TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE IN A SMALL EUROPEAN COUNTRY: A PATENT- BASED ANALYSIS FOR GREECE

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2, 61 - 70, 01.12.2012

Maria Markatou

Öz

The description of the development of the Greek technological change is the main
aim of this paper. The analysis is based on the examination and elaboration of
patent records and relies on the study of their technological content and their
economic direction. Results show that technological change focuses on producing
new technologies for the ‘agricultural sector’, ‘food’, ‘pharmaceuticals’, ‘metal
shaping-separation’, ‘rubber-plastic products’, ‘building-housing’, ‘instruments’
and ‘electricity’. These technological fields are related to the economic activities
of ‘food-beverages’, ‘chemicals’, ‘rubber-plastics’ and ‘metal products’,
‘machinery-equipment’, and ‘electronic-communication equipment’. Results also
show that technological change follows two different but clear patterns. Based on
the first pattern, technological change is directed to new economic sub- activities
but inside the existing firm’s production lines. Most firms of ‘food-beverages’,
‘chemicals’ and ‘electrical machinery-equipment’ are characterized by this
pattern. Based on the second pattern, technological change is directed to new
economic activities, outside the firm’s production lines. Half firms of ‘machineryequipment’
as well as several persistent Greek firm innovators follow this pattern.
Results may have important implications for public innovation policy regarding
targets, tools and particularly measures.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Greece, New technology, Patents, Technological change

Kaynakça

• Archibugi, Daniele and Mario Pianta (1996), “Measuring tchnological change through patents and innovation surveys”, Technovation, Vol. 16, No. 9, pp. 451- 468.
• Breschi, Stephano, Francesco Lissoni and Franco Malerba (2003), “Knowledge- relatedness in firm technological diversification”, Research Policy, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 69-87.
• Cohen, Wesley, Richard Nelson and John Walsh (2000), “Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why US manufacturing firms patent or not” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 7552, USA: NBER.
• Crépon, Bruno, Emmanuel Duguet and Jacques Mairesse (2000), “Mesurer le rendement de l’innovation”, Economie et Statistique, Vol. 334, No. 1, pp. 65-78 (in french).
• Engelsman, Robert and Antony Van Raan (1994), “A patent-based cartography of technology”, Research Policy, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 1-26.
• Griliches, Zvi (1990), “Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 1661-1707.
• Grupp, Hariolf (1998), Foundations of the Economics of Innovation: theory, measurement, and practice, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
• Guellec, Dominique and Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie (2000), “Applications, Grants and the Value of a Patent”, Economics Letters, Vol. 69, pp. 109-114.
• Jaffe, Ariel (1989), “Characterising the technological position of firms with application to quantifying technological opportunity and research spillovers”, Research Policy, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 87-97.
• Lanjouw, Jean and Ashoka Mody (1996), “Innovation and the International Diffusion of Environmentally Responsive Technology”, Research Policy, Vol 25, No. 4, pp. 549-571.
• Levin, Richard, Alvin Klevorick, Richard Nelson and Sidney Winter (1987). “Appropriating the returns from industrial R&D”, Brookings papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 783-820.
• Malerba, Franco and Luigi Orsenigo (1996), “The Dynamics and Evolution of Industries”, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 51-87.
• Marinova, Dova and Michael Mc Aleer (2003), “Modelling trends and volatility in ecological patents in the USA”, Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol. 21, No. 9, pp. 1273-1279.
• OECD (2004), Patents and Innovation: Trends and challenges, Paris: OECD.
• OECD (2005), Oslo manual guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data, Paris: OECD.
• OECD (2009), Patent Statistics Manual, Paris: OECD.
• Oltra, Vanessa and Maider Saint Jean (2009), “Sectoral systems of environmental innovation: An application to the French automotive industry”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 76, No. 4, pp. 567-583.
• Pavitt, Keith (1984), “Sectoral patterns of technological change. Towards a taxonomy and a theory”, Research Policy, Vol. 13, No. 6, pp. 343-373.
• Scherer, Michael (1982), “Interindustry technology flows in the United States”, Research Policy, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 227-245.
• Verspagen, Bart (2005), “Mapping Technological Trajectories as Patent Citation Networks. A Study on the History of Fuel Cell Research” UNI-MERIT Working Paper 2005-020, Holland: UNI-MERIT.