Experimental measurements on the effect of vehicle movement direction on received signal power in V2V communication

Öz

Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) communication has been a popular topic in recent years. V2V communication channel measurements in different environments and scenarios have been performed to reveal the effect of different parameters such as vehicles, buildings, or trees. However, vehicle movement direction is generally neglected when the measurement data are analyzed. In this study, V2V channel measurements were carried out in open roads similar to a highway but with less traffic. The measurement data are divided into two groups: the vehicles approaching each other and moving away from each other. The effect of vehicle movement direction on the received signal power is indicated by comparing the received signal power values of these two groups. The results show that the received signal power differs depending on vehicle movement direction. However, according to our findings, it is not clear which movement direction causes more path loss. The authors suggest that vehicle movement direction should be taken into account in analyzing, modeling, and simulations of V2V communication channel.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• V2V
• vehicle to vehicle communication
• experimental measurement
• channel model
• vehicle movement direction

Kaynakça

1. ITS EU Commission. “Innovating for the transport of the future”. Accessed: 2020-07-15. [Online]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/transport/themes/its en.
2. Paier, J. Karedal, N. Czink, H. Hofstetter, C. Dumard, T. Zemen, F. Tufvesson, A. F. Molisch, and C. F. Mecklenbra¨uker, “Car-to-car radio channel measurements at 5 GHz: Pathloss, power-delay profile, and delay-Doppler spectrum,” Proceedings of 4th IEEE Internatilonal Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems 2007, ISWCS, pp. 224–228, 2007.
3. J. Karedal, N. Czink, A. Paier, F. Tufvesson, and A. F. Molisch, “Path Loss Modeling for Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communications,” Vehicular Technology, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 323–328, 2011.
4. Roivainen, P. Jayasinghe, J. Meinilau, V. Hovinen, and M. Latva-Aho, “Vehicle-to-vehicle radio channel characterization in urban environment at 2.3 GHz and 5.25 GHz,” IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, PIMRC, vol. 2014-June, pp. 63–67, 2014.
5. Kihei, J. A. Copeland, and Y. Chang, “Improved 5.9GHz V2V short range path loss model,” Proceedings - 2015 IEEE 12th International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems, MASS 2015, pp. 244–252, 2015.
6. Y. Ibdah and Y. Ding, “Mobile-to-Mobile Channel Measurements at 1.85 GHz in Suburban Environments,” Ieee Transactions on Communications, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 466–475, 2015.
7. J. Joo, H. J. Jeong, and D. S. Han, “Verification of Fresnel Zone Clearance for Line-of-sight Determination in 5.9 GHz Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communications,” Wireless Personal Communications, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 239–249, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-5685-6
8. L. Cheng, B. E. Henty, D. D. Stancil, F. Bai, and P. Mudalige, “Mobile vehicle-to-vehicle narrow-band channel measurement and characterization of the 5.9 GHz Dedicated Short Range Communication (DSRC) frequency band,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 1501–1516, 2007.

9. T. Abbas, K. Sjo¨berg, J. Karedal, and F. Tufvesson, “A Measurement Based Shadow Fading Model for Vehicle-to-Vehicle Network Simulations,” International Journal of Antennas and Propagation, vol. 2015, 2015.
10. T. S. and others Rappaport, Wireless communications: principles and practice. prentice hall PTR New Jersey, 1996.