ERP SYSTEM SELECTION BY AHP METHOD: CASE STUDY FROM TURKEY

Abstract

An Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system is a critical investment that can significantly affect competitiveness of a corporate in the future. There are many national and international ERP vendors in Turkey. This study presents a comprehensive framework for selecting a suitable ERP system by using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). AHP method, directs how to determine the priority of a set of alternatives and the relative importance of attributes in a multiple criteria decision-making problem. The framework can systematically construct the objectives of an ERP selection to support the business goals and strategies of an enterprise. A real-world case from Turkey demonstrates the feasibility of the proposed framework.

Kaynakça

1. Akkermans,H. and Helden, K. (2002), “Vicious and virtuous cycles in ERP implementation: a case study of interrelations between success factors”, European
2. Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 11, No.1, pp.35–46. Badri, MA. and Davis, D. (2001), “A comprehensive 0–1 goal programming model for project selection”, International Journal of Project Management, No. , pp. 243–52.
3. Bingi, P.S., Sharma, M.K. and Godla, J. J. (1999),“Critical issues affecting an
4. ERP implementation”, Information Systems Management, Vol. 16, No.3, pp.7– Chen, K. and Gorla, N. (1998), “Information system project selection using fuzzy logic”, IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics part A: Systems and Humans, No. 28, pp.849–55.
5. Davenport, T.H. (1998),“Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system”
6. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 76, No.4, pp.121– 131. Davenport, T. H. (2000), Mission critical: realizing the promise of enterprise systems, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
7. Grabski, S.V., Stewart, A. and Leech, A. (2007), “Complementary controls and ERP implementation success”, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, No. 8, pp. 17–39.
8. Hicks, D.A. and Stecke, KE.(1995), “The ERP maze: enterprise resource planning and other production and inventory control software”, IIE Solutions, Vol. 27, No.8, pp.12–16.

9. Lai, V.S., Trueblood, R.P. and Wong, B.K. (1999), “Software selection: A case study of the application of the analytical hierarchical process to the selection of a multimedia authoring system”, Information & Management, No. 36, pp. 221–232.
10. Lee, J.W. and Kim, SH. (2001), “An integrated approach for interdependent information system project selection”, International Journal of Project Management, No.19, pp.111–118.
11. Mabert, V.A, Soni, A. and Venkataramanan, V.A. (2000), “Enterprise Resource
12. Planning Survey of Manufacturing Firms”, Production and Inventory Management Journal, Vol.41, No. 20, pp.52-58. Ptak, CA. (2000), ERP tools, techniques, and applications for integrating the supply chain,. St. Lucie Press.
13. Saaty, T.L. (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York.
14. Schniederjans, M.J., and Wilson, R.L.(1991), “Using the analytic hierarchy process and goal programming for information system project selection”,
15. Information & Management, No.20, pp.333–342. Teltumbde, A., (2000), “A framework of evaluating ERP projects”, International
16. Journal of Production Research, No. 38, pp. 4507–4520.
17. Umble, E. J., Haft, R. R. and Umble, M. M. (2003),“Enterprise resource planning:
18. Implementation procedures and critical success factors”, European Journal of Operational Research, No, 146, pp. 241–257. Wei, C.C. and Wang, M.J.J. 2004), “A comprehensive framework for selecting an
19. ERP system”, International Journal of Project Management, No. 22, pp.161–169. Wei., C.C., Chien, C.F. and Wang, M.J.J. (2005), “An AHP-based approach to
20. ERP system selection”, International Journal of Production Economics, No. 96, pp. 47–62. Wilson, F., Desmond, J., and Roberts, H. (1994), “Success and failure of MRPII implementation”, British Journal of Management, No. 5, pp.221–40.