A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INFORMATION-SEEKING BEHAVIOR AND DIGITAL INFORMATION NEEDS OF FARMERS IN TURKEY AND SWEDEN

Abstract

Individuals use information as and manage information which make them evolve as part of the globalization process in today’s global and virtual world (Marchionini, 1995). Information is a practical tool facilitating the life flow of individuals. This tool is used by individuals in order to resolve the problems, uncertainties and chaotic situations in their life. A series of attitudes in targetoriented resolution process is called information seeking behavior (Singh & Satija, 2007). Information seeking behavior and information are interwoven tools creating a circulation serving the target of various information user groups. Farmers are one of the sub-groups using information to contribute to the constitution of a green world. The information they seek in their occupational life will facilitate the daily running of their occupation and certain digital information from different resources are also increasingly becoming available for their use. In our study, information seeking behavior and information needs of the farmers in Fethiye, a county in Turkey as a developing country, and Gothenburg in Sweden as a developed country, were analyzed. 60 farmers in Turkey and 60 farmers in Sweden were included within the scope of our study. What kind of information they seek and what kind of searching tools (internet, journals, books, asking people, applying to the reference desks in the public libraries) they use will be analyzed further in our study, where a descriptive method was used. A questionnaire was used as a data collection tool. Our target group was chosen randomly among the farmers in Fethiye and Gothenburg. It is a comparative study in which findings acquired in two different countries shall be handled taking the country development criteria into consideration. In accordance with the country development criteria, findings will be compared and recommendations are provided. Based upon the acquired findings, recommendations are given about the development of information literacy services and programs for the farmers

Keywords

• farmers, information seeking behavior, information needs, Turkey, Sweden, e-Government

Kaynakça

1. Adomi, E.E., Ogbomo, M. O. and Inoni, M.O. (2003), Gender factor in crop farmers’ access to agricultural information in rural areas of Delta State, Nigeria,
2. Library Review, Vol. 52 Iss 8 pp. 388 – 393. Agriculture Monitoring and Information System Project. Accessed from http://www.tarbil.org/ in 10.08.2016.
3. Aina, L. O. (2012). The information environment of agricultural stakeholders in
4. Botswana. Information Development, 28(2), 149-159. Babu, S.C., Glendenning, K. A. & Govindarajan, S. K. (2011). Farmers’ information needs and search behaviors: Case study in Tamil Nadu, India,
5. INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE. Bachhav, N. B. (2012). Information Needs of the Rural Farmers: A Study from
6. Maharashtra, India: A Survey, Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). Paper http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/866 Brink, J., Dahlander, L., & McKelvey, M. (2007). Developing capabilities: An analysis of biotechnology in two regions in Australia and Sweden. European
7. Planning Studies, 15(6), 727-751. Economic Times (2016). Accessed from http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/definition/human-development-index 10.2016.
8. Elly, T. and Silayo. E. E. (2013). Agricultural information needs and sources of the rural farmers in Tanzania: A case of Irınga rural district, Library Review, (8/9), 547-566.

9. EU SCAR (2012). Agricultural knowledge and innovation systems in transition- a reflection paper, Brussels.
10. Fethiye Chamber of Commerce and Industry, accessed from http://www.fto.org.tr/Fethiye_genel_tanitim.aspx address in 11.07.2015.)
11. Food Science Sweden. (n. d.). Om Food Science Sweden. Retrieved Retrieved June 2015, 26 from http://foodsciencesweden.se/om-fss/om-food-science-sweden/
12. Grieve, R., Witteveen, K., & Tolan, G. A. (2014). Social Media as a Tool for Data
13. Collection: Examining Equivalence of Socially Value-Laden Constructs. Current Psychology, 33(4), 532-544. Gustavsson, J. (1998). Swedish measures to reduce ammonia emissions. Nutrient
14. Cycling in Agroecosystems, 51(1), 81-83. Jonsson, R., Sall, T., & Bryngelsson, T. (2000). Genetic diversity for random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers in two Swedish populations of
15. Pyrenophora teres. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology-Revue Canadienne De Phytopathologie, 22(3), 258-264. Human Development Reports, accessed from http://hdr.undp.org/en in 07.2015.
16. Länstyrelse i Västra Götaland. (2015a). Agriculture and rural areas Retrieved June , 26 from http://www.lansstyrelsen.se/vastragotaland/En/lantbruk-och- landsbygd/Pages/default.aspx
17. Länstyrelse i Västra Götaland. (2015b). Västra Götaland County Retrieved June , 26 from http://www.lansstyrelsen.se/vastragotaland/En/om- lansstyrelsen/vastra-gotaland-county/Pages/default.aspx
18. Marchionini, G. (1995). Information Seeking in Electronic Environments,
19. Cambridge University Press, New York, USA. Meng, Z. (2013). Scable Simple Random Sampling and Stratified Sampling.
20. Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Machine Learning, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 2013. JMLR: W&CP. Vol. 28.
21. Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock, accessed from https://www.turkiye.gov.tr/gida-tarim-ve-hayvancilik-bakanligi) in 20.09.2016.
22. Meitei, L.S. and Devi, T.P. (2009). Farmers information needs in rural Manipur: an assessment. Anaals of Library and Information Studies. Vol. 56. pp.35-40.
23. Nyareza, S., & Dick, A. L. (2012). Use of community radio to communicate agricultural information to Zimbabwe's peasant farmers. Aslib Proceedings, 64(5), 508.
24. Opara, U.N. (2008). Agricultural information sources used by farmers in Imo
25. State, Nigera. Information Development. Vol. 24, No. 4. pp. 289-295. Padel, S. (2001). Conversion to Organic Milk Production: the Change Process and Farmers’ Information Needs. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Wales, Aberystwyth
26. Ramirez, R. (1997). Gatekeeper 66: Understanding farmers’ communication networks: Combining PRA with agricultural knowledge systems analysis.
27. Accessed through pubs.iied.org/612OIIED.html on 12.07.2015.
28. Singh, K.P. and Satija, M.P. (2007). Information seeking behavior of agricultural scientists with particlar reference to their information seeking strategies. Annals of library and information studies, 54, 213-220
29. Southern Aegean Development Agency, accessed from http://geka.org.tr/icerik/0/192/fethiye.html in 13.07.2015
30. Stanton, E. A.(2007). The Human Development Index: A History, 127, Working paper Series.
31. Swigon, M. (2014). Personal knowledge and information management behaviour in the light of the comparative studies among Polish and German students.
32. Information Research-an International Electronic Journal, 19(4). Sverige officiella statistik. (2013). Jordbrukarhushållens inkomster 2013 /
33. Incomes of agricultural households 2013: JO 42 SM 1501. Retrieved June 2015, from http://www.scb.se/Statistik/JO/JO0204/2013A01J/JO0204_2013A01J_SM_JO42S M1501.pdf
34. Zhao, Y. F., Zhang, R. J., & Klein, K. K. (2009). Perceived information needs and availability: results of a survey of small dairy farmers in Inner Mongolia.
35. Information Research-an International Electronic Journal, 14(3). Retrieved June , 26 from http://www.informationr.net/ir/14-3/paper411.htm