INHERENT CHAOS IN THE ORGANIZATIONAL ORDER: AN EPISTEMOLOGICAL APPROACH

Yıl 2011, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 391 - 405, 01.06.2011

Ulaş Çakar Ozan Nadir Alakavuklar

Öz

Traditionally management and organization studies have an assumption of control
with a linear understanding since the beginning of “scientific management”.
Either academic or popular publications create an illusion of control over
organizations, managerial procedures or people with the representations of
“management”. As a challenge to traditional view, chaos theory in management
and organization studies suggests a new perspective. Keeping in mind the
influence of nonlinear approaches, this study aims to confront epistemologically
the neglect of the nature of chaos and order dialectics for further explorations of
management and organization theory.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Management and Organization Studies, Epistemology, Chaos Theory

Kaynakça

• Abrahamson, Eric (1996), “Management fashion”, Academy of Management Review, Vol.21, No.1, pp. 254-285.
• Adler, Paul, Linda C. Forbes and Hugh Willmott (2007), “Critical Management
• Studies”, (in James P. Walsh and Arthur P. Brief Eds., Academy of Management Annals 1), New York: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 119-180. Alvesson, Mats and Hugh Willmott (1992), Critical Management Studies. London: Sage.
• Baofu, Peter (2007), The Future of Complexity. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
• Barnard, Chester I. (1938), The Functions of the Executive, Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Bruce, Kyle and Chris Nyland (2011), “Elton Mayo and the deification of human relations”, Organization Studies, Vol.32, No.3, pp. 383-405.
• Burrell, Gibson (1999), “Normal science, paradigms, metaphors, discourses and genealogies of analysis”, (in Stewart R. Clegg and Cynthia Hardy Eds., Studying Organization: Theory and Method) London: Sage, pp. 388–404
• Cooper, Robert and Gibson Burrell (1988), “Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis: An introduction”, Organization Studies Vol.9, No. 1, pp. –112.
• Copley, Frank B. (1923), Frederick W. Taylor: Father of Scientific Management, vols. New York: Harper.
• Czarniawska, Barbara (2003), “Social constructionism in organization studies”,
• (in Robert Westwood and Stewart Clegg Eds. Debating Organization) Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 128-139. Daft, Richard L. and Arie Y. Lewin (1990), “Can organization studies begin to break out of the normal science straitjacket: An editorial essay”, Organization Science, Vol. 1, No.1. pp.1-9.
• Deal, Terence E. and Allan A. Kennedy (1982), Corporate Cultures: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life, Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.
• DiMaggio, Paul J. and Walter W. Powell (1983), “The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields”,
• American Sociological Review, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 147-160. Farazmand, Ali (2003), “Chaos and transformation theories: A theoretical analysis with implications for organization theory and public management”, Public
• Organization Review: A Global Journal, Vol. 3, pp. 339-372. Fiedler, Fred E. (1967), A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness, NY: McGraw- Hill.
• Follett, Mary P. (1918), The New State: Group Organisation: The Solution for
• Popular Government, NY: Longmans Green. Follett, Mary P. (1924), Creative Experience, NY: Longmans Green.
• Frijda, Nico H. (1988), “The laws of emotion”, American Psychologist, Vol.43, No.5, pp. 349-358.
• George, Claude (1972), The History of Management Thought. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• Hannan, Micheal and John Freeman (1977), “The population ecology of organizations, “American Journal of Sociology, Vol.82, No.5, pp. 929-964.
• Hannan, Micheal and John Freeman (1989), Organizational Ecology, Cambridge,
• MA: Harvard University Press. Hassard, John (1999), “Postmodernism, philosophy and management: concepts and controversies”, International Journal of Management Reviews,Vol.1, No. 2, pp. 171-195.
• Hassard, John and Martin Parker (1993), Postmodernism and Organizations, London: Sage.
• Hillier, Fred S., Mark S. Hillier, Karl Schmedders and Molly Stephens (2008),
• Introduction to Management Science, Singapore: McGraw-Hill. Irvin, Lisa (2002), “Ethics in organizations: A chaos perspective”, Journal of
• Organizational Change and Development, Vol.15, No. 4, pp. 359-381. Johnson, Jonathan L. and Brian B. Burton (1994), “Chaos and complexity theory for management”, Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol.3, No.4, pp. 320-328.
• Khurana, Rakesh (2007), From Higher Ends to Higher Hands, Princeton, NJ:
• Princeton University Press. Kuhn, Thomas. S. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago:
• University of Chicago Press. Levy, David (1994), “Chaos theory and strategy: theory, application and managerial implications”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 15, pp. 167-178.
• Locke, Robert R. (1996), The Collapse of the American Management Mystique,
• Oxford: Oxford University Press. McKelvey, Bill (1999), “Complexity theory in organization science: Seizing the promise or becoming a fad?”, Emergence, Vol.1, No.1, pp.5-32.
• Mendellhall, Mark .E., James H. Macomber and Marc Cutright (2000), “Mary
• Parker Follett: prophet of chaos and complexity”, Journal of Management History, Vol. 6, No.4, pp. 191-204. Meyer, John W. and Brian Rowan (1977), “Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol.83, No.2, pp. 340–363.
• Mingers, (2006), “A critique of statistical modelling in management science from a critical realist perspective: Its role within multimethodology”, The Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 57, No.2, pp. 202-219.
• Morgan, Gareth (2006), Images of Organization, London: Sage.
• Perrow, Charles (1967), “A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations”, Ameican Sociology Review,Vol. 32, No.2, pp. 194-208.
• Perrow, Charles (1986). Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay, Glenview, IL: Scott,Foresman.
• Pfeffer, Jeffrey and Christina T. Fong. (2002), “The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye”, Academy of Management Learning and Education (September), pp. 78–95.
• Priesmeyer, Richard H. (1992), Organizations and Chaos. Westport: Quorum Books.
• Rahim, M. Afzalur (1983), “A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict”, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 26, No. 2., pp. 368-376.
• Schwartz, John (2011) The limits of safeguards and human foresight, The New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/13/weekinreview/13limits.html?_r=1 retrieved on 30.03.2011
• Scott, Richard W. (2004), “Reflections on a half-century of organizational sociology”, Annual Review of Sociology,Vol.30, pp. 1–21.
• Shenhav, Yehouda (2003), “The historical and epistemological foundations of organization theory: Fusing Sociological theory with engineering discourse”, (in Haridimos Tsoukas and Christian Knudsen Eds., The Oxford Handbook of Organization Theory) Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 183-209.
• Shrivastava, Paul (1994), “Castrated environment: Greening organization studies”, Organization Studies, Vol. 15, No.5, pp. 705-726.
• Smircich, Linda and Marta B. Calas (1995), “Introduction”, (in Linda M. Smircich and Marta B. Calas Eds., Critical perspectives on organization and management theory)Aldershot: Dartmouth, pp. xii-xxix
• Smith, Peter A. C. (2003), “Implications of complexity and chaos theories for organizations that learn”, The Learning Organization, Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 321
• Stacey, Ralph D. (1992), Managing the Unknowable, San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
• Starbuck, William H (2003), “The origins of organization theory”, (in Haridimos Tsoukas and Christian Knudsen Eds., The Oxford Handbook of Organization Theory) Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 143-182.
• Suzuki, D.T. (1997), Zen Budizm, İstanbul: Yol Yayınları.
• Taylor,Frederick (1911), The Principles of Scientific Management, NY: Harper.
• Tetzner, Reiner (2004), Cermen Tanrı ve Kahramanlarının Efsaneleri, İzmir: İlya Yayınevi.
• Thiétart,R.A and B. Forgues (1995), “Chaos theory and organization”,
• Organization Science, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 19-31
• Townley, Barbara (1993), “Foucault, power/knowledge, and its relevance for human resource management”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 18, No.3, pp. 518-545.
• Weick, Karl (1969), The Social Psychology of Organizing, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
• Wilding, Richard D. (1998), “Chaos theory: Implications for Supply Chain
• Management”, International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 9, No.1, pp. 56. Williamson, Oliver E. (1975) Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust
• Implications. New York: Free Press. Wren, Daniel A. (2004), The History of Management Thought, NY: John Wiley & Sons.