BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

UNDERSTANDING LE CORBUSIER’S UTOPIA: URBANISME AND ITS CURRENT EXTENTIONS

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 3, 5 - 20, 01.02.2018

Öz

One of the most important names in the modern city planning discipline is Le Corbusier, author of the book Urbanisme. Urbanisme is his utopia and one of the most important texts of utopian history. Le Corbusier thinks that a rational design, in accordance with modernism, has universal validity. Paris was always in his mind and he has started to design his utopia from the deficiencies of Paris and the anger he felt toward the city. However, he thought that the city he had designed in this utopia, had to be a model for all cities of the world. The main arguments of Le Corbusier’s utopian design are: there is only one common truth for humanity, and the human mind is able to find it. In 1925, Le Corbusier elaborated on this design of his textually and compiled his proposals, creating a corner stone, a cult study that reflected many influences today. For Le Corbusier, cities should be designed according to an ideal model; this is a city utopia. The homogenous city he planned to go into circulation all around the world and produced with the same standards in every point of the earth, is a giant machine. It is possible to feel this feeling in every corner of the city, even on its plan. Everything that is nonfunctional is excluded from this city and expelled. For the sake of optimization of productivity, all the texture belonging to the past has been discarded. This radical disengagement in the design of the city is not just about its design, it is all about the past at the same time as well. Le Corbusier's suggestion is an uprooting operation. What lies behind externalizing everything that is unique to the human beings such houses, streets and the city from all living areas, is the monopolistic radical rationality and the unconditional glorification of the bureaucratic power? The design of Le Corbusier is, over time - ironically- the projection of political authoritativeness in the scale of urbanism of modernism which initially emerged as a liberating paradigm. Cities, as Le Corbusier suggests, cannot be continuously destroyed totally and rebuilt from scratch each time with the evolving technology. The world has been rapidly urbanizing since the nineteenth century and urbanism is now ascending to metropolitan dimensions. Metropolitanism is driving cities to the domination of pluralism and destruction of homogeneity. This paper discusses Le Corbusier’s utopian city design by analyzing different architectural characteristics of the project and concludes with some arguments of this utopia for today’s cities

Kaynakça

  • Alver, K. 2009. Ütopya: Mekan ve Kentin İdeal Formu, Sosyoloji Dergisi, 3(18).
  • Brenner, N., Jamie, P., & Theodore, N. (2010). After Neoliberalization? Globalizations, 7 (3), 327-345.
  • Corbusier,L.,2017. Bir Mimarlığa Doğru, Yapı Kredi Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Corbusier, L., 2014. Şehircilik, Diamon Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Corbusier, L. (1967). The Radiant City. London: Faber & Faber.
  • Davis, J.C., 1983. Utopia & The Ideal Society, Cambridge University Press.
  • Douglass, 1999. Mega-urban regions and world city formation: Politics of urban public investment. Washington
  • D.C.: The Brookings Institution and Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. Fishman, R., 2016. Yirminci Yüzyılda Kent Ütopyaları, Diamon Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Flyvbjerg, 2012. Why mass media matter, and how to work with them: Phronesis and megaprojects. In
  • Flyvbjerg, B., Landman, T., &Schram, S., Real social science: Applied phronesis (p. 95-121). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Flyvbjerg, 2014. What you should know about megaprojects, and why: An overview. Project Management Journal, 45 (2), 6-19.
  • Flyvbjerg, Bruzelius, & Rothengatter, 2003. Megaprojects and risk: An anatomy of ambition. Cambridge
  • Cambridge University Press. Hardy, 1978. Utopia: A place called New Town. Built Environment, 17 (3/4), 277-286.
  • Harvey, D.,2008. Umut Mekanları, (S.Sarvan, Translated by) Metis Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Harvey, D., 2013. Paris, Modernitenin Başkenti, (B.Kılınçer, Translated by) Metis Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Harvey, D., 1999. Postmodernliğin Durumu, (S.Sarvan, Translated by) Metis Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Havemann, R., 1990. Yarın, Yol Ayırımındaki Sanayi Toplumu Eleştri ve Gerçek Ütopya, Ayrıntı Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Havemann, R., 2005. Ütopya ve Umut, Ayrıntı Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Hedrén & Linnér, 2009. Utopian thought and the politics of sustainable development. Futures, 41 (4), 210–219.
  • Kateb, G., 1975. Utopia and Its Enemies, Collier-MacMillan, London.
  • Köksal, A., 2014. Açık Bir Metin Olarak “Şehircilik”, Sanat Tarih Eleştiri, http://www.e- skop.com/skopbulten/acik-bir-metin-olarak-sehircilik/2277, erişim tarihi: 28.2.2018
  • Kumar, K., 2005. Ütopyacılık, (A.Somel, Translated by), İmge Yayınları, Ankara.
  • Merzi, S., 2017. Çevirmenin Özsözü, L.Corbusier içinde, Bir Mimarlığa Doğru, Yapı Kredi Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Meyerson, M., 1996. Ütopya Gelenekleri ve Kentlerin Planlanması, Cogito ve Kent Kültürü Özel Sayısı, 8, Yapı
  • Kredi Yayınları, İstanbul. Moos, S.V., 2009. Le Corbusier Elements of a Synthesis, Rotterdam:010 Publishers.
  • Morgan, 2015. The dialectic of utopian images of the future within the idea of progress. Futures (66), 106-119.
  • Mumford, L., 1996. Makine Efsanesi, (F.Oruç Translated by), İnsan Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Nicoletti, 1971. The End of Utopia. Perspecta, 13/14, 268-279.
  • Noble, R., 2009.The Utopian Impulse in Contemporary Art. Utopias, Whitechapel Gallery, Cambridge.
  • Sacrey, M.R., Bouchet, T. & Picon,A., 2003. Ütopyalar Sözlüğü, Sel Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Sevinç, A.,2004.Ütopya: Hayali Ahali Projesi, Okuyanus Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Snyder, J.N., 1991. Introduction, G.Vattimo, The End of Modernity, Polity Press, Cambridge.
  • Stevenson, 2006. From vision into action. Futures, 38 (6), 667-672.
  • Tanyeli, U., 2017. Yıkarak Yapmak, Anarşist bir Mimarlık Kuramı İçin Altlık, Metis Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Usta, S., 2015. İlkçağ Ütopyaları, Kaynak Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Wuellner, 2011. Beyond economic and value wars: Mythic images of future cities. Futures (43), 662-672.
  • Yüksel, Ü.D., 2012. Antikçağdan Günümüze Kent Ütopyaları, İdealKent, 5.
Yıl 2018, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 3, 5 - 20, 01.02.2018

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Alver, K. 2009. Ütopya: Mekan ve Kentin İdeal Formu, Sosyoloji Dergisi, 3(18).
  • Brenner, N., Jamie, P., & Theodore, N. (2010). After Neoliberalization? Globalizations, 7 (3), 327-345.
  • Corbusier,L.,2017. Bir Mimarlığa Doğru, Yapı Kredi Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Corbusier, L., 2014. Şehircilik, Diamon Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Corbusier, L. (1967). The Radiant City. London: Faber & Faber.
  • Davis, J.C., 1983. Utopia & The Ideal Society, Cambridge University Press.
  • Douglass, 1999. Mega-urban regions and world city formation: Politics of urban public investment. Washington
  • D.C.: The Brookings Institution and Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. Fishman, R., 2016. Yirminci Yüzyılda Kent Ütopyaları, Diamon Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Flyvbjerg, 2012. Why mass media matter, and how to work with them: Phronesis and megaprojects. In
  • Flyvbjerg, B., Landman, T., &Schram, S., Real social science: Applied phronesis (p. 95-121). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Flyvbjerg, 2014. What you should know about megaprojects, and why: An overview. Project Management Journal, 45 (2), 6-19.
  • Flyvbjerg, Bruzelius, & Rothengatter, 2003. Megaprojects and risk: An anatomy of ambition. Cambridge
  • Cambridge University Press. Hardy, 1978. Utopia: A place called New Town. Built Environment, 17 (3/4), 277-286.
  • Harvey, D.,2008. Umut Mekanları, (S.Sarvan, Translated by) Metis Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Harvey, D., 2013. Paris, Modernitenin Başkenti, (B.Kılınçer, Translated by) Metis Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Harvey, D., 1999. Postmodernliğin Durumu, (S.Sarvan, Translated by) Metis Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Havemann, R., 1990. Yarın, Yol Ayırımındaki Sanayi Toplumu Eleştri ve Gerçek Ütopya, Ayrıntı Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Havemann, R., 2005. Ütopya ve Umut, Ayrıntı Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Hedrén & Linnér, 2009. Utopian thought and the politics of sustainable development. Futures, 41 (4), 210–219.
  • Kateb, G., 1975. Utopia and Its Enemies, Collier-MacMillan, London.
  • Köksal, A., 2014. Açık Bir Metin Olarak “Şehircilik”, Sanat Tarih Eleştiri, http://www.e- skop.com/skopbulten/acik-bir-metin-olarak-sehircilik/2277, erişim tarihi: 28.2.2018
  • Kumar, K., 2005. Ütopyacılık, (A.Somel, Translated by), İmge Yayınları, Ankara.
  • Merzi, S., 2017. Çevirmenin Özsözü, L.Corbusier içinde, Bir Mimarlığa Doğru, Yapı Kredi Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Meyerson, M., 1996. Ütopya Gelenekleri ve Kentlerin Planlanması, Cogito ve Kent Kültürü Özel Sayısı, 8, Yapı
  • Kredi Yayınları, İstanbul. Moos, S.V., 2009. Le Corbusier Elements of a Synthesis, Rotterdam:010 Publishers.
  • Morgan, 2015. The dialectic of utopian images of the future within the idea of progress. Futures (66), 106-119.
  • Mumford, L., 1996. Makine Efsanesi, (F.Oruç Translated by), İnsan Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Nicoletti, 1971. The End of Utopia. Perspecta, 13/14, 268-279.
  • Noble, R., 2009.The Utopian Impulse in Contemporary Art. Utopias, Whitechapel Gallery, Cambridge.
  • Sacrey, M.R., Bouchet, T. & Picon,A., 2003. Ütopyalar Sözlüğü, Sel Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Sevinç, A.,2004.Ütopya: Hayali Ahali Projesi, Okuyanus Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Snyder, J.N., 1991. Introduction, G.Vattimo, The End of Modernity, Polity Press, Cambridge.
  • Stevenson, 2006. From vision into action. Futures, 38 (6), 667-672.
  • Tanyeli, U., 2017. Yıkarak Yapmak, Anarşist bir Mimarlık Kuramı İçin Altlık, Metis Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Usta, S., 2015. İlkçağ Ütopyaları, Kaynak Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Wuellner, 2011. Beyond economic and value wars: Mythic images of future cities. Futures (43), 662-672.
  • Yüksel, Ü.D., 2012. Antikçağdan Günümüze Kent Ütopyaları, İdealKent, 5.
Toplam 36 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Research Article
Yazarlar

Ece Ceylan Baba Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Şubat 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA Baba, E. C. (2018). UNDERSTANDING LE CORBUSIER’S UTOPIA: URBANISME AND ITS CURRENT EXTENTIONS. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies, 3(3), 5-20.
AMA Baba EC. UNDERSTANDING LE CORBUSIER’S UTOPIA: URBANISME AND ITS CURRENT EXTENTIONS. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies. Şubat 2018;3(3):5-20.
Chicago Baba, Ece Ceylan. “UNDERSTANDING LE CORBUSIER’S UTOPIA: URBANISME AND ITS CURRENT EXTENTIONS”. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies 3, sy. 3 (Şubat 2018): 5-20.
EndNote Baba EC (01 Şubat 2018) UNDERSTANDING LE CORBUSIER’S UTOPIA: URBANISME AND ITS CURRENT EXTENTIONS. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies 3 3 5–20.
IEEE E. C. Baba, “UNDERSTANDING LE CORBUSIER’S UTOPIA: URBANISME AND ITS CURRENT EXTENTIONS”, International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies, c. 3, sy. 3, ss. 5–20, 2018.
ISNAD Baba, Ece Ceylan. “UNDERSTANDING LE CORBUSIER’S UTOPIA: URBANISME AND ITS CURRENT EXTENTIONS”. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies 3/3 (Şubat 2018), 5-20.
JAMA Baba EC. UNDERSTANDING LE CORBUSIER’S UTOPIA: URBANISME AND ITS CURRENT EXTENTIONS. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies. 2018;3:5–20.
MLA Baba, Ece Ceylan. “UNDERSTANDING LE CORBUSIER’S UTOPIA: URBANISME AND ITS CURRENT EXTENTIONS”. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies, c. 3, sy. 3, 2018, ss. 5-20.
Vancouver Baba EC. UNDERSTANDING LE CORBUSIER’S UTOPIA: URBANISME AND ITS CURRENT EXTENTIONS. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies. 2018;3(3):5-20.