BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Economics of Carbon Dioxide Sequestration and Mitigation versus a Suite of Alternative Renewable Energy Sources for Electricity Generation in U.S.

Yıl 2011, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 4, 78 - 94, 01.12.2011

Öz

An equilibrium economic model for policy evaluation related to electricity generation in U.S has been developed; the model takes into account the non-renewable and renewable energy sources, demand and supply factors and environmental constraints. The non-renewable energy sources include three types of fossil fuels: coal, natural gas and petroleum, and renewable energy sources include nuclear, hydraulic, wind, solar photovoltaic, biomass wood, biomass waste and geothermal. Energy demand sectors include households, industrial manufacturing and non-manufacturing commercial enterprises. Energy supply takes into account the electricity delivered to the consumer by the utility companies at a certain price which maybe different for retail and wholesale customers. Environmental risks primarily take into account the CO2 generation from fossil fuels. The model takes into account the employment in various sectors and labor supply and demand. Detailed electricity supply and demand data, electricity cost data, employment data in various sectors and CO2 generation data are collected for a period of nineteen years from 1990 to 2009 in U.S. The model is employed for policy analysis experiments if a switch is made in sources of electricity generation, namely from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources. As an example, we consider a switch of 10% of electricity generation from coal to 5% from wind, 3% from solar photovoltaic, 1% from biomass wood and 1% from biomass waste. The model is also applied to a switch from 10% coal to 10% from clean coal technologies. It should be noted that the cost of electricity generation from different sources is different and is taken into account. The consequences of this switch on supply and demand, employment, wages, and emissions are obtained from the economic model under three scenarios: (1) energy prices are fully regulated, (2) energy prices are fully adjusted with electricity supply fixed, and (3) energy prices and electricity supply both are fully adjusted.

Yıl 2011, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 4, 78 - 94, 01.12.2011

Öz

Toplam 0 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Diğer ID JA59GZ53FV
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Ramesh Agarwal Bu kişi benim

Lee Chusak Bu kişi benim

Zheming Zhang Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Aralık 2011
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2011 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA Agarwal, R., Chusak, L., & Zhang, Z. (2011). Economics of Carbon Dioxide Sequestration and Mitigation versus a Suite of Alternative Renewable Energy Sources for Electricity Generation in U.S. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 1(4), 78-94.
AMA Agarwal R, Chusak L, Zhang Z. Economics of Carbon Dioxide Sequestration and Mitigation versus a Suite of Alternative Renewable Energy Sources for Electricity Generation in U.S. IJEEP. Aralık 2011;1(4):78-94.
Chicago Agarwal, Ramesh, Lee Chusak, ve Zheming Zhang. “S”. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 1, sy. 4 (Aralık 2011): 78-94.
EndNote Agarwal R, Chusak L, Zhang Z (01 Aralık 2011) Economics of Carbon Dioxide Sequestration and Mitigation versus a Suite of Alternative Renewable Energy Sources for Electricity Generation in U.S. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 1 4 78–94.
IEEE R. Agarwal, L. Chusak, ve Z. Zhang, “S”., IJEEP, c. 1, sy. 4, ss. 78–94, 2011.
ISNAD Agarwal, Ramesh vd. “S”. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 1/4 (Aralık 2011), 78-94.
JAMA Agarwal R, Chusak L, Zhang Z. Economics of Carbon Dioxide Sequestration and Mitigation versus a Suite of Alternative Renewable Energy Sources for Electricity Generation in U.S. IJEEP. 2011;1:78–94.
MLA Agarwal, Ramesh vd. “S”. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, c. 1, sy. 4, 2011, ss. 78-94.
Vancouver Agarwal R, Chusak L, Zhang Z. Economics of Carbon Dioxide Sequestration and Mitigation versus a Suite of Alternative Renewable Energy Sources for Electricity Generation in U.S. IJEEP. 2011;1(4):78-94.