Atıktan Temiz Enerjiye: Atık Plastik Yağ Kullanılarak Motor Verimliliği ve Emisyonlarının Çok Amaçlı Optimizasyonu

Öz

Plastikler hafif, esnek ve kolay şekillendirilebilir olmaları gibi avantajlarından dolayı pek çok endüstride kullanılmaktadır. Günümüzde artan tüketim çılgınlığı nedeniyle plastik kullanımı her geçen yıl artmaktadır. Plastiklerin ortalama ömrü yaklaşık 10 yıl olmasına rağmen doğada kendiliğinden parçalanmaları yıllar almaktadır. Bu çalışmada, atık plastik kabloların yağa dönüştürülme potansiyeli araştırılmış ve bu yağın dizel ile karıştırılmasının motor performansı ve emisyonlar üzerindeki etkileri değerlendirilmiştir. Amaç, artan plastik atıklar ve fosil yakıt bağımlılığının neden olduğu çevre sorunlarına alternatif bir çözüm sunmaktır. Test yakıtları oluşturmak için, üretilen yağ dizel yakıtı ile üç farklı hacimsel oranda (%10, %20 ve %30) karıştırılmıştır. Bu test yakıtlarını test etmek için 4 zamanlı, hava soğutmalı, tek silindirli bir dizel motor kullanılmış ve 3000 dev/dak sabit hızda ve altı farklı yük altında (0,5, 1, 1,5, 2, 2,5 ve 3 kW) çalıştırılmıştır. Tepki yüzey metodolojisi (RSM) kullanılarak yapılan çalışmalardan elde edilen veriler kullanılarak ideal motor yükü 1,5 kW, ideal atık plastik yağ oranı ise %14 olarak alınmıştır. İdeal koşullar altında fren termal verimi (BTE) %23,17, fren özgül yakıt tüketimi (BSFC) 371,48 g/kWh, azot oksit (NOx) 495,96, karbondioksit (CO2) %5,29, hidrokarbon (HC) 21,93 ppm, karbon monoksit (CO) %0,049 olarak belirlenmiştir. Optimizasyon çalışmasında en düşük korelasyon katsayısı (R2) değeri %97,43 ile CO'ya aittir. En yüksek hata oranı %5,69 ile CO'ya, en düşük hata oranı ise %0,99 ile HC emisyonuna aittir. Kullanılmış plastik kablolardan elde edilen yağın dizel ile birleştirildiğinde faydalı olduğu görülmüştür. RSM etkin bir şekilde kullanılmış olup, yüksek R2 değerleri ve düşük hata oranları sergilemektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dizel motor
• RSM
• RSM
• Biyodizel
• Atıktan enerjiye
• Atık plastik yağ

Proje Numarası

KBÜBAP-22-YL-108.

From waste to clean energy: multi-objective optimization of engine efficiency and emissions using waste plastic oil

Öz

Plastics are used in a wide variety of industries due to their advantages such as being light, flexible, and easy to shape. Today, the use of plastics is increasing every year due to the increasing consumption frenzy. Although the average lifespan of plastics is approximately 10 years, it takes years for them to decompose in nature on their own. In this study, the potential of converting waste plastic cables into oil was investigated, and the effects of blending this oil with diesel on engine performance and emissions were evaluated. The aim is to offer an alternative solution to the environmental problems caused by increasing plastic waste and fossil fuel dependence. To create test fuels, the generated oil was combined with diesel fuel in three distinct volumetric ratios (10%, 20%, and 30%). A 4-stroke, air-cooled, single-cylinder diesel engine was used to test these test fuels at a constant speed of 3000 rpm while under six distinct loads (0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, and 3 kW). Utilizing the data from the studies utilizing the response surface methodology (RSM), the ideal engine load was 1.5 kW, and the ideal waste plastic oil ratio was 14%. Under ideal conditions, brake thermal efficiency (BTE) was determined to be 23.17%, brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC) to be 371.48 g/kWh, nitrogen oxide (NOx) to be 495.96, carbon dioxide (CO2) to be 5.29%, hydrocarbon (HC) to be 21.93 ppm, and carbon monoxide (CO) to be 0.049%. In the optimization study, the lowest correlation coefficient (R2) value belongs to CO with 97.43%. The highest error rate belongs to CO with 5.69%, and the lowest error rate belongs to HC emission with 0.99%. Oil extracted from used plastic cables has been found to be useful when combined with diesel. RSM has been effectively used, exhibiting high R2 values and low error rates.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Diesel engine
• Waste to energy
• RSM
• Waste Plastic Oil

Destekleyen Kurum

The Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Karabuk University

Proje Numarası

KBÜBAP-22-YL-108.

Kaynakça

1. T. Johnson and A. Joshi, “Review of Vehicle Engine Efficiency and Emissions,” SAE International Journal of Engines, vol. 11, pp. 1–29, 2018.
2. S. Sarıkoç, İ. Örs, and S. Ünalan, “An experimental study on energy-exergy analysis and sustainability index in a diesel engine with direct injection diesel-biodiesel-butanol fuel blends,” Fuel, vol. 268, pp 117321, 2020.
3. A. Savaş and L. Bilgili, “Emission Estimation of Ship Traffic in the Dardanelles,” Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Journal of Marine Sciences and Fisheries, vol. 5, pp. 80–85, 2022.
4. Savaş, L. Bilgili, S. Uslu, and R. Şener, “Life cycle assessment of jojoba (Simmondsia Chinensis) Biodiesel as a sustainable fuel for maritime decarbonization,” Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 200, pp 108040, 2025.
5. Y. Hua, “Research progress of higher alcohols as alternative fuels for compression ignition engines,” Fuel, vol. 357, pp 129749, 2024.
6. N. Yasmin and P. Grundmann, “Adoption and diffusion of renewable energy – The case of biogas as alternative fuel for cooking in Pakistan,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 101, pp. 255–264, 2019.
7. Vinoth Kanna and P. Paturu, “A study of hydrogen as an alternative fuel,” International Journal of Ambient Energy, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 1433–1436, 2020.
8. Savaş, R. Şener, S. Uslu, and O. Der, “Experimental study on performance and emission optimization of MgO nanoparticle-enriched 2nd generation biodiesel: A method for employing nanoparticles to improve cleaner diesel combustion,” Journal of the Energy Institute, vol. 120, pp 102024, 2025.

9. Godwin, V. Hariram, S. Sooryanarayanan, G. Siva Subramaniam, J. R. B. Osborn, A. Cyril Christo, et al., “Impact of varying the compression ratio on the combustion phenomenon of the diesel engine when fuelled with sesame biodiesel,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 33, pp. 3715–3721, 2020.
10. S. Simsek, “Effects of biodiesel obtained from Canola, safflower oils and waste oils on the engine performance and exhaust emissions,” Fuel, vol. 265, pp 117026, 2020.
11. D. Singh, D. Sharma, S. L. Soni, S. Sharma, P. K. Sharma, and A. Jhalani, “A review on feedstocks, production processes, and yield for different generations of biodiesel,” Fuel, vol. 262, pp 116553, 2020.
12. R. Şener, “Experimental and numerical analysis of a waste cooking oil biodiesel blend used in a CI engine,” International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences, vol. 33, pp. 299–307, 2021.
13. L. Andrady and M. A. Neal, “Applications and societal benefits of plastics,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 364, pp. 1977–1984, 2009.
14. D. Damodharan, A. P. Sathiyagnanam, B. Rajesh Kumar, and K. C. Ganesh, “Cleaner emissions from a DI diesel engine fueled with waste plastic oil derived from municipal solid waste under the influence of n-pentanol addition, cold EGR, and injection timing,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 25, pp. 13611–13625, 2018.
15. S. H. Chang, “Plastic waste as pyrolysis feedstock for plastic oil production: A review,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 877, pp 162719, 2023.
16. S. Uslu, “An additional value for the disposed wastes: An experimental and RSM optimization study based on the enhancement of waste plastic oil/diesel fuel blend with optimum B₂O₃ nanoparticles for cleaner emissions,” Journal of the Energy Institute, vol. 119, pp 102013, 2025.
17. S. Dey, G. T. N. Veerendra, P. S. S. A. Babu, A. V. P. Manoj, and K. Nagarjuna, “Degradation of Plastics Waste and Its Effects on Biological Ecosystems: A Scientific Analysis and Comprehensive Review,” Biomedical Materials & Devices, vol. 2, pp. 70–112, 2024.
18. N. Nair, T. Nagadurga, V. D. Raju, H. Venu, S. Algburi, S. Kamangar, et al., “Impact of fuel additives on the performance, combustion and emission characteristics of diesel engine charged by waste plastic bio-diesel,” Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, vol. 67, pp 105755, 2025.
19. T. J. Anunobi, “Hazardous effects of plastic wastes on land biodiversity: A review,” The Zoologist, vol. 20, pp. 80–86, 2022.
20. J. Gug, D. Cacciola, and M. J. Sobkowicz, “Processing and properties of a solid energy fuel from municipal solid waste (MSW) and recycled plastics,” Waste Management, vol. 35, pp. 283–292, 2015.
21. R. Zevenhoven, M. Karlsson, M. Hupa, and M. Frankenhaeuser, “Combustion and Gasification Properties of Plastics Particles,” Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, vol. 47, pp. 861–870, 1997.
22. Kalargaris, G. Tian, and S. Gu, “The utilisation of oils produced from plastic waste at different pyrolysis temperatures in a DI diesel engine,” Energy, vol. 131, pp. 179–185, 2017.
23. H. Venkatesan, S. Sivamani, K. Bhutoria, and H. H. Vora, “Assessment of waste plastic oil blends on performance, combustion and emission parameters in direct injection compression ignition engine,” International Journal of Ambient Energy, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 170–178, 2019.
24. S. Kumar, R. Prakash, S. Murugan, and R. K. Singh, “Performance and emission analysis of blends of waste plastic oil obtained by catalytic pyrolysis of waste HDPE with diesel in a CI engine,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 74, pp. 323–331, 2013.
25. F. Ramírez-Verduzco, J. E. Rodríguez-Rodríguez, and A. del R. Jaramillo-Jacob, “Predicting cetane number, kinematic viscosity, density and higher heating value of biodiesel from its fatty acid methyl ester composition,” Fuel, vol. 91, pp. 102–111, 2012.
26. Wedler and J. P. M. Trusler, “Review of density and viscosity data of pure fatty acid methyl ester, ethyl ester and butyl ester,” Fuel, vol. 339, pp 127466, 2023.
27. Tesfa, R. Mishra, F. Gu, and N. Powles, “Prediction models for density and viscosity of biodiesel and their effects on fuel supply system in CI engines,” Renewable Energy, vol. 35, pp. 2752–2760, 2010.
28. R. Şener, S. Uslu, and A. Savaş, “The role of magnetic maghemite (Fe₂O₃) nanoparticles for the improvement of 2nd generation biodiesel/diesel blends: RSM based multi-objective optimization,” Renewable Energy, vol. 249, pp 123211, 2025.
29. S. Simsek, S. Uslu, H. Simsek, and G. Uslu, “Multi-objective-optimization of process parameters of diesel engine fueled with biodiesel/2-ethylhexyl nitrate by using Taguchi method,” Energy, vol. 231, pp 120866, 2021.
30. S. Suresh, A. B. V. Barboza, K. Ashwini, and P. Dinesha, “Optimization of ANN Models Using Metaheuristic Algorithms for Prediction of Tailpipe Emissions in Biodiesel Engine,” Heat Transfer, vol. 54, pp. 1189–1201, 2025.
31. S. Simsek and S. Uslu, “Determination of a diesel engine operating parameters powered with canola, safflower and waste vegetable oil based biodiesel combination using response surface methodology (RSM),” Fuel, vol. 270, pp 117496, 2020.
32. S. Kumar and P. Dinesha, “Optimization of engine parameters in a bio diesel engine run with honge methyl ester using response surface methodology,” Measurement, vol. 125, pp. 224–231, 2018.
33. Dubey, R. S. Prasad, J. K. Singh, and A. Nayyar, “Optimization of diesel engine performance and emissions with biodiesel-diesel blends and EGR using response surface methodology (RSM),” Clean Engineering and Technology, vol. 8, pp 100509, 2022.
34. Canan, “Enrichment of 3rd generation biodiesel/diesel blends with optimum boron oxide for cleaner diesel emissions by multi-objective optimization using RSM,” Environmental Research, vol. 276, pp 121472, 2025.
35. S. Simsek, S. Uslu, H. Simsek, and G. Uslu, “Improving the combustion process by determining the optimum percentage of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) via response surface methodology (RSM) in a spark ignition (SI) engine running on gasoline-LPG blends,” Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 221, pp 106947, 2021.
36. Savaş, S. Uslu, and Ş. Saral, “Enabling a Sustainable Diesel Future: Emission Control and Performance Enhancement with B₂O₃ Nanoparticles via RSM Optimization,” International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology, vol. 9, pp. 174–185, 2025.
37. Savaş, S. Uslu, and R. Şener, “Optimization of performance and emission characteristics of a diesel engine fueled with MgCO₃ nanoparticle doped second generation biodiesel from jojoba by using response surface methodology (RSM),” Fuel, vol. 381, pp 133658, 2025.
38. Canan, “Multi-purpose optimization with response surface methodology of plastic waste cables to clean energy with graphene nanoparticles,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 391, pp 126336, 2025.
39. Romelin, Zahedi, and B. C. Nusantara, “Comparative Analysis of Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Taguchi Method: Optimization Hydraulic Ram Pump Performance,” Operations Research Forum, vol. 5, pp 85, 2024.
40. S. Rajaraman, G. K. Yashwanth, T. Rajan, R. S. Kumaran, and P. Raghu, “Experimental Investigations of Performance and Emission Characteristics of Moringa Oil Methyl Ester and Its Diesel Blends in a Single Cylinder Direct Injection Diesel Engine,” Proceedings of ASME IMECE, vol. 3, pp. 27–34, 2009.
41. Y. V. H. Rao, R. S. Voleti, V. S. Hariharan, P. N. Reddy, and A. V. S. R. Raju, “Performance and Emission Characteristics of Diesel Engine with Methyl Ester Jatropha Oil and its Blends,” Energy & Environment, vol. 20–21, pp. 1343–1355, 2009.
42. Zhao, X. Zhu, R. Zhao, J. Tian, D. Qian, and Q. Lin, “Experimental study on macro spray, combustion and emission characteristics of biodiesel and diethyl carbonate blends,” International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 22, pp. 5455–5470, 2025.
43. Srithar, K. Arun Balasubramanian, V. Pavendan, and B. Ashok Kumar, “Experimental investigations on mixing of two biodiesels blended with diesel as alternative fuel for diesel engines,” Journal of King Saud University – Engineering Sciences, vol. 29, pp. 50–56, 2017.
44. S. P. Venkatesan, R. Rahul, V. Sabbharishi, M. Purusothamand, and S. Ganesan, “Study of emission characteristics of a diesel engine run by fuel blends of diesel, jatropha biodiesel and cetane improver,” Materials Today: Proceedings, 2023.
45. A. Asokan, S. Senthur Prabu, P. K. K. Bade, V. M. Nekkanti, and S. S. Gutta, “Performance, combustion and emission characteristics of juliflora biodiesel fuelled DI diesel engine,” Energy, vol. 173, pp. 883–892, 2019.
46. Velmurugan and A. P. Sathiyagnanam, “Effect of biodiesel fuel properties and formation of NOx emissions: a review,” International Journal of Ambient Energy, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 644–651, 2017.
47. T. Badawy, Z. Bao, and H. Xu, “Impact of spark plug gap on flame kernel propagation and engine performance,” Applied Energy, vol. 191, pp. 311–327, 2017.
48. T. Korakianitis, A. M. Namasivayam, and R. J. Crookes, “Natural-gas fueled spark-ignition (SI) and compression-ignition (CI) engine performance and emissions,” Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, vol. 37, pp. 89–112, 2011.
49. S. E. Hoekman and C. Robbins, “Review of the effects of biodiesel on NOx emissions,” Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 96, pp. 237–249, 2012.
50. J. R. Sodré, A. R. F. L. Ribeiro, and L. R. de Queiroz, “Emission of volatile aldehydes in the exhaust of a diesel power generator fuelled with castor oil biodiesel,” Fuel, vol. 88, pp. 450–454, 2009.
51. Sahoo, L. Das, M. Babu, P. Arora, V. Singh, N. Kumar, et al., “Comparative evaluation of performance and emission characteristics of jatropha, karanja and polanga based biodiesel as fuel in a tractor engine,” Fuel, vol. 88, pp. 1698–1707, 2009.
52. J. B. Heywood, Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 1988.
53. R. Kiplimo, E. Tomita, N. Kawahara, and S. Yokobe, “Effects of spray impingement, injection parameters, and EGR on the combustion and emission characteristics of a PCCI diesel engine,” Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 37, pp. 165–175, 2012.
54. F. Zhu, X. Ge, and H. Xu, “Combustion and particulate emissions of a direct injection spark ignition engine operating on ethanol/gasoline and n-butanol/gasoline blends,” Fuel, vol. 230, pp. 368–377, 2018.