Studying the effects of deficit irrigation as an on-farm strategy on carrot yield in arid environment

Öz

The deficit irrigation (DI) as an on-farm water management strategy was tested for 3-years to determine the water requirements and productivity, soil salinity and yield for carrot irrigated with saline water (3.6 dS/m) under actual farming conditions in southern Tunisia. The irrigation regimes were full (I100) and deficit (I80 and I60) irrigated with levels of 100, 80 and 60% of ETc when the readily available water, 35% of total available water (TAW), in the I100 treatment was depleted, and traditional farmer practice (Farmer). Regulated DI regime where 40% reduction is applied only during ripening stage (I60-ripening) was also used. Higher soil salinity is observed at harvest under I60 and Farmer treatments compared to I100. Carrot yield was highest over 3 years for the I100 scheduling technique, (29.5, 28.7 and 26.8 t/ha) although no significant differences were observed with the I60-ripening strategy. However, the I80 and I60 treatments caused significant reductions in carrot yields through a reduction in roots number and weight in comparison with I100. The farmer’s method not only caused significant reductions in yield but also resulted in using 43 to 57 % more water and increased soil salinity. For all treatments, carrot yields were higher in first than the two following years. Water productivity (WP) values reflected this difference and varied between absolute extremes of 3.3 and 9.7 kg/m³. WP was the greatest in the I60 treatment and the least in the Farmer's strategy. I100 irrigation strategy provides significant advantage on yield and WP compared to farmer’s method in carrot production. Therefore, for water-saving purposes, the I100 irrigation scheduling is recommended to optimize the use of saline water in carrot production and to control soil salinity. Nonetheless, under water scarcity, irrigation of carrot could be scheduled using I60-ripening and I80 deficit strategies, with some yield reductions (4-15%).

Anahtar Kelimeler

• salinity,deficit irrigation,carrot,yield

Kaynakça

1. Allen, R.G., Perreira, L.S., Raes, D. and Smith, M. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Irrig. and Drain. Paper N°56, FAO, Italy, pp: 300.
2. Bernstein L., Francois L.E. and Clark R.A. 1974. Interactive effects of salinity and fertility on yields of grains and vegetables. Agron. J., 66: 412-421.
3. Doorenbos, J. and Pruitt, W.O. 1977. Crop water requirements. Irrig. and Drain. Paper N°24, pp: 144.
4. Geerts S., Raes, D., Garcia, M., Condori, O., Mamani, J., Miranda, R., Cusicanqui, J., Taboada, C. and Vacher, J. (2008b). Could deficit irrigation be a sustainable practice for quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) in the Southern Bolivian Altiplano? Agric. Water Manage., 95: 909-917.
5. Hartmann, H.D., Werum, H., Bruckuer, U. and Zengerle, K.H. 1986. Effect of irrigation on carrot yield. Gemuse, 22: 62-65.
6. Hsiao T., Steduto, P. and Fereres, E. 2007. A systematic and quantitative approach to improve water use efficiency in agriculture. Irrig. Sci., 25: 209-231.
7. Imtiyaz M., Mgadla, N.P., Manase, S.K., Chendo, K. and Mothobi, E.O. 2000. yield and economic return of vegtable crops under variable irrigation. Irrig. Sci. J., 19: 87-93.
8. Jalota S.K., Sood, A., Chahal, G.B.S. and Choudhury, B.U. 2006. Crop water productivity of cotton-wheat system as influenced by deficit irrigation, soil texture and precipitation. Agric. Water Manage., 84: 137-146.

9. Kaman H., Kirda, C., Cetin, M. and Topcu, S. 2006. Salt accumulation in the root zones of tomato and cotton irrigated with partial root-drying technique. Irrig. Drain., 55: 533-544.
10. Maas, E.V. 1990. Crop salt tolerance. Ed: Tanji, K.K., Agricultural salinity assessment and management. ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice No. 71. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, pp: 262-304. Malash, N., Flowers, T.J. and Ragab, R. 2005. Effect of irrigation systems and water management practices using saline and non-saline water on tomato production. Agric. Water Manage., 78: 25-38.
11. Nagaz, K., Masmoudi, M.M. and Ben Mechlia, N. 2007. Evaluation of on-farm irrigation scheduling: case study of drip irrigated potatoes in Southern Tunisia. Agricultural Journal, 2(3): 358-364.
12. Nagaz K., Masmoudi, M.M., Ben Mechlia, N. 2007. Soil salinity and yield of drip-irrigated potato under different irrigation regimes with saline water in arid conditions of Southern Tunisia. Journal of Agronomy, 6(2): 324-330.
13. Paradiso, R., De Pascale, S. and Barbieri, G. 2002. Effects of water regime and nitrogen supply on yield and mineral composition of carrot. Itlus Hortus, 8(4): 8-13.
14. Raes, D., Smith, M., De Nys, E., Holvoet, K. and Makarau, A. 2002. Charts with indicative irrigation intervals for various weather conditions. Proceedings of workshop organized by FAO-ICID on: Irrigation Advisory Services and Participatory Extension in Irrigation Management. July 23-24, Montreal, Canada, pp: 65-72.
15. Ragab, R. 1996. Constraints and applicability of irrigation scheduling under limited water resources, variable rainfall and saline conditions. In: Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (ed.), Irrigation Scheduling: from Theory to Practice. Rome, Italy, pp: 149-165.
16. Schoups, G., Hopmans, J.W., Young, C.A., Vrugt, J.A., Wallender, W.W., Tanji, K.K. and Panday, S. 2005. Sustainability of irrigated agriculture in the San Joaquin Valley, California. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 102: 15352-15356.
17. Shannon, M.C. and Grieve, C.M. 1999. Tolerance of vegetable crops to salinity. Sci. Hort., 78: 5-38. Smith, M. 1985. Irrigation scheduling and water distribution. In: Les besoins en eau des cultures. Actes de Conférence Internationale, INRA, Paris, France, 11-14 Septembre 1984, pp: 497-514.
18. Zhang, Y., Kendy, E., Qiang, Y., Changming, L., Yanjun, S. and Hongyong, S. 2004. Effect of soil water deficit on evapotranspiration, crop yield, and water use efficiency in North China Plain. Agric. Water Manage., 64: 107-122.