FRACTURING THE URBAN: SYMBOLIC VISUAL REPRESENTATIONS OF UNDERLYING SOCIETAL THEMES IN BELFAST

Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2 1 Nisan 2017
  • Ian Montgomery
  • Ruth Brolly

FRACTURING THE URBAN: SYMBOLIC VISUAL REPRESENTATIONS OF UNDERLYING SOCIETAL THEMES IN BELFAST

Abstract

Belfast, Northern Ireland is a city permeated by structural divisions, echoing underlying and deeply rooted societal divisions, which no amount of architectural intervention, even Tabula Rasa, can completely eradicate. In a city where, from the late 1960s, civil unrest prescribed a solution of walls, these once temporary structures are now permanent, having increased in size and number since the signing of the Belfast Agreement of 1998. The duality of the walls ensures that on one side communities are isolated in social housing developments where the British Army historically approved planning measures dictated by security issues. On the other, a culturally neutral postmodern city centre, re-imagined as a global tourist destination, a free and inviting environment of consumption. This city’s built environment is further fractured by major roads initiatives. Without sufficient, organized or effective opposition, such as was seen in Manhattan, Belfast’s motorway planning has ensured destruction and redistribution of architecture, carving the city into ill-divided socioeconomic portions. On the city’s arterial routes cultural identities are bound up in built environments divested with meaning through signs and symbols, where collective memory, hegemonies, group ideologies, history and myth ensure a narrative of continuity despite changes to the landscape. Even with a ‘genius loci’ constantly under threat the socially produced symbolic landscape of the city’s arterial routes remains imbued with meaning through tangible and visible expressions of culture. This paper undertakes an analysis of the built environment and signage of these arterial routes, supported by a photographic archive, to demonstrate how such visual inquiry can prove a reliable barometer of socio-economic and societal undercurrents, mirroring census findings, in these long-established urban places

Kaynakça

  1. Belfast Interface Project. http://www.belfastinterfaceproject.org/. Belfast Metropolitan Area Plan.
  2. http://www.planningni.gov.uk/index/policy/dev_plans/devplans_az/bmap_2015.htm
  3. Calame, J. & Charlesworth, E.R. (2009), Divided cities: Belfast, Beirut, Jerusalem, Mostar, and Nicosia. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  4. Jacobs, J. (1992), The Death And Life Of Great American Cities. Vintage Books Edition edn. New York: Random House, Inc.
  5. Kinneir, J. (1980), Words and buildings: the art and practice of public lettering. London: Architectural Press.
  6. Lefebvre, H. (1991), The Production Of Space. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  7. McEldowney, M. Sterrett K. and Gaffikin, F. Architectural Ambivalence: the Built Environment and Cultural Identity in Belfast, in Neill, W.J.V. & Schedler, H. (eds) (2001), Urban Planning and Cultural Inclusion. Lessons from Belfast and Berlin. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave.
  8. Pawley, M. (1998:152) Terminal Architecture. London: Reaktion.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

-

Yazarlar

Ian Montgomery Bu kişi benim

Ruth Brolly Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi

1 Nisan 2017

Gönderilme Tarihi

-

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2017 Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Montgomery, I., & Brolly, R. (2017). FRACTURING THE URBAN: SYMBOLIC VISUAL REPRESENTATIONS OF UNDERLYING SOCIETAL THEMES IN BELFAST. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies, 2(2), 60-83. https://izlik.org/JA74MJ42MA
AMA
1.Montgomery I, Brolly R. FRACTURING THE URBAN: SYMBOLIC VISUAL REPRESENTATIONS OF UNDERLYING SOCIETAL THEMES IN BELFAST. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies. 2017;2(2):60-83. https://izlik.org/JA74MJ42MA
Chicago
Montgomery, Ian, ve Ruth Brolly. 2017. “FRACTURING THE URBAN: SYMBOLIC VISUAL REPRESENTATIONS OF UNDERLYING SOCIETAL THEMES IN BELFAST”. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies 2 (2): 60-83. https://izlik.org/JA74MJ42MA.
EndNote
Montgomery I, Brolly R (01 Nisan 2017) FRACTURING THE URBAN: SYMBOLIC VISUAL REPRESENTATIONS OF UNDERLYING SOCIETAL THEMES IN BELFAST. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies 2 2 60–83.
IEEE
[1]I. Montgomery ve R. Brolly, “FRACTURING THE URBAN: SYMBOLIC VISUAL REPRESENTATIONS OF UNDERLYING SOCIETAL THEMES IN BELFAST”, International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies, c. 2, sy 2, ss. 60–83, Nis. 2017, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA74MJ42MA
ISNAD
Montgomery, Ian - Brolly, Ruth. “FRACTURING THE URBAN: SYMBOLIC VISUAL REPRESENTATIONS OF UNDERLYING SOCIETAL THEMES IN BELFAST”. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies 2/2 (01 Nisan 2017): 60-83. https://izlik.org/JA74MJ42MA.
JAMA
1.Montgomery I, Brolly R. FRACTURING THE URBAN: SYMBOLIC VISUAL REPRESENTATIONS OF UNDERLYING SOCIETAL THEMES IN BELFAST. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies. 2017;2:60–83.
MLA
Montgomery, Ian, ve Ruth Brolly. “FRACTURING THE URBAN: SYMBOLIC VISUAL REPRESENTATIONS OF UNDERLYING SOCIETAL THEMES IN BELFAST”. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies, c. 2, sy 2, Nisan 2017, ss. 60-83, https://izlik.org/JA74MJ42MA.
Vancouver
1.Ian Montgomery, Ruth Brolly. FRACTURING THE URBAN: SYMBOLIC VISUAL REPRESENTATIONS OF UNDERLYING SOCIETAL THEMES IN BELFAST. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies [Internet]. 01 Nisan 2017;2(2):60-83. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA74MJ42MA