Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

CRITICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENTS IN THE INTERFACE BETWEEN GOOD GOVERNANCE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

Yıl 2019, , 1 - 15, 17.06.2019
https://doi.org/10.34111/ijebeg.20191111

Öz

The article explores the interface between good governance and sustainable development by focusing specifically on the role of governments in the global sustainable development agenda. With this context in mind, the purpose of this article is to highlight the role that governments should play in sustainable development in terms of the notions of ‘good’ governance as a prerequisite for a specific country’s ability and capacity to successfully plan and execute development initiatives, to participate in the global economy and to adhere to the imperatives that emanate from international treaties and conventions regarding sustainable development. The article adopted a qualitative observational approach by comparing, contrasting, critically analysing and synthesising relevant documentary and literature sources in terms of recent data, statistics and knowledge pertaining to a historical and regulatory overview directing good governance and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), as well as the variables influencing global and African governments in pursuit of these goals. To eliminate bias and promote conceptual and contextual analysis, the research method also included specific unobtrusive research techniques, such as concept analysis, historical analysis and documentary analysis. The study found that the reforms pushed by the World Bank are not prioritised and that recipient countries, which are forced to implement them, are not given an idea of how long it would take to carry them out. As a result, recipient countries undertake a multitude of governance reforms at the same time, which are differentially supported by a plethora of donors. Often little thought is given to their sequencing, interdependence, or relative contributions to the overall goal of creating more efficient, effective and responsive governments. This is exacerbated by the fact that many developing countries do not have the required resources to successfully implement the reforms required for good governance.

Kaynakça

  • Abrahamsen, R. (2000). Disciplining Democracy: Development Discourse and Good Governance in Africa. New York, NY: Zed Books.
  • Africa Growth Initiative (2016). Foresight Africa: Top Priorities for the Continent 2016. http://providencemag.com. Accessed 2018/02/04.
  • Aucoin, P. (2012). New political governance in Westminster systems: Impartial public administration and management performance at risk. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 25(2), 177-199.
  • Auriacombe, C. J. (2017). Government, environment and sustainable development. UJ Internal Handbook PMG 1B. Johannesburg: University of Johannesburg.
  • Auriacombe, C.J. (2017. Towards the construction of unobtrusive research techniques: Critical considerations when conducting a literature analysis. African Journal of Public Affairs. 9(4), 1-19.
  • Auriacombe, C.J. 2007. Unobtrusive research methods: critical issues. Journal of Public Administration. 42(6). November 2007.
  • Auriacombe, C.J. & Jarbandhan, V. (2015). The Dimensions of Environmental Leadership: Bringing together the nexus of Sustainable Development, the Environment and Leadership. Administratio Publica, 23(4), 116-143.
  • Ayittey, G.B.N. (1997). Africa in Chaos. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
  • Cloete, F. & Auriacombe, C.J. (2013). Measuring Empowerment in Democratic Developmental States. Africa Insight, 43(2), 14-26.
  • Evers, A. (2005). Mixed welfare systems and hybrid organizations: Changes in the governance and provision of social services. International Journal of Public Administration, 28 (9/10), 737-748.
  • Gallup (2014). Record high in U.S. say big government greatest threat. http://www.gallup.com/ Accessed 2017/12/6.
  • Gallup (2015). Trust in Government. http://www.gallup.com. Accessed 2017/12/06.
  • Glass, L.K. (1989). Historical Research. In Brink, P.J. and Wood, M.J. 1989. (Eds.) Advanced Design in Nursing Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Graham, J., Amos, B. and Plumptre, T. (2003) Principles for Good Governance in the 21st Century. Institute on Governance. Policy Brief No.15.
  • Guttman, D. (2008). Government by contract: Considering a public service ethics to match the reality of the “blended” public work force. http://law.emory.edu/. Accessed 2018/03/05.
  • Leftwich, A. (1996). On the primacy of politics in development. In Leftwich, A. (Ed.) Democracy and Development: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Martinez, C. and Mueller, M. 2015. The SDGs: Opportunities for conservation. Environmental Policy and Law, 45(6), 238-273.
  • Maxwell, J.A. (2005). Qualitative research design: an interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Mazrui, A. (1986). The Africans: A Triple Heritage. London: BBC Publications.
  • Milward, H.B. and Provan, K.G. (2000). A Manager’s Guide on Choosing and Using Collaborative Networks. Arizona: IBM Center for the Business of Government. http://www.srpc.ca/. Accessed 2018/3/03.
  • New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD). (2010). The African Peer Review Mechanism – An overview. http://www.nepad.org/ . Accessed 2017/05/07.
  • Philip, G. (1999). The dilemmas of good governance: A Latin American perspective. Government and Opposition, 34(2), 226-242.
  • Pierre, J. (2000). Debating Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Potter, R.B. and Desai, V. (2008). The Companion to Development Studies. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Slack, L. (2015). The post-2015 global agenda – A role for local government. Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance, 16(17), 173-177.
  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (1997). Governance for Sustainable Human Development. New York, NY: UNDP.
  • United Nations General Assembly (2012). The future we want. http://www.un.org/. Accessed 2017/05/22.
  • United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA) (2003). Sustainable development indicators. http://www1.uneca.org/. Accessed 2018/02/20.
  • Van der Waldt, G. (2017). Africa and Sustainability: Governance Functions and Applications. UJ Internal Handbook – Learning Material Section A. Johannesburg: University of Johannesburg.
  • Willis, K. (2005). Theories and Practices of Development. London: Routledge.
  • World Bank. (2007). World Development Report 2007: Development and the Next Generation. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. Accessed 2017/06/22.
Yıl 2019, , 1 - 15, 17.06.2019
https://doi.org/10.34111/ijebeg.20191111

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Abrahamsen, R. (2000). Disciplining Democracy: Development Discourse and Good Governance in Africa. New York, NY: Zed Books.
  • Africa Growth Initiative (2016). Foresight Africa: Top Priorities for the Continent 2016. http://providencemag.com. Accessed 2018/02/04.
  • Aucoin, P. (2012). New political governance in Westminster systems: Impartial public administration and management performance at risk. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 25(2), 177-199.
  • Auriacombe, C. J. (2017). Government, environment and sustainable development. UJ Internal Handbook PMG 1B. Johannesburg: University of Johannesburg.
  • Auriacombe, C.J. (2017. Towards the construction of unobtrusive research techniques: Critical considerations when conducting a literature analysis. African Journal of Public Affairs. 9(4), 1-19.
  • Auriacombe, C.J. 2007. Unobtrusive research methods: critical issues. Journal of Public Administration. 42(6). November 2007.
  • Auriacombe, C.J. & Jarbandhan, V. (2015). The Dimensions of Environmental Leadership: Bringing together the nexus of Sustainable Development, the Environment and Leadership. Administratio Publica, 23(4), 116-143.
  • Ayittey, G.B.N. (1997). Africa in Chaos. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
  • Cloete, F. & Auriacombe, C.J. (2013). Measuring Empowerment in Democratic Developmental States. Africa Insight, 43(2), 14-26.
  • Evers, A. (2005). Mixed welfare systems and hybrid organizations: Changes in the governance and provision of social services. International Journal of Public Administration, 28 (9/10), 737-748.
  • Gallup (2014). Record high in U.S. say big government greatest threat. http://www.gallup.com/ Accessed 2017/12/6.
  • Gallup (2015). Trust in Government. http://www.gallup.com. Accessed 2017/12/06.
  • Glass, L.K. (1989). Historical Research. In Brink, P.J. and Wood, M.J. 1989. (Eds.) Advanced Design in Nursing Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Graham, J., Amos, B. and Plumptre, T. (2003) Principles for Good Governance in the 21st Century. Institute on Governance. Policy Brief No.15.
  • Guttman, D. (2008). Government by contract: Considering a public service ethics to match the reality of the “blended” public work force. http://law.emory.edu/. Accessed 2018/03/05.
  • Leftwich, A. (1996). On the primacy of politics in development. In Leftwich, A. (Ed.) Democracy and Development: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Martinez, C. and Mueller, M. 2015. The SDGs: Opportunities for conservation. Environmental Policy and Law, 45(6), 238-273.
  • Maxwell, J.A. (2005). Qualitative research design: an interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Mazrui, A. (1986). The Africans: A Triple Heritage. London: BBC Publications.
  • Milward, H.B. and Provan, K.G. (2000). A Manager’s Guide on Choosing and Using Collaborative Networks. Arizona: IBM Center for the Business of Government. http://www.srpc.ca/. Accessed 2018/3/03.
  • New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD). (2010). The African Peer Review Mechanism – An overview. http://www.nepad.org/ . Accessed 2017/05/07.
  • Philip, G. (1999). The dilemmas of good governance: A Latin American perspective. Government and Opposition, 34(2), 226-242.
  • Pierre, J. (2000). Debating Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Potter, R.B. and Desai, V. (2008). The Companion to Development Studies. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Slack, L. (2015). The post-2015 global agenda – A role for local government. Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance, 16(17), 173-177.
  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (1997). Governance for Sustainable Human Development. New York, NY: UNDP.
  • United Nations General Assembly (2012). The future we want. http://www.un.org/. Accessed 2017/05/22.
  • United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA) (2003). Sustainable development indicators. http://www1.uneca.org/. Accessed 2018/02/20.
  • Van der Waldt, G. (2017). Africa and Sustainability: Governance Functions and Applications. UJ Internal Handbook – Learning Material Section A. Johannesburg: University of Johannesburg.
  • Willis, K. (2005). Theories and Practices of Development. London: Routledge.
  • World Bank. (2007). World Development Report 2007: Development and the Next Generation. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. Accessed 2017/06/22.
Toplam 31 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Christelle Auriacombe Bu kişi benim 0000-0002-9807-4125

Shikha Vyas-doorgapersad Bu kişi benim 0000-0002-8146-344X

Yayımlanma Tarihi 17 Haziran 2019
Gönderilme Tarihi 6 Ocak 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019

Kaynak Göster

APA Auriacombe, C., & Vyas-doorgapersad, S. (2019). CRITICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENTS IN THE INTERFACE BETWEEN GOOD GOVERNANCE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES. International Journal of EBusiness and EGovernment Studies, 11(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.34111/ijebeg.20191111
AMA Auriacombe C, Vyas-doorgapersad S. CRITICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENTS IN THE INTERFACE BETWEEN GOOD GOVERNANCE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES. IJEBEG. Haziran 2019;11(1):1-15. doi:10.34111/ijebeg.20191111
Chicago Auriacombe, Christelle, ve Shikha Vyas-doorgapersad. “CRITICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENTS IN THE INTERFACE BETWEEN GOOD GOVERNANCE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES”. International Journal of EBusiness and EGovernment Studies 11, sy. 1 (Haziran 2019): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.34111/ijebeg.20191111.
EndNote Auriacombe C, Vyas-doorgapersad S (01 Haziran 2019) CRITICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENTS IN THE INTERFACE BETWEEN GOOD GOVERNANCE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES. International Journal of eBusiness and eGovernment Studies 11 1 1–15.
IEEE C. Auriacombe ve S. Vyas-doorgapersad, “CRITICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENTS IN THE INTERFACE BETWEEN GOOD GOVERNANCE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES”, IJEBEG, c. 11, sy. 1, ss. 1–15, 2019, doi: 10.34111/ijebeg.20191111.
ISNAD Auriacombe, Christelle - Vyas-doorgapersad, Shikha. “CRITICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENTS IN THE INTERFACE BETWEEN GOOD GOVERNANCE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES”. International Journal of eBusiness and eGovernment Studies 11/1 (Haziran 2019), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.34111/ijebeg.20191111.
JAMA Auriacombe C, Vyas-doorgapersad S. CRITICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENTS IN THE INTERFACE BETWEEN GOOD GOVERNANCE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES. IJEBEG. 2019;11:1–15.
MLA Auriacombe, Christelle ve Shikha Vyas-doorgapersad. “CRITICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENTS IN THE INTERFACE BETWEEN GOOD GOVERNANCE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES”. International Journal of EBusiness and EGovernment Studies, c. 11, sy. 1, 2019, ss. 1-15, doi:10.34111/ijebeg.20191111.
Vancouver Auriacombe C, Vyas-doorgapersad S. CRITICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENTS IN THE INTERFACE BETWEEN GOOD GOVERNANCE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES. IJEBEG. 2019;11(1):1-15.