Pareto-based multi-objective whale optimization algorithm for economic-environmental optimal power flow

Öz

This paper presents a Multi-Objective Whale Optimization Algorithm (MOWOA) for solving the Optimal Power Flow (OPF) problem in the IEEE 30-bus test system. The proposed approach simultaneously optimizes four conflicting objectives: fuel cost minimization ($/h), active power loss minimization (MW), voltage deviation minimization (p.u.), and emission reduction (ton/h). A Pareto-based archive mechanism combined with a crowding distance strategy is employed to maintain a well-distributed set of non-dominated solutions. The MOWOA effectively mimics the bubble-net hunting behavior of humpback whales to explore the multi-dimensional search space. Simulation results on the IEEE 30-bus system demonstrate that the proposed algorithm successfully generates a rich Pareto-optimal front comprising 50 non-dominated solutions. The best cost solution achieves 798.34 $/h, which is competitive with state-of-the-art single-objective methods. Comprehensive trade-off analysis reveals that a 62.7% reduction in emissions can be achieved at only a 22.7% increase in fuel cost, offering decision-makers flexible and insightful options for sustainable power system operation.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Optimal power flow
• Multi-objective optimization
• Whale optimization algorithm
• Pareto front
• IEEE 30-bus system

Ekonomik-çevresel optimal güç akışı için pareto tabanlı çok amaçlı balina optimizasyon algoritması

Öz

Bu makale, IEEE 30-bara test sisteminde Optimal Güç Akışı (OPF) problemini çözmek için Çok Amaçlı Balina Optimizasyon Algoritması (MOWOA) sunmaktadır. Önerilen yaklaşım, birbiriyle çelişen dört hedefi eş zamanlı olarak optimize etmektedir: yakıt maliyetinin en aza indirilmesi ($/h), aktif güç kaybının en aza indirilmesi (MW), gerilim sapmasının en aza indirilmesi (p.u.) ve emisyon azaltımı (ton/h). İyi dağıtılmış bir domine edilmemiş çözümler kümesini korumak için Pareto tabanlı bir arşiv mekanizması, yoğunluk mesafesi (crowding distance) stratejisi ile birlikte kullanılmaktadır. MOWOA algoritması, çok boyutlu arama uzayını keşfetmek için kambur balinaların baloncuk ağı (bubble-net) avlanma davranışını taklit ederek çalışmaktadır. IEEE 30-bara test sistemi üzerinde gerçekleştirilen simülasyon sonuçları, önerilen algoritmanın 50 adet domine edilmemiş çözümden oluşan zengin bir Pareto-optimal ön cephe (Pareto front) üretmede başarılı olduğunu göstermektedir. En düşük maliyetli çözüm 798,34 $/h değerine ulaşmış olup, bu sonuç mevcut tek amaçlı en gelişmiş yöntemlerle rekabet edebilecek düzeydedir. Kapsamlı ödünleşim (trade-off) analizi, yakıt maliyetinde yalnızca %22,7’lik bir artış karşılığında emisyonların %62,7 oranında azaltılabileceğini ortaya koymaktadır. Bu durum, sürdürülebilir güç sistemi işletimi için karar vericilere esnek ve değerli seçenekler sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Optimal güç akışı
• Çok amaçlı optimizasyon
• Balina optimizasyon algoritması
• Pareto ön cephesi
• IEEE 30-bara sistemi

Kaynakça

1. Carpentier, J. (1962) Contribution to the economic dispatch problem, Bull. Soc. Fr. Elect., 3: 431-447.
2. Mirjalili, S. and Lewis, A. (2016) The whale optimization algorithm, Adv. Eng. Softw., 95: 51-67.
3. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., and Meyarivan, T. (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 6(2): 182-197.
4. Abido, M.A. (2002) Optimal power flow using particle swarm optimization, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., 24(7): 563-571.
5. Mirjalili, S., Saremi, S., Mirjalili, S.M., and Coelho, L.S. (2016) Multi-objective grey wolf optimizer: A novel algorithm for multi-criterion optimization, Expert Syst. Appl., 47: 106-119.
6. Sulaiman, M.H., Mustaffa, Z., Mohamed, M.R., and Aliman, O. (2015) Using the gray wolf optimizer for solving optimal reactive power dispatch problem, Appl. Soft Comput., 32: 286-292.
7. Mahdad, B. and Srairi, K. (2017) Security constrained optimal power flow solution by a new nonlinear interior point method, Electr. Power Syst. Res., 143: 407-418.
8. Zimmerman, R.D., Murillo-Sanchez, C.E., and Thomas, R.J. (2011) MATPOWER: Steady-state operations, planning, and analysis tools for power systems research and education, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 26(1): 12-19.

9. Kahraman, H.T., Aras, S., and Gedikli, E. (2020) Fitness-distance balance (FDB): A new selection method for meta-heuristic search algorithms, Knowl.-Based Syst., 190: 105169.
10. Mohamed, S.A., Anwer, N., and Mahmoud, M.M. (2025) Solving optimal power flow problem for IEEE-30 bus system using a developed particle swarm optimization method: towards fuel cost minimization, Int. J. Model. Simul., 45(1): 307-320.
11. Yadav, V. and Ghoshal, S.P. (2018) Optimal power flow for IEEE 30 and 118-bus systems using Monarch Butterfly optimization, 2018 Technologies for Smart-City Energy Security and Power (ICSESP), Bhubaneswar, India, March, 1-6.
12. Azizivahed, A., Narimani, H., Naderi, E., Fathi, M., and Narimani, M.R. (2023) Modified differential evolution for optimal operation of battery energy storage systems in hybrid AC/DC smart microgrids. Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE), Tehran, Iran, 503-508.
13. El-Sehiemy, R.A., Shaheen, F., Ginidi, A., and Ghoneim, S.S.M. (2022) Teaching-learning-based optimization for solving the environmental/economic load dispatch problem, Sustainability, 14(3): 1534.
14. Yapici, H. and Cetinkaya, N. (2019) A new meta-heuristic optimizer: Pathfinder algorithm, Appl. Soft Comput., 78: 545-568.
15. Dosoglu, M.K., Guvenc, U., Duman, S., Sonmez, Y., and Kahraman, H.T. (2018) Symbiotic organisms search optimization algorithm for economic/emission dispatch problem in power systems, Neural Comput. Appl., 29(3): 721-737.
16. Ahmadianfar, I., Heidari, A.A., Gandomi, A.H., Chu, X., and Chen, H. (2021) RUN beyond the metaphor: An efficient optimization algorithm based on Runge Kutta method, Expert Syst. Appl., 181: 115079.
17. Kaur, S., Awasthi, L.K., Sangal, A.L., and Dhiman, G. (2020) Tunicate swarm algorithm: A new bio-inspired based metaheuristic paradigm for global optimization, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 90: 103541.
18. Web Page: IEEE 30-bus test system data, https://labs.ece.uw.edu/pstca/pf30/pg_tca30bus.htm Last access date: 06.01.2026.
19. Borges, L.T.M., da Silva, F.B., Soler, E., and Nepomuceno, L. (2026) A directed genetic algorithm for economic dispatch and network-constrained economic dispatch: Convergence proof, Appl. Soft Comput., 186: 114123.
20. Guvenc, U., Altun, B.E., and Duman, S. (2012) Optimal power flow using genetic algorithm based on similarity, Energy Educ. Sci. Technol., Part A: Energy Sci. Res., 29(1): 1-10.
21. Demirbas, M., Duman, S., Ozkaya, B., Balci, Y., Ersoy, D., Döşoğlu, M. K., Guvenc, U., Altun, B. E., Uzel, H., and Kaymaz, E. (2025) Fuzzy-Based Fitness–Distance Balance Snow Ablation Optimizer Algorithm for Optimal Generation Planning in Power Systems. Energies, 18(12), 3048.
22. Altun, B. E., Kaymaz, E., Dursun, M., and Guvenc, U. (2024) Hyper-FDB-INFO Algorithm for Optimal Placement and Sizing of FACTS Devices in Wind Power-Integrated Optimal Power Flow Problem. Energies, 17(23), 6087.
23. Mouassa, S., Alateeq, A., Alassaf, A., Bayindir, R., Alsaleh, I., and Jurado, F. (2024) Optimal power flow analysis with renewable energy resource uncertainty using dwarf mongoose optimizer: Case of ADRAR isolated electrical network, IEEE Access, 12: 10202-10218.
24. Hassan, A.Y., Ismaeel, A.A., Said, M., Ghoniem, R.M., Deb, S., and Elsayed, A.G. (2022) Evaluation of weighted mean of vectors algorithm for identification of solar cell parameters, Processes, 10: 1072.
25. Snášel, V., Rizk-Allah, R.M., Izci, D., and Ekinci, S. (2023) Weighted mean of vectors optimization algorithm and its application in designing the power system stabilizer, Appl. Soft Comput., 136: 110085.
26. Abd El-Sattar, H., Houssein, E.H., Hashim, F.A., and Kamel, S. (2024) Optimal design of hybrid renewable energy sources with battery storage using an efficient weighted mean of vectors algorithm, J. Energy Storage, 87: 111387.
27. Bai, X., Wei, H., Fujisawa, K., and Wang, Y. (2008) Semidefinite programming for optimal power flow problems, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., 30: 383-392.
28. Bhattacharya, A. and Chattopadhyay, P.K. (2011) Application of biogeography-based optimisation to solve different optimal power flow problems, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 5: 70-80.
29. Mishra, C., Singh, S.P., and Rokadia, J. (2015) Optimal power flow in the presence of wind power using modified cuckoo search, IET Gener. Transm., 9: 615-626.
30. Nusair, K. and Alasali, F. (2020) Optimal power flow management system for a power network with stochastic renewable energy resources using golden ratio optimization method, Energies, 13: 3671.
31. Riaz, M., Hanif, A., Masood, H., Khan, M.A., Afaq, K., Kang, B.G., and Nam, Y. (2021) An optimal power flow solution of a system integrated with renewable sources using a hybrid optimizer, Sustainability, 13: 13382.
32. Mouassa, S., Althobaiti, A., Jurado, F., and Ghoneim, S.S. (2022) Novel design of slim mould optimizer for the solution of optimal power flow problems incorporating intermittent sources: A case study of Algerian electricity grid, IEEE Access, 10: 22646-22661.
33. Maheshwari, A., Sood, Y.R., and Jaiswal, S. (2023) Flow direction algorithm-based optimal power flow analysis in the presence of stochastic renewable energy sources, Electr. Power Syst. Res., 216: 109087.
34. Ozkaya, B. (2024) Enhanced growth optimizer algorithm with dynamic fitness-distance balance method for solution of security-constrained optimal power flow problem in the presence of stochastic wind and solar energy, Appl. Energy, 368: 123499.
35. Inkollu, S.R. and Kota, V.R. (2016) Optimal setting of FACTS devices for voltage stability improvement using PSO adaptive GSA hybrid algorithm, Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J., 19(3): 1166-1176.
36. Ebeed, M., Mostafa, A., Aly, M.M., Jurado, F., and Kamel, S. (2023) Stochastic optimal power flow analysis of power systems with wind/PV/TCSC using a developed Runge Kutta optimizer, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., 152: 109250.
37. Wolpert, D.H. and Macready, W.G. (1997) No free lunch theorems for optimization, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 1: 67-82.