vehicles,” Uluslararası Yakıtlar Yanma ve Yangın Dergisi, 10, (1), 21–27, 2022.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Hibrit ve Elektrikli Araçlar ve Güç Aktarma Organları

Bölüm

Derleme

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

15 Haziran 2023

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Haziran 2023

Gönderilme Tarihi

9 Aralık 2022

Kabul Tarihi

8 Nisan 2023

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2023 Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Yücenurşen, A., & Samancı, A. (2023). Battery selection criteria for electric vehicles: techno-economic analysis. International Journal of Automotive Engineering and Technologies, 12(2), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.18245/ijaet.1216888
AMA
1.Yücenurşen A, Samancı A. Battery selection criteria for electric vehicles: techno-economic analysis. International Journal of Automotive Engineering and Technologies. 2023;12(2):65-74. doi:10.18245/ijaet.1216888
Chicago
Yücenurşen, Alaattin, ve Ahmet Samancı. 2023. “Battery selection criteria for electric vehicles: techno-economic analysis”. International Journal of Automotive Engineering and Technologies 12 (2): 65-74. https://doi.org/10.18245/ijaet.1216888.
EndNote
Yücenurşen A, Samancı A (01 Haziran 2023) Battery selection criteria for electric vehicles: techno-economic analysis. International Journal of Automotive Engineering and Technologies 12 2 65–74.
IEEE
[1]A. Yücenurşen ve A. Samancı, “Battery selection criteria for electric vehicles: techno-economic analysis”, International Journal of Automotive Engineering and Technologies, c. 12, sy 2, ss. 65–74, Haz. 2023, doi: 10.18245/ijaet.1216888.
ISNAD
Yücenurşen, Alaattin - Samancı, Ahmet. “Battery selection criteria for electric vehicles: techno-economic analysis”. International Journal of Automotive Engineering and Technologies 12/2 (01 Haziran 2023): 65-74. https://doi.org/10.18245/ijaet.1216888.
JAMA
1.Yücenurşen A, Samancı A. Battery selection criteria for electric vehicles: techno-economic analysis. International Journal of Automotive Engineering and Technologies. 2023;12:65–74.
MLA
Yücenurşen, Alaattin, ve Ahmet Samancı. “Battery selection criteria for electric vehicles: techno-economic analysis”. International Journal of Automotive Engineering and Technologies, c. 12, sy 2, Haziran 2023, ss. 65-74, doi:10.18245/ijaet.1216888.
Vancouver
1.Alaattin Yücenurşen, Ahmet Samancı. Battery selection criteria for electric vehicles: techno-economic analysis. International Journal of Automotive Engineering and Technologies. 01 Haziran 2023;12(2):65-74. doi:10.18245/ijaet.1216888

Cited By