Araştırma Makalesi

Comparison of Micrometeorological Methods used for the Determination of Actual Evapotranspiration

Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1 25 Mayıs 2018
PDF İndir
EN

Comparison of Micrometeorological Methods used for the Determination of Actual Evapotranspiration

Abstract

Comparison of Micrometeorological Methods used for the Determination of Actual Evapotranspiration

Levent ŞAYLAN1, Yunus Özkoca2*, Barış Çaldağ1, Fatih Bakanoğulları3

1Istanbul Technical University, Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Department of Meteorological Engineering, İstanbul

*Antalya Provincial Disaster and Emergency Directorate,

 Antalya

3Atatürk Soil Water and Agricultural Meteorology Research Institute, Kırklareli

*

* Corresponding Author: yunus.ozkoca@afad.gov.tr 

Abstract:  Among upmost important effects of climatic variability and change are the related variations in type, amount and timing of precipitation at global or regional scales. This aspect causes different effects from the agricultural point of view.  Among these effects the drought phenomenon comes to the forefront.  Efforts on eliminating the agricultural drought problem are mainly made by irrigation.  That’s why the upmost important portion of available water is consumed by agricultural irrigation, globally. Concordantly, the evapotranspiration plays a crucial role on determination of the irrigation water requirement for agriculture and planning the related systems. Usage of the methods on direct measurement of actual evapotranspiration by global means, however; is quite scarce.  In this study, the Bowen Ratio Energy Balance and micrometeorological Eddy Covariance Methods, which are widely in use for the measurement of actual evapotranspiration, have been used within the 2009-2010 wheat growing season in Kırklareli. In conclusion, a comparative evaluation of these approaches was done for the advantages and disadvantages by means of their determination abilities of actual evapotranspiration. 

Key words:  Evaporation, Evapotranspiration, Bowen Ratio, Energy Balance, Eddy Covariance

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Attarod, P., Aoki, M., Bayramzadeh, V. and Ahmadi, M.T. 2011. Micrometeorological observations above a Japanese red pine forest within the growing season. Turkish Journal of Agriculture, 35: 597-609.
  2. Bezerra, B.G. 2012. Crop evapotranspiration and water use efficiency. Irrigation Systems and practices in Challenging Environments, 9: 57-76.
  3. Bowen, I.S. 1926. The ratio of heat lossesby conduction and by evaporation from any water surface. Physical Review, 27: 779-787.
  4. Burba, G. and Anderson, D. 2013. A brief practical guide to Eddy Covariance flux measurements. Lincoln, pp. 6-28, LI-COR Biosciences, Nebraska.
  5. Cheng, C., Nnadi, F. and Liou, Y. 2014. Energy budget on various land use areas using reanalysis data in Florida. Advances in Meteorology, 2014: 1-13.
  6. Dicken, U., Cohen, S. and Tanny, J. 2013. Examination of the Bowen ratio energy balance technique for evapotranspiration estimates in screenhouses. Biosystems Engineering, 114: 397-405.
  7. Fritschen, L.J. and Simpson, J.R. 1989. Surface energy balance and radiation systems: general description and improvements. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 28: 680-689.
  8. Fritschen, L.J. 2010. Accuracy of evapotranspiration determinations by the Bowen ratio method. Hydrological Science Journal, 2: 38-48.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

25 Mayıs 2018

Gönderilme Tarihi

9 Şubat 2018

Kabul Tarihi

25 Mayıs 2018

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2018 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Şaylan, L., Özkoca, Y., Çaldağ, B., & Bakanoğulları, F. (2018). Comparison of Micrometeorological Methods used for the Determination of Actual Evapotranspiration. International Journal of Crop Science and Technology, 4(1), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.26558/ijcst.392854
AMA
1.Şaylan L, Özkoca Y, Çaldağ B, Bakanoğulları F. Comparison of Micrometeorological Methods used for the Determination of Actual Evapotranspiration. IJCST. 2018;4(1):13-22. doi:10.26558/ijcst.392854
Chicago
Şaylan, Levent, Yunus Özkoca, Barış Çaldağ, ve Fatih Bakanoğulları. 2018. “Comparison of Micrometeorological Methods used for the Determination of Actual Evapotranspiration”. International Journal of Crop Science and Technology 4 (1): 13-22. https://doi.org/10.26558/ijcst.392854.
EndNote
Şaylan L, Özkoca Y, Çaldağ B, Bakanoğulları F (01 Mayıs 2018) Comparison of Micrometeorological Methods used for the Determination of Actual Evapotranspiration. International Journal of Crop Science and Technology 4 1 13–22.
IEEE
[1]L. Şaylan, Y. Özkoca, B. Çaldağ, ve F. Bakanoğulları, “Comparison of Micrometeorological Methods used for the Determination of Actual Evapotranspiration”, IJCST, c. 4, sy 1, ss. 13–22, May. 2018, doi: 10.26558/ijcst.392854.
ISNAD
Şaylan, Levent - Özkoca, Yunus - Çaldağ, Barış - Bakanoğulları, Fatih. “Comparison of Micrometeorological Methods used for the Determination of Actual Evapotranspiration”. International Journal of Crop Science and Technology 4/1 (01 Mayıs 2018): 13-22. https://doi.org/10.26558/ijcst.392854.
JAMA
1.Şaylan L, Özkoca Y, Çaldağ B, Bakanoğulları F. Comparison of Micrometeorological Methods used for the Determination of Actual Evapotranspiration. IJCST. 2018;4:13–22.
MLA
Şaylan, Levent, vd. “Comparison of Micrometeorological Methods used for the Determination of Actual Evapotranspiration”. International Journal of Crop Science and Technology, c. 4, sy 1, Mayıs 2018, ss. 13-22, doi:10.26558/ijcst.392854.
Vancouver
1.Levent Şaylan, Yunus Özkoca, Barış Çaldağ, Fatih Bakanoğulları. Comparison of Micrometeorological Methods used for the Determination of Actual Evapotranspiration. IJCST. 01 Mayıs 2018;4(1):13-22. doi:10.26558/ijcst.392854

Cited By