Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Revised Math Anxiety Rating Scale (MARS) among Ugandan high schools

Theode Niyirinda; Stefanie Wind; Christoper Ocheni

doi:10.21449/ijate.1738209

Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Revised Math Anxiety Rating Scale (MARS) among Ugandan high schools

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the revised Math Anxiety Rating Scale for Uganda, administered to a convenience sample of 107 high school students across four grade levels. The revised scale adaptation process focused on ensuring semantic, idiomatic, experiential, and conceptual equivalence between the original and adapted items. Using Rasch measurement approaches, including the Partial Credit Model and the Many-Facet Rasch Model, we assessed item fit, reliability, and rating scale functioning. Although initial results showed strong internal consistency, 17 of the 25 items exhibited disordered thresholds. To address this, the original five-point scale was re-coded into three categories, resulting in improved threshold ordering and only a minimal reduction in person reliability. Threshold distances between adjacent categories met recommended guidelines, supporting category precision across groups. Additionally, no differential item functioning was observed across age or grade level, suggesting that the revised scale operates equivalently for diverse student subgroups. These findings provide initial evidence that the revised scale is a reliable and culturally relevant instrument for measuring math anxiety among Ugandan high school students, with implications for educational assessment and intervention.

Keywords

Project Number

N/A

References

Adams, R.J., Wu, M.L., & Wilson, M. (2012). The Rasch rating model and the disordered threshold controversy. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72(4), 547 573. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164411432166
Alexander, L., & Martray, C. (1989). The development of an abbreviated version of the Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 22(3), 143-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.1989.12022923
American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), & National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. AERA. https://www.aera.net/publications/books/standards-for-educational-psychological-testing-2014-edition
Andrich, D.A. (2013). An expanded derivation of the threshold structure of the polytomous Rasch model that dispels any ‘‘threshold disorder controversy.’’ Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(1), 78-124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164412450877
Ashcraft, M.H. (2002). Math anxiety: Personal, educational, and cognitive consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 181-185. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00196
Azizan, N.H., Mahmud, Z., & Rambli, A. (2021). Accuracy and bias of the Rasch rating scale person estimates using maximum likelihood approach: A comparative study of various sample sizes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2084(1), Article 012006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742 6596/2084/1/012006
Baloglu, M., & Kocak, R. (2006). A multivariate investigation of the differences in mathematics anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(7), 1325 1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.10.009
Boaler, J. (2002). Experiencing school mathematics: Traditional and reform approaches to teaching and their impact on student learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410606365

Chou, Y.T., & Wang, W.C. (2010). Checking dimensionality in item response models with principal component analysis on standardized residuals. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(5), 717-731. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164410379322
Eden, C., Heine, A., & Jacobs, A.M. (2013). Mathematics anxiety and its development in the course of formal schooling A review. Psychology, 4(6A2), 27 35. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2013.46A2005
Finell, J., Eklöf, H., Korhonen, & J. Bert Jonsson (2024). Reliability and validity evidence of the Swedish shortened mathematics anxiety rating scale elementary (MARS-E). Discover Education, 3, Article 240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00348-8
Finlayson, M. (2014). Addressing math anxiety in the classroom. Improving Schools, 17(1), 99-115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480214521457
Gamerman, D., Goncalves, F.B., & Soares, T.M. (2018). Differential item functioning. In W.J. van der Linden (Ed.), Handbook of item response theory (Vol. 3, pp. 67-86). CRC Press.
Hambleton, R.K., Patsula, L. (1998). Adapting tests for use in multiple languages and cultures. Social Indicators Research, 45, 153-171. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006941729637
Hembree, R. (1990). The nature, effects, and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.21.1.0033
Henschel, S., & Roick, T. (2017) Relationships of mathematics performance, control and value beliefs with cognitive and affective math anxiety. Learning and Individual Differences, 55, 97 107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.03.009
Hill, F., Mammarella, I.C., Devine, A., Caviola, S., Passolunghi, M.C., & Szűcs, D. (2016). Maths anxiety in primary and secondary school students: Gender differences, developmental changes and anxiety specificity. Learning and Individual Differences, 48, 45 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.02.006
Hopko, D.R., Mahadevan, R., Bare, R.L., & Hunt, M.K. (2003). The Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale (AMAS): Construction, validity, and reliability. Assessment, 10(2), 178 182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191103010002008
Hunt, T.E., Clark-Carter, D., & Sheffield, D. (2011). The development and part validation of a UK Scale For Mathematics Anxiety. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(5), 455 466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282910392892
Kelly, S., Croucher, S.M., Kim, K.Y., Permyakova, T., Turdubaeva, E., Rocker, K.T., Eskiçorapçı, N., Stanalieva, G., Orunbekov, B., & Rimkeeratikul, S. (2022). A general math anxiety measure. Education Sciences, 12(6), Article 370. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12060370
Komboz, B., Strobl, C., & Zeileis, A. (2018). Tree-based global model tests for polytomous Rasch models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 78(1), 128 166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164416664394
Lambert, S.D., Pallant, J.F., Boyes, A.W., King, M.T., Britton, B., & Girgis, A. (2013). A Rasch analysis of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) among cancer survivors. Psychological Assessment, 25, 379-390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0031154
Linacre, J.M. (1989). Many-faceted Rasch measurement [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The University of Chicago. https://www.proquest.com/openview/9947a2b1a43f10331c468abcca2ba3e6/1?cbl=18750&diss=y&pq-origsite=gscholar
Linacre, J.M. (1994). Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 7(4), 328.
Linacre, J.M. (1998). Structure in Rasch residuals: Why principal components analysis (PCA)? Rasch Measurement Transactions, 12(2), 636.
Linacre, J.M. (2002). Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3(1), 85-106. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/John-Linacre/publication/11372384
Linacre, J.M. (2019). FACETS: Computer program for many faceted Rasch measurement (Version 3.82.1). Mesa Press.
Luttenberger, S., Wimmer, S., & Paechter, M. (2018). Spotlight on math anxiety. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 11, 311-322. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S141421
Ma, X., & Klinger, D.A. (2000). Hierarchical linear modelling of student and school effects on academic achievement. Canadian Journal of Education / Revue Canadienne de l’éducation, 25(1), 41-55. https://doi.org/10.2307/1585867
Masters, G.N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47(2), 149 174. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296272
Masters, G.N. (2018). Partial credit model. In W.J. van der Linden (Ed.), Handbook of item response theory (Vol. 1, pp. 109-126). CRC Press.
Ng, L.K. (2012). Mathematics anxiety in secondary school students. In J. Dindyal, L.P. Cheng & S.F. Ng (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 570-577). MERGA. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED573311
Ölmez, İ.B., & Ölmez, S.B. (2019). Validation of the Math Anxiety Scale with the Rasch measurement model. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 31(1), 89-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-018-0244-8
Plake, B.S., & Parker, C.S. (1982). The development and validation of a revised version of the Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42(2), 551-557. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448204200
Pilatti, A., Lozano, O.M., & Cyders, M.A. (2015). Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale: A Rasch rating scale analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Assessment, 27(4), e10–e21. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000124
Raju, N.S. (1988). The area between two item characteristic curves. Psychometrika, 53(4), 495-502. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294403
Rameli, M.R.M., & Kosnin, A.M. (2016). Malaysian school students’ math anxiety: Application of Rasch measurement model. Journal of Effective Teaching, 16(1), 1 11. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mohd-Rustam-Mohd-Rameli/publication/321873451
Ramirez, G., Shaw, S.T., & Maloney, E.A. (2018). Math anxiety: Past research, promising interventions and a new interpretation framework. Educational Psychologist, 53(3), 145 164. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1447384
Reckase, M.D. (1979). Unifactor latent trait models applied to multifactor tests: Results and implications. Journal of Educational Statistics, 4(3), 207 230. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986004003207
Richardson, F.C., & Suinn, R.M. (1972). The Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale: Psychometric data. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19(6), 551-554. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033456
Ricketts, S.N., Engelhard Jr, G., & Chang, M.L. (2017). Development and validation of a scale to measure academic resilience in mathematics. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 33(2), 79-86. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000274
Robitzsch, A., Kiefer, T., & Wu, M. (2020). TAM: Test Analysis Modules (Version 3.5-19) [Computer Software]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=TAM
Satake, E., & Amato, P.P. (1995). Mathematics anxiety and achievement among Japanese elementary school students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55(6), 1000 1007. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164495055006009
Scarpello, G. (2007). Helping students get past math anxiety. Techniques: Connecting Education and Careers (J1), 82(6), 34-35. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=eJ775465
Stoet, G., & Geary, D.C. (2018). The gender-equality paradox in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Psychological Science, 29(4), 581 593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617741719
Strobl, C., Kopf, J., & Zeileis, A. (2015). Rasch trees: A new method for detecting differential item functioning in the Rasch Model. Psychometrika, 80(2), 289-316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-013-9388-3
Suárez-Pellicioni, M., Núñez-Peña, M.I., & Colomé, À. (2016). Math anxiety: A review of its cognitive consequences, psychophysiological correlates, and brain bases. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 16, 3-22. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-015-0370-7
Tutz, G., & Berger, M. (2016). Item-focused trees for the identification of items in differential item functioning. Psychometrika, 81(3), 727-750. https://doi:10.1007/s11336-015-9488-3
Uganda National Examinations Board (2011). National assessment of progress in education: The achievement of secondary school students in Uganda.
Wind, S.A. (2023). Detecting rating scale malfunctioning with the partial credit model and generalized partial credit model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 83(5), 953 983. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316442211162
Wolfe, E.W. (2013). A bootstrap approach to evaluating person and item fit to the Rasch model. Journal of Applied Measurement, 14(1), 1-9. https://europepmc.org/article/med/23442324
Wright, B.D., & Masters, G.N. (1982). Rating scale analysis. MESA press. https://research.acer.edu.au/measurement/2/
Wright, B.D., Mead, R., & Draba, R.E. (1976). Detecting and correcting test item bias with a logistic response model (No. 22; Research Memorandum). Statistical Laboratory, Department of Education, University of Chicago.
Yen, W.M. (1984). Effects of local item dependence on the fit and equating performance of the three-parameter logistic model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8(2), 125 145. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168400800201

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Measurement Theories and Applications in Education and Psychology, Scale Development, Measurement and Evaluation in Education (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Theode Niyirinda ^*
0009-0007-1407-7518
United States

Stefanie Wind
0000-0002-1599-375X
United States

Christoper Ocheni
0000-0001-6007-2362
United States

Early Pub Date

April 8, 2026

Publication Date

-

Submission Date

July 9, 2025

Acceptance Date

February 18, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Number: Advanced Online Publication

DOI

https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1738209

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA83ZL28FA

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Niyirinda, T., Wind, S., & Ocheni, C. (2026). Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Revised Math Anxiety Rating Scale (MARS) among Ugandan high schools. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, Advanced Online Publication, 716-735. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1738209

AMA

1.Niyirinda T, Wind S, Ocheni C. Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Revised Math Anxiety Rating Scale (MARS) among Ugandan high schools. Int. J. Assess. Tools Educ. 2026;(Advanced Online Publication):716-735. doi:10.21449/ijate.1738209

Chicago

Niyirinda, Theode, Stefanie Wind, and Christoper Ocheni. 2026. “Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of the Revised Math Anxiety Rating Scale (MARS) Among Ugandan High Schools”. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, no. Advanced Online Publication: 716-35. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1738209.

EndNote

Niyirinda T, Wind S, Ocheni C (April 1, 2026) Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Revised Math Anxiety Rating Scale (MARS) among Ugandan high schools. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education Advanced Online Publication 716–735.

IEEE

[1]T. Niyirinda, S. Wind, and C. Ocheni, “Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Revised Math Anxiety Rating Scale (MARS) among Ugandan high schools”, Int. J. Assess. Tools Educ., no. Advanced Online Publication, pp. 716–735, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.21449/ijate.1738209.

ISNAD

Niyirinda, Theode - Wind, Stefanie - Ocheni, Christoper. “Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of the Revised Math Anxiety Rating Scale (MARS) Among Ugandan High Schools”. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education. Advanced Online Publication (April 1, 2026): 716-735. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1738209.

JAMA

1.Niyirinda T, Wind S, Ocheni C. Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Revised Math Anxiety Rating Scale (MARS) among Ugandan high schools. Int. J. Assess. Tools Educ. 2026;:716–735.

MLA

Niyirinda, Theode, et al. “Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of the Revised Math Anxiety Rating Scale (MARS) Among Ugandan High Schools”. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, no. Advanced Online Publication, Apr. 2026, pp. 716-35, doi:10.21449/ijate.1738209.

Vancouver

1.Theode Niyirinda, Stefanie Wind, Christoper Ocheni. Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Revised Math Anxiety Rating Scale (MARS) among Ugandan high schools. Int. J. Assess. Tools Educ. 2026 Apr. 1;(Advanced Online Publication):716-35. doi:10.21449/ijate.1738209