FACTORS DETERMINING TAXPAYERS’ PERCEPTION TOWARDS TAX FAIRNESS: THE STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODEL FOR TURKEY

Abstract

Tax noncompliance is a significant problem that should be researched given changing tax views of taxes. Tax compliance is a complex issue and can be explained by both economic and social factors. Perceptions of fairness have played an important role in taxpayers’ voluntary tax compliance. This exploratory study investigated the relationship between tax compliance and fairness from the point of view of taxpayers’ perception of tax fairness and the factors determining tax fairness. Using survey data collected from 481 taxpayers, this relationship was found using a structural equation model with Turkey as the sample country. We found that perceived fairness in the tax system depends on the structure of the tax system, interaction with the tax administration, inefficiency in the tax system, tax morale and the using of public expenditures

Keywords

• Tax compliance, tax fairness, taxpayers’ perceptions, tax knowledge, structural equation model

Kaynakça

1. Alm, J., B.R. Jackson& M. Mckee (March, 1992), “Estimating the Determinants of Taxpayer Compliance with Experimental Data”, National Tax Journal, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp.107-114.
2. Alm, J., T. Cherry, M. Jones, M. Mckee (2010), “Taxpayer Information
3. Assistance Services and Tax Compliance Behavior”, Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 31, pp. 577-586. Allingham, M.G. & A. Sandmo (1972), “Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical
4. Analysis”, Journal of Public Economics, Vol.1, pp.323-338. Andreoni J., Erard B. Feinstein Js (1998), “Tax Compliance”, Journal of
5. Economic Literature, Vol. 36, No.2, pp.818–860. Ayres, I. & J. Braithwaite (1992), Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate, New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Bazart, C., A. Bonein (2014), “Reciprocal Relationship in Tax Compliance
7. Decisions”, Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 40, pp.83-102. Beron, Kurt,. Helen V. Tauchen, Ann Dryden Witte (1998), A Structural Equation
8. Model for Tax Compliance and Auditing, Nber Working Paper Series, Cambridge: Bobek, D.D., R. W. Roberts & J.T. Sweeney (2007), “The Social Norm of Tax

9. Compliance: Evidence from Australia, Singapore, and the United States”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 74, No.1, pp.49-64. Calvet, R. & J. Alm (2013), Empathy, Sympathy, and Tax Compliance, Working Paper, 1310.
10. Clotfelter, C. T. (August, 1983) “Tax Evasion and Tax Rates: An Analysis of
11. Individual Returns”, Review Economic Statistics, Vol. 65, No.3, pp.363-373. Cornelissen, T., O. Himmler, T. Koenig (2013), “Fairness Spillovers—the Case of
12. Taxation”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 90, pp.164–180. Cummings, R.G., J. Martinez-Vazquez, M. McKee & B. Torgler (2009), “Tax
13. Morale Affects Tax Compliance: Evidence from Surveys and an Artefactual Field Experiment”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol.70, pp.447– Davis, J. S., G. Hecht & J. D. Perkins (January, 2003), “Social Behaviors,
14. Enforcement, and Tax Compliance Dynamics”, The Accounting Review, Vol.78, No.1, pp.39-69. Devos, Ken (2008), “Tax Evasion Behaviour and Demographic Factors: An
15. Exploratory Study in Australia”, Revenue Law Journal, Vol.18, No.1, pp.1-45. Doyle, E., K. Gallery & M. Coyle (April, 2009), “Procedural Justice Principles and Tax Compliance in Ireland: A Preliminary Exploration in the Context of
16. Reminder Letters”, Journal of Finance and Management in Public Services, Vol. , No.1, pp.49-62. Fehr, E. & K. M. Schmidt (2005), The Economics of Fairness, Reciprocity and Altruism -Experimental Evidence and New Theories, Munich Discussion Paper, No. 2005-20.
17. Feld, L. & B. Frey (2005), Tax Compliance as the Result of A Psychological Tax
18. Contract: The Role of Incentives and Responsive Regulation, Working Paper, No , Canberra: Feld, L. & B. Frey (2010), “Tax Evasion and Psychological Tax Contract”, (in
19. Alm; J. Martinez-Vazquez and B. Torgler –Ed., Developing Alternative Frameworks for Explaining Tax Compliance), Routledge, London and New York: pp.74-94. Graetz, M. J.,J.F., Reinganum & L.L.,Wilde (1986). “The Tax Compliance Game:
20. Toward An Interactive Theory of Law Enforcement”, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, Vol.2, pp.1–32. Hartner, M., S. Rechberger, E. Kirchler & A. Schabmann (March, 2008),
21. “Procedural Fairness and Tax Compliance”, Economic Analysis Policy, Vol. 38, No.1, pp.137–152. James, S. & C. Alley (2000), “Tax Compliance, Self-Assessment and Tax
22. Administration”, Journal of Finance and Management in Public Services, Vol. 2, No.2, pp.27-42. Kirchler, E., A. Niemirowski, A.Wearing (2006), “Shared Subjective Views,
23. Intent to Cooperate and Tax Compliance: Similarities between Australian Taxpayers and Tax Officers”, Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 27, pp.502- Kirchler, E., E. Hoezl & I. Wahl (2008), “Enforced versus Voluntary Tax
24. Compliance: The “Slippery Slope”, Framework”, Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 29, pp.210-225. Kirchler, E. & I. Wahl (2010), “Tax compliance inventory TAX-I: Designing an
25. Inventory for Surveys of Tax Compliance”, Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 31, pp.331–346. Leviner, S. (2008), “An Overview: A new Area of Tax Enforcement–from ‘‘Big
26. Stick’’ to Responsive Regulation”, Regulation & Governance, Vol.2, pp.360–380. Loo, E. C., M. McKerchar, & A. Hansford, (2009). “Understanding the compliance behavior of Malaysian individual taxpayers using a mixed method approach”, Journal of the Australasian Tax Teachers Association, Vol.4, No.1, pp.181–202.
27. Morris, Donald (2012), Tax Cheating, New York: State University of New York Press.
28. Murphy, K. (April, 2004), “The Role of Trust in Nurturing Compliance: A Study of Accused Tax Avoiders”, Law and Human Behavior, Vol. 28, No.2, pp.187
29. Murphy, K. (2005), Regulating More Effectively: The Relationship between
30. Procedural Justice, Legitimacy and Tax Non-Compliance, Working Paper, No 71. Oberholzer, R., E.M. Stack (2014), “Review possible Reasons for Tax Resistance in South Africa: A Customised Scale to Measure and Compare perceptions with
31. Previous Research”, Public Relations Review, Vol. 40, pp.251–266. OECD (2012), Reducing Opportunities for Tax Non-Compliance in the Underground
32. Economy. Forum on Tax Administration: SME Compliance Sub-Group. Polinsky, A.M. & S. Shavell, (March, 2000), “The Economics Theory of Public
33. Enforcement of Law”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 38, No.1, pp.45-76. Posner, E. A. (November, 2000), “Law and Social Norms: The Case of Tax
34. Compliance”, Virginia Law Review, Vol. 86, No.8, pp.1781-1819.
35. Riahi-Belkaoui, A. (2004), “Relationship between Tax Compliance
36. Internationally and Selected Determinants of Tax Morale”, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Vol. 13, pp.135–143. Saad, N. (2014), “Tax Knowledge, Tax Complexity and Tax Compliance:
37. Taxpayers’ View”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 109, pp.1069-1075.
38. Savage, D.A. & B. Torgler (September, 2010), “Perceptions of Fairness and Allocation Systems”, Economic Analysis & Policy, Vol.40, No. 2, pp.229-248.
39. Schaltegger, C. A. (2007), “Tax Amnesties and Political Participation”, ”, (in:
40. Benno Torgler -Ed., Tax Compliance and Tax Morale A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis), Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp.264-295. Thomas, C. (2012), Assessing Tax Fairness Dimensions in a Small Developing
41. Economy, Business and Economics Journal, Vol.1, pp.1-9. Torgler, B. (2007), Tax Compliance and Tax Morale A Theoretical and Empirical
42. Analysis, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. Tyler, T. R. (1997). The Psychology of Legitimacy: A Relational Perspective on
43. Voluntary Deference to Authorities, Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol.1, 323-345. Wenzel, M. (2002), “The Impact of Outcome Orientation and Justice Concerns on
44. Tax Compliance: The Role of Taxpayers’ Identity”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.87, pp.629-645. Wenzel, M. (2004), “An analysis of norm processes in tax compliance”, Journal of Economic Psychology, Vo.25, pp.213–228.