NETWORK ANALYSIS: A NEW APPROACH FOR EVALUATION OF INDUSTRIAL OPERATIONAL PLANS (STUDY OF TEXTILE INDUSTRY & CLOTHING OF IRAN)

Abstract

"Network Analysis" is a new approach which its main focus is on the relations among actors, not individual actors and their attributes in order to discover the gaps, overlaps, isolations, pendants and centralities in networks. As a result, this approach could be useful for "evaluation". "Evaluation" is one of the most important stages of Strategic planning and some failure in operational plans is just due to some inappropriate pre and post evaluations. Preparing operational plans as a guideline for governments is another important stage of strategic planning and management. Hence, pre and post evaluations of these plans lead to prevent changes in strategic plans and increase the time and money saving. In Iran, according to industrial plan development and in order to privatization, some industries such as textile confront some strategic problems. In this regard, we prepared an operational plan for textile industry of Iran including important strategies, problems, plans and activities and the organizations responsible to execute each activity by Hoshin Kanry Model. Then, we used Network Analysis to delineate and analyze this strategic management network in which nodes are considered as organizations and relations are viewed as their collaborations in the same activities. UCINET, Netdraw Softwares, and centrality measures were used for analyzing and visualizing the plan. The end results showed that Network Analysis is a useful approach to pre and post evaluation of operational plans and helps planners and managers to discover the strengths and weaknesses of strategic plans

Keywords

• Network Analysis, Operational Plan, Strategic Planning, Textile Industry

Kaynakça

1. Börzel, T. (1997). “What's so special about policy networks? An exploration of the concept and its usefulness in studying European governance”. European
2. Integration online Papers (EIoP) 1(16). Brandes, U. & Erlebach, Th. (2005). “Network analysis- Methodological foundations. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
3. Brandes, U., Kenis, P.& Wagner, D. 2003. Communicating centrality in policy network drawings. IEEE Transaction on Visualization and Computer Graphics, (2): 241-253.
4. Carpenter, D., Esterling, K. & Lazer, D. 2003. The strength of strong ties: a model of contact-making in policy networks with evidence from U.S. health policies.
5. Rationality and Society, 15: 411-440. Daugbjerg, C. 1998. Linking policy networks and environmental policies: Nitrate policy making in Denmark and Sweden 1970-1995. Public Administration, 76(2): 294.
6. Freeman, L.C., Borgatti, S.P. & White, D.R. 1991. Centrality in valued graphs: A measure of betweenness based on network flow. Social Networks, 13: 141-154.
7. Grande, E. & Peschke, A. 1999. Transnational cooperation and policy networks in
8. European science policy-making. Research Policy, 28: 43-61. Hasanagas, N.D., 2004. Power factor typology through organizational and network analysis - Using environmental policy networks as an illustration,

9. Dissertation, University of Göttingen. Kenis, P. & Schneider, V. 1991. Policy Networks and Policy Analysis:
10. Scrutinizing a New Analytical Toolbox. In: Marin, B. & Mayntz, R. (eds.). Policy Networks: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations. Westview Press, 59. Knoke, D., 1990. Political Networks: The Structural Perspective. Cambridge:
11. Cambridge University Press, 1-27. Krebs, V., 2008. Social Network Analysis; a Brief Introduction. Available at: http://www.orgnet.com/index.html
12. Cline, K. D., 2000. Defining the Implementation Problem:Organizational
13. Management versus Cooperation, Colorado State University. Lenschow, A. 1997. Variation in EC environmental policy integration: Agency push within complex institutional structures. Journal of European Public Policy, (1): 109-127.
14. Mueller, R.A.E., Buergert, D.& Seidel-Lass, L. 2007. Supply Chains and Social
15. Network Analysis. Paper presented at the 1st International European Forum on Innovation and System Dynamics in Food Networks, February 15-17, Innsbruck- Igls, Austria. Raab, J. & Kenis, P. 2003. Taking Stock of policy networks: Do they matter? In:
16. Handbook of public policy analysis, pp. 187-200. Richardson, T. 1997. The trans-European transport network: Environmental policy integration in the European Union. European Urban and Regional Studies, (4): 333-346.
17. Schneider, V., 1992. The structure of policy networks: a comparison of the chemicals and telecommunication policy domains in Germany. European Journal of Political Research, 21: 109-129.
18. Sreward, F. & Conway, S. 1998. Situating discourse in environmental innovation networks. Organization, 5(4): 479-502.
19. Stoker, R. P., 1983. Interorganizanonal Conflict and the Implementation Problem.
20. Ph.D. diss. University of Maryland. Zijlstra, G.J., 1979. Networks in public policy: nuclear in the Netherlands. Social Network, 1: 359-389.