Farmers’ Approaches to Good Agricultural Practices and Adoption and Application Levels of Agricultural Innovations in Çanakkale Province

Abstract

Farmers’ Approaches to Good Agricultural Practices and Adoption and Application Levels of Agricultural Innovations in Çanakkale Province    

Başak Aydın^1*,    Duygu Aktürk²

¹Atatürk Soil Water and Agricultural Meteorology Research Institute, Kırklareli, Turkey

²Çanakkale 18 Mart University Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Economics, Çanakkale, Turkey

[*]

ABSTRACT

 

P

In this study, approaches of the farmers’ to good agricultural practices and agricultural innovations in Çanakkale province was evaluated. Survey studies were conducted with 55 farmers applying good agricultural practices in Çanakkale. The same survey was also conducted with the same number of farmers who did not apply good agricultural practices and total of 110 surveys were conducted. A great majority of the farmers applying good agricultural practices (87.27%) were determined as high level innovators and this ratio was found as 34.55% for the farmers not applying good agricultural practices. As a result of the chi square test which was done in order to determine the difference between the farmers applying and not applying good agricultural practices according to the innovativeness level statistically, it was determined that the difference between the farmers was statistically significant in 1% significance level. In the study, 47.27%, 40%, 34.55%, 32.73%, 25.45% and 10.91% of the farmers stated that they applied good agricultural practices for the security of the workers, obtaining qualified crop, receiving subsidy, less damage to the environment, obtaining more crop and being controlled in each stage respectively. The farmers applying good agricultural practices stated that marketing guarantee must be given to good agriculture crops and subsidy amount for good agricultural practices must be increased. Besides, they stated that studies for informing the farmers about good agricultural practices can be beneficial.

 

Key words: Good agricultural practices, agricultural innovation, Çanakkale

 

---

[*] Corresponding author: [e-mail]

Keywords

• Good agricultural practices,agricultural innovation,Çanakkale

Kaynakça

1. Anonymous 2016. Accessed at; https:// www.tarim.gov.tr/SGB/TARYAT/Belgeler /il_yatirim_rehberleri/canakkale.pdf
2. Anonymous 2017. Accessed at; www.tarim.gov.tr.
3. Ataseven, Y., Z. 2011. Good Agricultural Practices in Turkey (Türkiye'de İyi Tarım Uygulamaları). Agricultural Economic and Policy Development Institute. TEPGE Review. December 2011/ISSN: 1303-8346/No 8. (Tarımsal Ekonomi ve Politika Geliştirme Enstitüsü. TEPGE Bakış. Aralık 2011/ ISSN: 1303-8346/Nüsha 8).
4. Çiçek, A. and Erkan O. 1996. Research and Sampling Methods in Agricultural Economics (Tarım Ekonomisinde Araştırma ve Örnekleme Yöntemleri). Gaziosmanpaşa University, Agricultural Faculty Publications, No: 12, Lecture Notes Series 6, 118p, Tokat (Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları No:12, Ders Notları Serisi 6, 118s, Tokat).
5. Karabat, S., Uysal, H., Kiracı, M.A., Pezikoğlu, F., Subaşı, O.S., İnan, M.S., and Savaş, Y. 2013. Acceptation of novelties and satisfaction level of grape growers in Aegean, Marmara and Mediterranean regions (Ege, Marmara ve Akdeniz Bölgeleri bağcılık işletmelerinde üreticilerin yenilikleri benimseme ve memnuniyet düzeyleri). 8. Viticulture and Technologies Symposium, 25-28 September 2013, Konya (8. Bağcılık ve Teknolojileri Sempozyumu, 25-28 Eylül 2013 Konya).
6. Kızılaslan, N. 2009. Attitudes and behaviors of the farmers towards agricultural extension (Tokat province research Yeşilyurt county) (Çiftçilerin tarımsal yayım konusundaki tutum ve davranışları (Tokat ili Yeşilyurt ilçesi araştırması)). TÜBAV Journal of Science, 2(4): 439-445, Tokat (TÜBAV Bilim Dergisi, 2(4): 439-445, Tokat).
7. Özçatalbaş, O. 2001. Importance of the expansion of the innovations in the society (Yeniliklerin toplumda yayılmasının önemi). Cine Tarım Magazine, 4: 26-27. (Cine Tarım Dergisi, 4: 26-27).
8. Özkan, C. and Engin, Ö.F. 2014. Determination of the Possible Behavioral Changes in Greenhouse Producers Making the Transition from Traditional Methods to Good Agriculture Practices in Terms of the Pest Management: The Case of Kumluca District of Antalya Province (Geleneksel Üretim Yönteminden İyi Tarım Uygulamalarına Geçiş Yapan Örtü Altı Üreticilerinde Zararlı Yönetimi Yönünden Olası Davranış Değişikliklerinin Belirlenmesi: Antalya İli Kumluca İlçesi Örneği). Ankara University Scientific Research Projects, Project No: 12L4347001. (Ankara Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri, Proje No: 12L4347001).

9. Özkaya, T. 1996. Agricultural Extension and Communication (I. Edition) (Tarımsal Yayım ve Haberleşme (I. Basım)). Ege University Agricultural Faculty Publications, İzmir, Publication No: 520 (Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları, İzmir, Yayın No: 520).
10. Öztürk, F.P. 2010. Adoption and Impact Assessment of Innovations in Cherry Enterprises in Isparta Province (Unpublished MSc Thesis) (Isparta İlinde Kiraz İşletmelerinde Yeniliklerin Benimsenme ve Etki Değerlemesi). (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Selçuk University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Agricultural Economics Department (Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Tarım Ekonomisi Anabilim Dalı).
11. Sayın, B., Çelikyurt, M.A., Kuzgun, M. and Aydın, B. (2015). Good agricultural practices approach of greenhouse farmers in Antalya province (Antalya ilinde örtü altı yetiştiriciliği yapan üreticilerin iyi tarım uygulamalarına yaklaşımı). Derim, 32(2): 171-186.
12. Tatlıdil, H. 1997. Expansion and Adoption of Agricultural Innovations (Tarımsal Yeniliklerin Yayılması ve Benimsenmesi). TODAİE, Ankara.