VIRTUAL COMMUNITIES OF PRACTICE AND CONSUMPTION PRACTICES: A CASE OF TURKEY

Abstract

The present study aims to explore if virtual communities (VC) take the form of communities of practice. It is also aimed to explore the role virtual communities of practice (VCoPs) play in consumers’ identity and consumption practices. Qualitative analysis of a VCoP revealed that it has the structural elements of communities of practice. The community identity is based on the quest of emancipation, adventure and being connected to the nature. Although the community is not explicitly centered upon consumption-related interests, members represent themselves socially within the context of consumption.

Keywords

• Virtual Communities of Practice, Consumption, Identity

Kaynakça

1. Ardichvili, A. (2008), “Learning and Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Communities of Practice: Motivators, Barriers, and Enablers”, Advances in Developing Human Resources, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp.541-554.
2. Arnould, E. and L. Price (2000), “Authenticating acts and authoritative performances: questing for self and community”, (eds) S. Ratneshwar, D. G.,
3. Mick & C. Huffman, The Why of Consumption: Contemporary Perspectives on Consumers Motives, Goals, and Desires. London: Routledge, pp.140-163. Bagozzi, R.P. and U.M. Dholakia (2002), “Intentional Social Action in Virtual
4. Communities”, Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 16, No 2, pp.2-21. Ballantine, B.W. and B.A. Martin (2005), “Forming Parasocial Relationships in
5. Online Communities”, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol.32,No1, pp.197-201. Cova, B. (1997), “Community and Consumption: Towards a Definition of the “Linking Value” of Product or Services”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 3, No 3/4, pp.297-316.
6. Cheung, M.Y., C.Luo, C.L.Sia, and H.Chen (2009),“Credibility of Electronic
7. Word-of-Mouth: Informational and Normative Determinants of On-line Consumer Recommendations”, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 13, No 4, pp.9-38. Chiu, C.M., M.H. Hsu, and E.T.G. Wang (2006), “Understanding Knowledge
8. Sharing in Virtual Communities: An Integration of Social Capital and Social Cognitive Theories”, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 42, No 3, pp.1872-1888.

9. Dewberry, D. R. (2008), “Theorizing the E-Tribe on MySpace.com.” (in: T.L. Adams and S.A.Smith ed., Electronic Tribes : The Virtual Worlds of Geeks, Gamers, Shamans, and Scammers) , USA: University of Texas Press, pp.79-95.
10. Dholakia U.M., R.P. Bagozzi, and L.K. Pearo(2004), “A Social Influence Model of Consumer Participation in Network and Small-Group-Based Virtual
11. Communities”,International Journal of Research in Marketing,Vol21,pp.241-263. Donath, J. S. (1998), “Identity and Deception in the Virtual Community” (in: P. Kollock and Smith ed.,Communities in Cyberspace),London:Routledge,pp.27-58.
12. Gammelgaard, J. (2010), “Knowledge Retrieval through Virtual Communities of
13. Practice”, Behaviour & Information Technology, Vol. 29, No 4, pp.349–362. Hagel, J. and A.G.Armstrong (1997), “Net Gain Expanding Markets through
14. Virtual Communities”, The Mckinsey Quarterly, No 1, pp.141-153. Hemetsberger, A. (2005), “Creative Cyborgs: How Consumers Use The Internet
15. For Self-Realization”, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 32, pp. 653-660. Johnson, M. (2001), “A Survey of Current Research on Online Communities of
16. Practice”, Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 4, pp.45-60. Kimble, C. and P. Hildreth (2004), “Communities of Practice: Going One Step
17. Too Far?” Proceedings 9e colloque de l'AIM, Evry, France. Kimble, C., P. Hildreth and P. Wright (2001), “Communities of Practice: Going
18. Virtual”, (in Y.Malhotra ed., Knowledge Management and Business Model Innovation), London:Idea Group Publishing, pp.220-234. Koliba, C. and R. Gajda (2007), “Evaluating the Imperative of Intraorganizational
19. Collaboration: A School Improvement Perspective”, American Journal of Evaluation, Vol. 28, No.1, pp.26-44. Kozinets, R.V. (1999), “E-Tribalized Marketing? The Strategic Implications of
20. Virtual Communities of Consumption”, European Management Journal, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp.252-264. Lam, D., A.Lee, and R.Mizerski (2009), “The Effects of Cultural Values in Word- of-Mouth Communication”, Journal of International Marketing, Vol.17, No.3, pp.55-70.
21. Lincoln Y.S. and E.G. Guba (2000) “Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions and Emerging Confluences”, (in: N. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln ed., Handbook of Qualitative Research), London: Sage Publications, pp.163-188.
22. Lueg, C. (2000), “Where Is the Action in Virtual Communities of Practice?”
23. Workshop Communication and Cooperation in Knowledge Communities. D- CSCW 2000 Conference, Germany.
24. Miller, D. (1995), “Consumption as the Vanguard of History a Polemic by Way of an Introduction”, (in: D.Miller ed., Acknowledging Consumption), London: Routledge, pp.1-52.
25. Moor, A. and H.Weigand (2007), “Formalizing the Evolution of Virtual
26. Communities”, Information Systems, Vol. 32, No 2, pp.223-247. Pan, S.L. and D.E. Leidner (2003), “Bridging Communities of Practice With
27. Information Technology In Pursuit of Global Knowledge Sharing”, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 12, No 1, pp.71-88. Presi, C., P.Michell and A.R. Lock(2006),“Reading Consumers Identity in Virtual
28. Communities of Consumption:Exploring the Influence of Motive and Focus of Attention”,Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research,Vol.7,No1, pp.330-338. Probst, G. and S.Borzillo (2008), “Why Communities of Practice Succeed and Why They Fail”, European Management Journal, Vol. 26, pp.335-347.
29. Ridings, C.M., D.Gefen and B. Arinze (2002), “Some Antecedents and Effects of
30. Trust in Virtual Communities”, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol.11, No.4, pp.271-295. Rothaermel, F.T. and S. Sugiyama(2001),“Virtual Internet Communities and Commercial Success: Individual and Community Level Theory Grounded In The Atypical Case of timezone.com”,Journal of Management,Vol.27,No3,pp.297-312.
31. Schau H.J. (2000), "Consumer Imagination, Identity and Self-Expression",
32. Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 27, pp.50-56. Schau H.J. and A.M.Muniz (2002), "Brand Communities and Personal Identities:
33. Negotiations in Cyberspace",Advances in Consumer Research,Vol.29,pp.344-349. Wamalwa, T. (2007), “Internet Technology and Challenges of Virtual
34. Communities', International Journal of Business Research, Vo1.7,No.4, pp.69-85. Wasko, M.M. and S.Faraj (2005), “Why Should I Share? Examining Social
35. Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice”, MIS Quarterly, Vol.29, No.1, pp.35-57. Wenger, E.C. (1998), Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity,
36. UK: Cambridge University Press. Wenger, E.C. (2000), “Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems”,
37. Organization Articles, Vol. 7, No 2, pp.225-246. Wenger, E.C. and W.M.Snyder (2000), “Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier”, Harvard Business Review, Vol.78, No.1, pp.139-145.
38. Wenger, E.C., R. McDermott and W.M. Snyder (2002), Cultivating Communities of Practice, Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.