BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR SUCCESSFUL SUCCESSION OF GENERATION Y TEACHERS THROUGH SHARED LEADERSHIP

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 152 - 168, 01.12.2016

Öz

Educational systems are experiencing a global leadership crisis. A large number of school principals represent Baby Boomers Generation, that is, individuals born between 1946 and 1964. These principals are increasingly retiring from leadership and principal positions and there are a fewer applicants for the job. Therefore, it is critical that education systems develop the leadership capacity of teachers able to assume formal leadership positions as the current cohort of principals retire. Currently, the teaching population is made up Generation Y (Gen Y) teachers, that is, individuals born approximately between 1981 and 1995. This is the generation that must be groomed and nurtured for future leadership position in schools. Shared leadership can be an effective strategy to develop these aspiring leaders group belonging to Gen Y into leadership position. This theoretical study offers shared leadership strategies that can be considered for development of Gen Y teachers into leadership positions

Kaynakça

  • Albion, P. and Gutke, H.J (2009), Successful succession through shared leadership: preparing a new generation of educational leaders, Australia:
  • University of Queensland Behrstock, E. and Clifford, M (2009), Leading Generation Y teachers: Emerging
  • Strategies for School leaders. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Centre for teacher quality. Bennett, F., Carpenter, V., and Hill, M (2011), Passing the baton: Principal succession in schools. Leading and Managing, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 28-44.
  • Busher, H (2005), Being a middle leader: exploring professional identities. School
  • Leadership & Management: Formerly School Organisation, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 153. Carter, C. and Carter, K (2001), When generations collide. Johnson City, TN: East
  • Tennessee State University, Employment Development Centre. Chatterji, A. K (2009), Generation Y is about to face its first test. The Philadelphia Inquirer. Accessed 20.6.2010]
  • Cleveland, O.H (2006), Generation Y: The Millennials-Ready or not, here they come (NAS Insights). NAS: Recruitment Communications.
  • Conger, J. A. and Pearce, C. L (2003), A landscape of opportunities: Future research in shared leadership. In C. L. Pearce & J. A. Conger (Eds.), Shared
  • Leadership, pp. 285-303. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Coetzee, S.A., Van Niekerk, E.J., Wydeman, J.L. and Mokoena, S.P (2015), An educator’s guide to effective classroom management (2nd Ed). Hatfield, Pretoria:
  • Van Schaik Publishers. Crowther, F, Hann, L. and Andrews, D (2002b), Rethinking the Role of the School Principal: Successful School Improvement in the Post-industrial Era, The Practicing Administrator, Australia.
  • Crumpacker, M. and Crumpacker, J.D (2007), Succession planning and generational stereotypes: should HR consider age-based values and attitudes a relevant factor or a passing fad? Public Personnel Management, Vol.36, No.4, pp. 369.
  • Cruz, C.S (2007), Gen Y: How Boomer Babies are Changing the Workplace. Hawaii Business.
  • Dempster, N., Lovett, S. and Fluckiger, B (2011), Strategies to develop school leadership: A select literature review. Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership.
  • Duignan, P (2008), Building leadership capacity in Catholic school communities:
  • Is ‘distributed leadership’ really the answer? In A. Benjamin & D. Riley (Eds.), Catholic Schools: Hope in Uncertain Times, pp. 234-247. Mulgrave, Vic: John Garratt Publishing. Duignan, P. and Bezzina, M (2006), Building a capacity for shared leadership in schools: Teachers as leaders of educational change. Paper presented at the Educational Leadership Conference. [Accessed 20.6.2010] http://www.uow. edu.au/content/groups/public/@web/@educ/documents/doc/uow037796.pdf
  • Erickson, T. J (2008), Plugged In: The Generation Y Guide to Thriving at Work.
  • Harvard Business Press: Boston, MA. Elmore, R.F (2000), Building a new structure for school leadership. Albert
  • Shanker Institute, Winter, pp. 2-37
  • Feeney, E.J (2009), Taking a look at a school’s leadership capacity: The role and function of high school department chairs. The Clearing House: A Journal of
  • Educational Strategies, Vol. 82, No.50, pp. 212-219
  • Fink, D (2003), The Law of Unintended Consequences: The ‘Real’ Cost of Top- down Reform, Journal of Educational Change, Vol.4, pp.105-128.
  • Fink, D (2010), The succession challenge: Building and sustaining leadership capacity through succession management, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Fink, D. and Brayman, C (2006), School leadership succession and the challenges of change, Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 42, No.1, pp. 62-89.
  • Hargreaves, A. and Fink, D (2006), Sustainable Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Hargreaves, A. and Fink, D (2004), The seven principles of sustainable leadership, Educational Leadership, Vol. 61, No.7, pp. 8-13.
  • Hargreaves, A., Halasz, D. G. and Pont, B (2008), The Finnish approach to system leadership, in B. Pont, D. Nusche, & D. Hopkins. (Eds), Improving School
  • Leadership, Volume 2:Case Studies on Systems Leadership. Paris, France: OECD publications, pp.69-110. Harris, A. and Lambert, L (2003), Building Leadership Capacity for School
  • Improvement, Buckingham: Open University Press. Harris, A (2003), Teacher Leadership: heresy, fantasy or possibility? ESRC
  • Seminar Challenging the Orthodoxy of School Leadership, February, University of Birmingham. Harris, A (2004), Teacher leadership and distributed leadership : an exploration of the literature, Leading and Managing, Vol.10, No.2, pp.1-9.
  • Hira, N.A. 2007. You raised Them, Now Manage Them, Fortune, 28 May, pp. 26
  • Howe, N. and Strauss, W (2000), Millennials rising: The next generations, New York: Vintage Books.
  • Johns, K. (2003). Managing generational diversity in the workforce. Trends &
  • Tidbits. http://www.workindex.com, [Accessed 20.12.2012]
  • Karefalk, A, Maria, P. and Zhu (2007), “How to Motivate Generation Y with
  • Different Cultural Backgrounds: A Cross-Cultural Comparison between China and Sweden”. PhD Dissertation, Kristianstad University. Katzenmeyer, M. and Moller, G (2001), Awakening the sleeping giant, helping teachers develop as leaders. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Koudal, P. and Chaudhuri, A (2007), Managing the talent crisis in global manufacturing: Strategies to attract and engage generation Y. A Deloitte Research
  • Global Manufacturing Study Lambert, L (2003), Leadership Capacity for Lasting School Improvement,
  • Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Lambert, L (2004), Lasting leadership: A study of high leadership capacity schools. Oakland, CA: Lambert Leadership Development.
  • Lovely, S., Buffum, A. and Barth, R. S (2007), Generations at school: Building an age-friendly learning community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • MacNeil, A. and McClanahan, A. (2005), Shared Leadership, http://cnx.org/ content/m12923/latest/, [Accessed 20.6.2010]
  • Martin, C. and Tulgan, B. (2004).Managing the generation mix – part II. Top
  • Echelon, Employers. http://www.topechelon.com, [20.12.2012]
  • McNeil, L. M (2000), Contradictions of school reform. New York: Routledge.
  • Mokoena, S.P (2012), Student Teachers’ Expectations of Teaching as a Career
  • Choice in South Africa, Journal of Social Sciences, Vol.31, No. 2, pp. 117-126. Mokoena, S.P (2012), Recruiting and Retaining Generation Y Teachers:
  • Emerging Strategies for School Administrators. International Journal for Cross- Disciplinary Subjects in Education, Vol.3, No.1, pp.687-691. Monsour, A (2011), Building Leadership-Capacity for Sustained School
  • Improvement, Unpublished Doctoral Theses, University of Leicester. Normore, A. H (2001), Recruitment, socialization, and accountability of school administrators in two school districts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, OISE,
  • University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. Phillips, D. R. and Addicks, L. K (2010), Engaging a Multi-generational
  • Workforce, International Journal of Facility Management, Vo.1, No.1 Phillips, S., Raham, H. and Renihan, P (2003), The role of the school principal:
  • Present status and future challenges in managing effective schools. Toronto: Queens Printer for Ontario. Pont, B., Nusche, D. and Hopkins, D (2008), Improving School Leadership,
  • Volume 2: Case Studies in Systems Leadership. Paris, France: OECD publications. Rebore, R.W. and Walmsley, A.L.E (2010), Recruiting and retaining Generation
  • Y teachers, London: Sage Publications. Rhodes, C. and Brundrett, M (2009), Growing the leadership talent pool: perceptions of heads, middle leaders and classroom teachers about professional development and leadership succession planning within their own schools,
  • Professional Development in Education, Vol.1, No.14, pp. 1-8
  • Richardson, J. (2008). The Plugged-In School, Journal of Staff Development, Vol.3, No.7, pp. 3-7.
  • Ricketts, J. C. and Rudd, R. D (2002), A Comprehensive Leadership Education
  • Model to Train, Teach, and Develop Leadership in Youth, Journal of Career and Technical Education, Vol.19, No.1, pp.7-17. Sergiovanni, T (2001), Leadership: what’s in it for schools? London: Routledge Falmer.
  • Shaffer, J (2008), Gen Y talent: How to attract and retain the young and the restless (White 66 Paper). Redwood Shores, CA: Saba.
  • Slater, L (2008), Pathways to building leadership-capacity, Educational
  • Management Administration & Leadership, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 55-69. Smith, J. (2004). Surviving and thriving in the multigenerational workplace.
  • Journal Record 1,August 26. Spillane J, Halverson, R. and Diamond, J (2001), Investigating school leadership practice: a distributed perspective, Research News and Comment, Unpublished AERA paper, April.
  • Thompson, K (2010), How strategic is the school-based planning for leadership succession? International Studies in Educational Administration, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 98–113.
  • Thorman, R. (2007). Being a Gen-Y Leader http://www.employeeevolution.com/ archives/2007/07/29/what-it-means-to-be-a-gen-y-leader/ [Accessed 20.6.2010].
  • Wills, G (2015), Informing principal policy reforms in South Africa through data- based evidence, South African Journal of Childhood Education Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 122
  • Wilson, M. and Gerber, L. E (2008), How Generational Theory Can Improve
  • Teaching: Strategies for Working with the Millennials, Currents in Teaching and Learning, Vol. 1, No.1, pp. 29-44. Wong, H.K and Wong, R.T (2007), Teachers: The next generation. Alexandria,
  • VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Yuva, J (2007), Corporations should know Y. Inside Supply Management, pp. 20
  • Zepeda, S.J., Bengtson, E. and Parylo, O (2011), Examining the planning and management of principal succession, Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. , No. 2, pp. 36-158.
Yıl 2016, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 152 - 168, 01.12.2016

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Albion, P. and Gutke, H.J (2009), Successful succession through shared leadership: preparing a new generation of educational leaders, Australia:
  • University of Queensland Behrstock, E. and Clifford, M (2009), Leading Generation Y teachers: Emerging
  • Strategies for School leaders. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Centre for teacher quality. Bennett, F., Carpenter, V., and Hill, M (2011), Passing the baton: Principal succession in schools. Leading and Managing, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 28-44.
  • Busher, H (2005), Being a middle leader: exploring professional identities. School
  • Leadership & Management: Formerly School Organisation, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 153. Carter, C. and Carter, K (2001), When generations collide. Johnson City, TN: East
  • Tennessee State University, Employment Development Centre. Chatterji, A. K (2009), Generation Y is about to face its first test. The Philadelphia Inquirer. Accessed 20.6.2010]
  • Cleveland, O.H (2006), Generation Y: The Millennials-Ready or not, here they come (NAS Insights). NAS: Recruitment Communications.
  • Conger, J. A. and Pearce, C. L (2003), A landscape of opportunities: Future research in shared leadership. In C. L. Pearce & J. A. Conger (Eds.), Shared
  • Leadership, pp. 285-303. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Coetzee, S.A., Van Niekerk, E.J., Wydeman, J.L. and Mokoena, S.P (2015), An educator’s guide to effective classroom management (2nd Ed). Hatfield, Pretoria:
  • Van Schaik Publishers. Crowther, F, Hann, L. and Andrews, D (2002b), Rethinking the Role of the School Principal: Successful School Improvement in the Post-industrial Era, The Practicing Administrator, Australia.
  • Crumpacker, M. and Crumpacker, J.D (2007), Succession planning and generational stereotypes: should HR consider age-based values and attitudes a relevant factor or a passing fad? Public Personnel Management, Vol.36, No.4, pp. 369.
  • Cruz, C.S (2007), Gen Y: How Boomer Babies are Changing the Workplace. Hawaii Business.
  • Dempster, N., Lovett, S. and Fluckiger, B (2011), Strategies to develop school leadership: A select literature review. Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership.
  • Duignan, P (2008), Building leadership capacity in Catholic school communities:
  • Is ‘distributed leadership’ really the answer? In A. Benjamin & D. Riley (Eds.), Catholic Schools: Hope in Uncertain Times, pp. 234-247. Mulgrave, Vic: John Garratt Publishing. Duignan, P. and Bezzina, M (2006), Building a capacity for shared leadership in schools: Teachers as leaders of educational change. Paper presented at the Educational Leadership Conference. [Accessed 20.6.2010] http://www.uow. edu.au/content/groups/public/@web/@educ/documents/doc/uow037796.pdf
  • Erickson, T. J (2008), Plugged In: The Generation Y Guide to Thriving at Work.
  • Harvard Business Press: Boston, MA. Elmore, R.F (2000), Building a new structure for school leadership. Albert
  • Shanker Institute, Winter, pp. 2-37
  • Feeney, E.J (2009), Taking a look at a school’s leadership capacity: The role and function of high school department chairs. The Clearing House: A Journal of
  • Educational Strategies, Vol. 82, No.50, pp. 212-219
  • Fink, D (2003), The Law of Unintended Consequences: The ‘Real’ Cost of Top- down Reform, Journal of Educational Change, Vol.4, pp.105-128.
  • Fink, D (2010), The succession challenge: Building and sustaining leadership capacity through succession management, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Fink, D. and Brayman, C (2006), School leadership succession and the challenges of change, Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 42, No.1, pp. 62-89.
  • Hargreaves, A. and Fink, D (2006), Sustainable Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Hargreaves, A. and Fink, D (2004), The seven principles of sustainable leadership, Educational Leadership, Vol. 61, No.7, pp. 8-13.
  • Hargreaves, A., Halasz, D. G. and Pont, B (2008), The Finnish approach to system leadership, in B. Pont, D. Nusche, & D. Hopkins. (Eds), Improving School
  • Leadership, Volume 2:Case Studies on Systems Leadership. Paris, France: OECD publications, pp.69-110. Harris, A. and Lambert, L (2003), Building Leadership Capacity for School
  • Improvement, Buckingham: Open University Press. Harris, A (2003), Teacher Leadership: heresy, fantasy or possibility? ESRC
  • Seminar Challenging the Orthodoxy of School Leadership, February, University of Birmingham. Harris, A (2004), Teacher leadership and distributed leadership : an exploration of the literature, Leading and Managing, Vol.10, No.2, pp.1-9.
  • Hira, N.A. 2007. You raised Them, Now Manage Them, Fortune, 28 May, pp. 26
  • Howe, N. and Strauss, W (2000), Millennials rising: The next generations, New York: Vintage Books.
  • Johns, K. (2003). Managing generational diversity in the workforce. Trends &
  • Tidbits. http://www.workindex.com, [Accessed 20.12.2012]
  • Karefalk, A, Maria, P. and Zhu (2007), “How to Motivate Generation Y with
  • Different Cultural Backgrounds: A Cross-Cultural Comparison between China and Sweden”. PhD Dissertation, Kristianstad University. Katzenmeyer, M. and Moller, G (2001), Awakening the sleeping giant, helping teachers develop as leaders. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Koudal, P. and Chaudhuri, A (2007), Managing the talent crisis in global manufacturing: Strategies to attract and engage generation Y. A Deloitte Research
  • Global Manufacturing Study Lambert, L (2003), Leadership Capacity for Lasting School Improvement,
  • Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Lambert, L (2004), Lasting leadership: A study of high leadership capacity schools. Oakland, CA: Lambert Leadership Development.
  • Lovely, S., Buffum, A. and Barth, R. S (2007), Generations at school: Building an age-friendly learning community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • MacNeil, A. and McClanahan, A. (2005), Shared Leadership, http://cnx.org/ content/m12923/latest/, [Accessed 20.6.2010]
  • Martin, C. and Tulgan, B. (2004).Managing the generation mix – part II. Top
  • Echelon, Employers. http://www.topechelon.com, [20.12.2012]
  • McNeil, L. M (2000), Contradictions of school reform. New York: Routledge.
  • Mokoena, S.P (2012), Student Teachers’ Expectations of Teaching as a Career
  • Choice in South Africa, Journal of Social Sciences, Vol.31, No. 2, pp. 117-126. Mokoena, S.P (2012), Recruiting and Retaining Generation Y Teachers:
  • Emerging Strategies for School Administrators. International Journal for Cross- Disciplinary Subjects in Education, Vol.3, No.1, pp.687-691. Monsour, A (2011), Building Leadership-Capacity for Sustained School
  • Improvement, Unpublished Doctoral Theses, University of Leicester. Normore, A. H (2001), Recruitment, socialization, and accountability of school administrators in two school districts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, OISE,
  • University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. Phillips, D. R. and Addicks, L. K (2010), Engaging a Multi-generational
  • Workforce, International Journal of Facility Management, Vo.1, No.1 Phillips, S., Raham, H. and Renihan, P (2003), The role of the school principal:
  • Present status and future challenges in managing effective schools. Toronto: Queens Printer for Ontario. Pont, B., Nusche, D. and Hopkins, D (2008), Improving School Leadership,
  • Volume 2: Case Studies in Systems Leadership. Paris, France: OECD publications. Rebore, R.W. and Walmsley, A.L.E (2010), Recruiting and retaining Generation
  • Y teachers, London: Sage Publications. Rhodes, C. and Brundrett, M (2009), Growing the leadership talent pool: perceptions of heads, middle leaders and classroom teachers about professional development and leadership succession planning within their own schools,
  • Professional Development in Education, Vol.1, No.14, pp. 1-8
  • Richardson, J. (2008). The Plugged-In School, Journal of Staff Development, Vol.3, No.7, pp. 3-7.
  • Ricketts, J. C. and Rudd, R. D (2002), A Comprehensive Leadership Education
  • Model to Train, Teach, and Develop Leadership in Youth, Journal of Career and Technical Education, Vol.19, No.1, pp.7-17. Sergiovanni, T (2001), Leadership: what’s in it for schools? London: Routledge Falmer.
  • Shaffer, J (2008), Gen Y talent: How to attract and retain the young and the restless (White 66 Paper). Redwood Shores, CA: Saba.
  • Slater, L (2008), Pathways to building leadership-capacity, Educational
  • Management Administration & Leadership, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 55-69. Smith, J. (2004). Surviving and thriving in the multigenerational workplace.
  • Journal Record 1,August 26. Spillane J, Halverson, R. and Diamond, J (2001), Investigating school leadership practice: a distributed perspective, Research News and Comment, Unpublished AERA paper, April.
  • Thompson, K (2010), How strategic is the school-based planning for leadership succession? International Studies in Educational Administration, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 98–113.
  • Thorman, R. (2007). Being a Gen-Y Leader http://www.employeeevolution.com/ archives/2007/07/29/what-it-means-to-be-a-gen-y-leader/ [Accessed 20.6.2010].
  • Wills, G (2015), Informing principal policy reforms in South Africa through data- based evidence, South African Journal of Childhood Education Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 122
  • Wilson, M. and Gerber, L. E (2008), How Generational Theory Can Improve
  • Teaching: Strategies for Working with the Millennials, Currents in Teaching and Learning, Vol. 1, No.1, pp. 29-44. Wong, H.K and Wong, R.T (2007), Teachers: The next generation. Alexandria,
  • VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Yuva, J (2007), Corporations should know Y. Inside Supply Management, pp. 20
  • Zepeda, S.J., Bengtson, E. and Parylo, O (2011), Examining the planning and management of principal succession, Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. , No. 2, pp. 36-158.
Toplam 67 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Diğer ID JA84EU29AR
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

S. Mokoena Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Aralık 2016
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2016 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Mokoena, S. (2016). A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR SUCCESSFUL SUCCESSION OF GENERATION Y TEACHERS THROUGH SHARED LEADERSHIP. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 8(2), 152-168.
AMA Mokoena S. A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR SUCCESSFUL SUCCESSION OF GENERATION Y TEACHERS THROUGH SHARED LEADERSHIP. IJBMS. Aralık 2016;8(2):152-168.
Chicago Mokoena, S. “A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR SUCCESSFUL SUCCESSION OF GENERATION Y TEACHERS THROUGH SHARED LEADERSHIP”. International Journal of Business and Management Studies 8, sy. 2 (Aralık 2016): 152-68.
EndNote Mokoena S (01 Aralık 2016) A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR SUCCESSFUL SUCCESSION OF GENERATION Y TEACHERS THROUGH SHARED LEADERSHIP. International Journal of Business and Management Studies 8 2 152–168.
IEEE S. Mokoena, “A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR SUCCESSFUL SUCCESSION OF GENERATION Y TEACHERS THROUGH SHARED LEADERSHIP”, IJBMS, c. 8, sy. 2, ss. 152–168, 2016.
ISNAD Mokoena, S. “A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR SUCCESSFUL SUCCESSION OF GENERATION Y TEACHERS THROUGH SHARED LEADERSHIP”. International Journal of Business and Management Studies 8/2 (Aralık 2016), 152-168.
JAMA Mokoena S. A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR SUCCESSFUL SUCCESSION OF GENERATION Y TEACHERS THROUGH SHARED LEADERSHIP. IJBMS. 2016;8:152–168.
MLA Mokoena, S. “A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR SUCCESSFUL SUCCESSION OF GENERATION Y TEACHERS THROUGH SHARED LEADERSHIP”. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, c. 8, sy. 2, 2016, ss. 152-68.
Vancouver Mokoena S. A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR SUCCESSFUL SUCCESSION OF GENERATION Y TEACHERS THROUGH SHARED LEADERSHIP. IJBMS. 2016;8(2):152-68.