DEVELOPMENTS AND PROSPECTS IN e–GOVERNMENT IMPLEMENTATIONS IN TURKEY

Öz

21st century is the age of globalization. Globalization is the process of transforming regional or local developments and phenomena into global realities. Globalization is also a process that unifies the world into a single society which is a combination of economical, social, political and technological influences. The most substantial actor in this process is the Internet and its contributions to data and knowledge procurement among the states, legal and natural persons. Moreover, Turkey is one of the leading states in the world to encourage the use of Internet and e – government implementations to integrate Turkey with that of the world and render premium services to her citizens and other related entities. The e – government which is also known as e- gov, online government or digital government, is a concept to utilize the Internet technology as a means to exchange information, provide services and transactions with citizens, business and other branches of government. Some e – government implementations both in practice and forthcoming in Turkey are e – Government Gateway, Public Sector Network, Informantions Disaster Recover System and Justice Net. It is aimed to constitute and develop knowledge society; to facilitate access to knowledge, decrease time consumption, provide better access to public services and enhance efficiency, ensure transparency and accountability, lower the costs and save sources in Turkey by e- government regulations. The aim of this study is to reveal the developments and realities of e – government in Turkey theoretically depending on comprehensive international and national publications

Anahtar Kelimeler

• e – Government, Internet, implementation, information, Turkey

Kaynakça

1. ALICAN, Fuat (2007); “Experts without expertise: E-society projects in developing countries – The case of Turkey”, Information Polity, Vol.12, pp.255-263.
2. BEKKERS, Victor; HOMBURG, Vincent (2007); “The Myths of E-Government: Looking
3. Beyond the Assumptions of a New and Better Government”, The Information Society, Vol.23, pp. 373-382. BOLGHERINI, Silvia (2007); “The technology trap and the role of political and cultural variables: A critical analysis of the e-government policies”, Review of Policy Research, Vol.24, No.3, pp 259-275.
4. CALISTA, Donald; MELITSKI, James (2007); “E-government and E-governance:
5. Converging Constructs of Public sector information and communications technologies”, Public Administration Quarterly, Vol.31, No.1, pp.87-120. COURSEY, David; NORRIS, Donald (2008); “Models of E-Governmnet: Are they correct? An Emprical Assessment”, Public Administration Review, May/June, pp. 523-536.
6. DOVIFAT, Angela; BRÜGGEMEIER, Martin; LENK, Klaus (2007); “The “model of micropolitical arenas” – A framework to understand the innovation process of e- government-projects”, Information Polity, Vol.12, pp.127-138.
7. HEEKS, Richard (2003); “Most egovernment – for development projects fail: how can be risks reduced?”, Manchester: Institute for Development Policy and Management, IDPM i
8. Government Working Paper no.14. IRKNIN, Iu (2007); “Electronic Government and Society”, Sociological Research, Vol.46, No.2, pp.77-92.

9. REDDICK, Christopher (2007); “E-government and its influence on managerial effectiveness: A survey of Florida and Texas City managers”, Financial Accountability and Management, Vol.23, No.1, pp. 1-26.
10. ROBBINS, Mark; SIMONSEN, Bill; FELDMAN, Barry (2008); “Citizens and Resource
11. Allocation: Improving Decision Making with Interactive Web-Based Citizen Participation”, Public Administration Review, May/June, 2008, pp. 564-576.
12. ROY, Jeffrey (2006); “E-government and local governance in Canada: An examination of front line challenges and federal tensions”, Public Administration Quarterly, Vol.10, No.2, pp.218-255.
13. TOLBERT, Carroline; MOSSBERGER, Karen; McNEAL, Ramona (2008); “Institutions,
14. Policy Innovation and E-Government in the American States”, Public Administration Review, May/June, pp.549-552. TOLBERT, Caroline; MOSSBERGER, Karen (2006); “The Effects off E-Government on
15. Trust and Confidence in Government”, Public Administration Review, May/June 2006, 369.
16. TORRES, Lourdes; PINA, Vincente; ACERETE, Basilio (2006); “E-Governance
17. Developments in European Union Cities: Reshaping Government’s Relationship with Citizens”, International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, Vol.19, NO.2, PP.277-302. TORRES, Lourdes; PINA, Vincente; ACERETE, Basilio: 2006; ROCHELEAU, Bruce
18. (2007); “Whither E-Governmnet”, Public Administration Review, Vol.67, No.3, pp.584
19. TRIMI, Silvana; SHENG, Hong (2008); “Emerging trends in M – GOVERNMENT”,
20. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, Vol.51, No.5, pp.53-58. SINNGH, Gurmet; BELWAL, Rakesh (2007); “E-governance and Corruption developments and issues in Ethiopia”, Public Organization Review, Vol.7, pp.195 -208.
21. YANG, Kaifeng; RHO, Seung-Young (2007); E-Government for Better Performance:
22. Promises, Realities and Challenges”, International Journal of Public Administration, Vol.30, pp.1197-1217.
23. State Planning Organization of Turkey, Information Society Strategy, Action Plan, 2006 - (www.dpt.gov.tr).
24. State Planning Organization of Turkey, Information Society Strategy, (www.dpt.gov.tr). IDABC, European eGovernmnet Servives, Turkey eGovernmnet Factsheet, November (http://epractice.eu) OECD IT Outlook Report 2004.