A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MARKOR AND MKTOR SCALES OF MARKET ORIENTATION ON UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE AMONG UNIVERSITIES OF TECHNOLOGY IN SOUTH AFRICA.

Abstract

In recent years organisational performance has become one of the most important aspects, both in profit and non-profit sectors. Higher Education institutions (HEIs) are not an exception to this notion although they are faced with a myriad of market-oriented challenges that militate against their performance. The purpose of the study is to conduct a comparative content and empirical analysis on market orientation scales in performance of Universities of Technology (UoTs) in South Africa. This study is premised within a postpositivism cross-sectional quantitative research design and adopted a non-probability convenience sampling method out of a total of 1250 questionnaires that were conveniently distributed among the six participating UoTs in South Africa, only 507 were usable for analysis. The content analysis was undertaken through a literature review while the statistical analysis of the collected data included descriptive statistics, correlations, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, structural equation model and multiple regression analysis. In addition, reliability and validity of the scales were performed. The MKTOR scale yielded customer orientation, inter-functional coordination and competitor orientation as predictors while the MARKOR scale identified market intelligence generation, dissemination and responsiveness as predictors of university performance. The results of the study indicate that there are significant similarities between both scales. In addition, these results support theoretical arguments that universities can be successful in terms of their performance by initiating and adopting market-oriented activities. The study also found a significant impact of market orientation on university performance as consistent with previous market orientation studies undertaken in other contexts. The study has succeeded in affirming that market orientation positively and significantly influences university performance. Management in different HEIs need to rethink their policy framework and strategy to become market-oriented and enhance performance of their institutions. Furthermore, recommendations, limitations and future research opportunities are also identified.

Keywords

• Market orientation,MKTOR,MARKOR and university performance.

Kaynakça

1. Asikhi,O(2011).Adjusted Narver and Slater’s market orientation concept and firm performance in Nigerian Companies, Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 11, (7):54-61.
2. Bagozzi and Yi (2012). Specification, evaluation and interpretation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40 (1):8-34.
3. Boso, Nathaniel, John W. Cadogan and Vicky M. Story, (2012). “Entrepreneurial Orientation and Market Orientation as drivers of Product innovation Success: A Study of Exporters from Developing Economy, International Small Business Journal 3(1):57-81.
4. Campo,S., Diaz,M.A & Yague,J.M(2014). Market orientation in midrange service, urban hotels: how to apply the MKTOR instrument, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 43, (2014):76-86.
5. Cano, C.R.,Carrillat, F.A. & , Jaramillo, F(2004),A meta-analysis of the relationship between market orientation and business performance: evidence from five continents, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21,(2):179-200
6. Deshpandé, R & Farley, J.U (1999).Corporate culture and market orientation: Comparing Indian and Japanese firms. Journal of International Marketing, 7 (4):111-127
7. Du Plessis, P.J. & Rousseau, G.G. (2007). Buyer Behaviour: Understanding Consumer Psychology and Marketing. 3rd ed. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
8. Ellis, P.D. (2006), Market orientation and performance: A metaanalysis and cross-national comparisons, Journal of Management Studies, 43(5): 1089-1107.

9. Farrel,M.A & Oczkowowski, E (1997).An analysis of the MKTOR and MARKOR measures of market orientation: an Australian perspective. Marketing Bulletin,8(3):30-40.
10. Felgueira,T.&Rodrigues,R.G.(2012).Entrepreneurialorientation,marke t orientation and performance of teachers and researchers in public higher education institutions. Public Policy and Administration,11, (4) :703-718.
11. Fornell, C. & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1): 39-52
12. Gauzente,C (1999). Comparing Market Orientation Scales: A Content Analysis Marketing Bulletin, 1999, 10, 76-82,
13. Gross, R (2015). Measuring organizational performance: a new approach to triple bottom line reporting and stakeholder engagement, British Journal of Business and Management Research, 2,(1):69-80.
14. Kaur,G Sharma,R.D & Seli,N(2013). A balanced approach towards market orientation Vikalpa 38 (3), 51-66
15. Kohli, A.K. & Jaworski, B.J. (1990). Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1-18
16. Kohli,A.K, Jaworski,B.J., & Kumar,A.(1993). MARKOR: a measure of market orientation, Journal of Marketing Research Vol. XXX (November 1993), 467-77
17. Long,Z., Kara,A & Spillan ,J.E(2016).Market orientation and firm performance: an empirical analysis of Chinese IT enterprises, Sixth Asia-Pacific Conference on Global Business, Economics, Finance and Social Sciences Feb 2016 :1-22.
18. Ma,J. & Todorovic, Z (2011). Making university relevance: MO as a dynamic capability within institutions of higher learning, Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 15(2):1-15.
19. Malhotra,N.K. (2010) Marketing research: an applied orientation.6th edition. Eaglewood-Cliffs:Prentice_Hall.
20. Maringe,F (2004). Vice chancellor’s perceptions of university marketing: a view from university in a developing country. Higher Education Review,36(2):53-6
21. Narver,J & Slater,S (1990). The effect of market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4):20-35).
22. Niculescu, M, Xu,B, Hampton,G.M & Peterson, R.T.(2013). Market orientation and its measurement in Universities. Administrative Issues Journal: Education, Practice and Research, 3(2:1-16.
23. Oczkowski,E & Farrell,M.A.(2002) Are Market Orientation and Learning Orientation Necessary for Superior Organizational Performance? Journal of Market-Focused Management, 5, 197–217
24. Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis using SPSS for Windows Third Edition. Open University Press: McGraw-Hill
25. Rojas-Mendez, J.I & Rod, M (2013) Chilean wine producer market orientation: comparing MKTOR with MARKOR International Journal of Wine Business Research,25(1):27-49.
26. Tomášková, E.I (2009). The Current Methods of Measurement of Market Orientation, European Research Studies, XII (3):135-150.
27. Voon, B.H (2008).SERVMO: a measure for service driven market orientation in higher education, Journal of Marketing for Higher Education,17(2):216-237.
28. Zebal, M.A. (2003). Market orientation: synthesis model of market orientation for a developing country: the case of Bangladesh. PhD Thesis. Melbourne: Victoria University of Technology