TOPIC MODEL IMPLEMENTATION TO FIND RELATED DOCUMENTS IN CORPORATE ARCHIVES IN REAL LIFE: “A CASE SCENARIO ON KNOWLEDGE RETRIEVAL”

Öz

Today’s organizations were mostly built over their documents. These documents are very crucial sources of knowledge. Even they know the existence of these documents, most of the time, it is nearly impossible to extract captive knowledge inside. In these conditions, organizations choose re-prepare same document again rather than finding proper documents in the archives. On the other hand, finding these documents would save precious time and decrease redundancy of the work. Topic model idea basically focuses on extraction of knowledge from these types of documents. In this study, our aim is to give a summary of Topic Model research and try to explain latest model concept over an imaginary case scenario

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Topic Model, Knowledge Extraction, Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA), Probabilistic Latent Semantic Analysis (pLSA) ,Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA)

Kaynakça

1. Blei, Ng, Jordan,(2003), “Latent Dirichlet Allocation”, Journal of. Machine. Learning. Vol..3, pp. 993–1022.
2. Davenport, Prusak, (2000), Working Knowledge:How Organizations Manage
3. What They Know, Boston, Harward Business School Press. Deerwester, Dumais, Furnas, Landauer, Harshman (1990), “Indexing by Latent
4. Semantic Analysis” Journal of the American Society for Information Science, , Vol.41,No.6,pp.391-407. Gethers, Poshyvanyk,(2010),“Using Relational Topic Models to Capture
5. Coupling among Classes in Object-Oriented Software Systems”, IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, 2010.
6. Girolami, Kabán, (2003), “On an equivalence between PLSI and LDA”, in: Proc.
7. Annu. ACM SIGIR Int. Conf. on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, , pp. 433–434. Griffiths, Steyvers, (2004) “Finding scientific topics”, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. Vol.101 No.1 , pp. 5228–5235.
8. Hofmann (1999), “Probabilistic latent semantic indexing”, in: Proc. 22nd Annu.

9. ACM SIGIR Int. Conf. on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Berkeley, CA, USA, , pp. 50–57. Kakkonen, Myller, Sutinen, Timonen.(2008) “Comparison of Dimension
10. Reduction Methods for Automated Essay Grading”, Educational Technology & Society;Vol.11, No.3,pp.275-288. Linstead, Rigor, Bajracharya, Lopes, Baldi,(2007), “Mining concepts from code with probabilistic topic models”, in: Proc. 22nd IEEE/ACM Int. Conf. on Automated
11. Lukins, Kraft, Etzkorn.(2010),”Bug localization using latent Dirichlet allocation”.
12. Information and Software Technology Vol.52, No.9,pp.972-990. Poshyvanyk, Guéhéneuc, Marcus, G. Antoniol, Rajlich (2006), “Combining probabilistic ranking and latent semantic indexing for feature location”, in:Proc. th IEEE Int. Conf. on Program Comprehension, Athens, Greece, , pp. 137–148.
13. Steyvers, Griffiths, (2007), “Probabilistic topic models”, (in: Landauer,
14. McNamara, Dennis, Kintsch-Ed, Handbook of Latent Semantic Analysis, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.. Tian, Revelle, Poshyvanyk.(2009), “Using Latent Dirichlet Allocation for
15. Automatic Categorization of Software”. 6th Ieee International Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories pp.163-166. Wei, Croft,(2006) “LDA-based document models for ad-hoc retrieval”, in: Proc. th Annu. Int. ACM SIGIR Conf. on Research & Development on Information
16. Retrieval, WA, USA , pp. 178–185. Zheng, McLean, Lu, (2006), “Identifying biological concepts from a protein- related corpus with a probabilistic topic model”. Bmc Bioinformatics Vol.7.
17. Park, Ramamohanarao,.(2009), “The Sensitivity of Latent Dirichlet Allocation for
18. Information Retrieval”. (In: Buntine, Grobelnik, Mladenić, Shawe-Taylor-Ed. ,Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases): Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 176-188.