CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY: THE INFLUENCE OF THE SILVER BOOK

Abstract

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) encompasses wide range of terms and the concern varies from business to business. It has passed the traditional issue of philanthropy. It goes beyond that. The focus is not limited to people or society only but it covers wide areas like environmental excellence, human rights and other issues that organization must integrate into their core business. In Malaysia, Bursa Malaysia developed the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Framework for Public Limited companies. This was followed by the Silver Book (CSR standards) which the government introduced as part of Transformation Program (ensuring advancing Malaysia’s development) for the Government-Linked Companies (GLCs). The objective is to promote corporate best practices and provides guidelines for companies to incorporate corporate responsibility as an integral part of their corporate strategy and core business. GLCs as corporate sector in the country and the engine of economic growth must lead the way towards achieving domestic growth and investment (Badawi, 2005). What is the Silver Book? How is the focus of the Silver Book? The Silver Book is a set of principles and guidelines describe how GLCs can contribute and becoming responsible citizens and create value for their business and society. This study attempts to examine the acceptance level of the Silver Book among the GLCs, evaluates and understands the role of the Silver Book in influencing the CSR practices in GLCs and analyse the level of implementation of CSR and suggest recommendation for future research.

Keywords

• Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Government-Linked Companies (GLCs), Malaysia, Silver Book,

Kaynakça

1. Badawi, A. (2005), Speech at the launch of the GLC Transformation Program, 29 July, 2005.
2. Barnett, M. L. (2007), “Stakeholder Influence Capacity and The Variability of Financial Returns to
3. Corporate Social Responsibility”. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp.794-816. Belal, A. (2001), “A Study of Corporate Social Disclosures in Bangladesh”. Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 15, No. 5, pp.274-289.
4. Bowen, Howard (1953), Social Responsibilities of the Businessman, New York: Harper & Row.
5. Carroll, A. (1979), “A Three-Dimensional onceptual Model of Corporate Performance”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 4. No. 4, pp.497-505.
6. Carroll, A. (2008), “A history of Corporate Social Responsibility: Concepts and Practices” (in:
7. Crane et al.,The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility), Oxford University Press, pp.19-46. Chapple, W. and Moon, J., “Introduction: CSR Agendas for Asia”, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Vol. 14, pp.183-188. Cochran, P. and Wood, R. (1984), “Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance”,
8. The Academy Management Journal, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp.42-56. Crane, A., McWilliams, A., Matten, D., Moon, J. and Siegel, D. (2008), “The Corporate Social

9. Responsibility Agenda”, (in: Crane, McWilliams, Moon and Siegel., The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility),Oxford University Press, pp.3-14. Friedman, M., (1970), “The Social Responsibility is to Increase profit”, New York Times
10. Magazine. (September 13) pp.122-126. Garriga, E. and Mele, D. (2004), “Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 53, pp.51-71.
11. Haron, H., Yahya, S., Manasseh, S. and Ismail, I. (2006), “Level of Corporate Social Disclosure in
12. Malaysia”, Malaysian Accounting Review, Vol. 5, No. 1., pp.159-184. Jamali, D. and Mirshak, R. (2007), “Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Theory and Practice in a Developing Country Context”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 72, Springer 2006, pp.243
13. Kurucz, E., Colbert, B. and Wheeler, D. (2008), “The Business Case for Corporate Social
14. Responsibility”, (in: Crane et al., The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility), Oxford University Press, pp.83-112
15. Lockett, A., Moon, J. and Visser, W. (2006), “Corporate Social responsibility in Management
16. Research: Focus, Nature, Salience and Sources of Influence”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp.115-136. Mele, D. (2008), “Corporate Social Responsibility Theories”, (in: Crane et al., The Oxford
17. Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility), Oxford University Press, pp.47-82. Mohammad Zain, M., Mohammad, R. and Alwi, M. (2006), “Malaysian Corporate Responsibility
18. Disclosure: Miscommunication Between Providers and Users of information”, Social responsibility Journal, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp.151-158. Nik Ahmad, N. N., Sulaiman, M. and Siswantoro, D., (2003), “Corporate Social Responsibility
19. Disclosure in Malaysia: An Analysis of Annual Reports of KLSE Limited Companies”, IIUM Journal of Economics and Management” Vol. 11, No. 1, pp.1-37. Orlitzky, M., Schidmt, F. and Rynes, S. (2003), ‘corporate Social and Financial performance: A
20. Meta-Analysis”, Organization Studies, Vol. 24, pp.403-441. Shi, Y. J. (2007), “Corporate Social Responsibility for developing Country Enterprise-Lost war in pertainingGlobal Competitiveness? Globalization and the Good Corporate”, (in: Moorthy, M. et al., (2010), Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business), Vol. 2, No. 2, pp.440-460.
21. The Silver Book (2006), Achieving Value Through Social Responsibility, Putrajaya Committee on
22. GLC High Performance (PCG). UN Global Compact (UNGC) (2007), Annual Review-on the Occasion of the 2007 Global
23. Compact Leaders’ Summit, Geneva, http://www.unglobalcompact.org, (Accessed 26.02.2011)
24. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (2001), The Business Case for Sustainable
25. Development: Making A Difference Towards the Johannesburg Summit 2002 and Beyond, http://www.wbcsd.org, (Accessed 20.03.2011)