MONETARY TRANSMISSION MECHANISM IN TURKEY AND ARGENTINA

Öz

Monetary transmission mechanism, which is used by central banks to affect consumption, investment and saving decisions of both households and firms, has been subject of many theoretical and empirical studies. It seems that there is a consensus that monetary policy affects real economy in the short run. But on the other hand, the question “how it actually does” has been discussed by many economists for several years. The reason for this is that the countries which are at different stages of development also have financial systems at different levels. While in industrialized countries, the capital market system is more effective in the financial system; in developing countries, banking system is dominant in the financial system. From this viewpoint, this study tries to answer the question “which of the two channels of transmission mechanisms is effective in the two developing countries, Argentina and Turkey, “money channel or credit channel (which is not alternative but complementary for money channel)”. VAR model is used to identify relative strengths of different monetary transmission channels in each country by five macroeconomic variables which are stated in the following order: overnight rate, bank deposits, bank loans, consumer price index and industrial production index. The data period of these variables ranges from 2003:01 to 2010:08. The paper proceeds as follows: Section I provides theoretical background of the money and credit channels of transmission mechanism. Section II summarizes recent empirical studies. Section III describes variables and discusses the empirical findings of the model. Section IV provides concluding remarks

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Monetary Transmission Mechanism, Turkey, Argentina, VAR

Kaynakça

1. Ando, Albert and Franco Modiagliani (1963), “The Life Cycle Hypothesis of
2. Saving: Aggregate Implications and Tests”, American Economic Review, Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 55-84. Bernanke, Ben and Alan S. Blinder (1988), “Credit Money and Aggregate
3. Demand”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 78, No. 2, pp. 435–439. Bernanke, Ben S. (1993), “Credit in the Macroeconomy”, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Quarterly Review, Vol. 18, Issue 1, pp. 50-70.
4. Bernanke, Ben S. and Mark Gertler (1995), “Inside the Black Box: The Credit
5. Channel of Monetary Policy Transmission”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 27-48. Cambazoğlu, Birgül (2010), Parasal Aktarım Mekanizması Kredi Kanalı: Kuram ve Türkiye Örneği, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Adnan Menderes
6. University Institute of Social Sciences, Aydın, Turkey. Çavuşoğlu, Tarkan (2002), “Credit Transmission Mechanism in Turkey: An
7. Emprical Investigation”, Middle East Technical University ERC Working Papers in Economics, Vol.02/03, pp. 1-30. Cengiz, Vedat and Mehmet Duman (2008), “Türkiye’de Banka Kredi Kanalının
8. Önemi Üzerine Etki Tepki Fonksiyonlarına Dayalı Bir Değerlendirme (1990- )”, Hacettepe Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F Dergisi, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 81-104.

9. Çiçek, Macide (2005), “Türkiye’de Parasal Aktarım Mekanizması: VAR (vektör Otoregresyon) Yaklaşımıyla Analizi”, İktisat İşletme ve Finans Dergisi, Vol. 20, No. 233, pp. 82-105.
10. Fuinhas, J.Alberto (2008), "Monetary Transmission and Bank Lending in
11. Portugal: A Sectoral Approach”, The IUP Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. VI, Iss. 1, pp. 34-60. Gertler, Mark and Simon Gilchrist (1994), “Monetary Policy, Business Cycles, and the Behaviour of Small Manufacturing Firms”, The Quarterly Journal of
12. Economics, Vol. 109, No. 2, pp. 309-340. Gomez-Gonzales, J. and F. Grosz (2007), “Evidence of Bank Lending Channel for Argentina and Colombia”, Cuadernos de Economia, Vol.44, pp. 109-126.
13. Gündüz, Lokman (2001), "Türkiye’de Parasal Aktarım Mekanizması ve Banka
14. Kredi Kanalı”, İMKB Journal, Iss. 5, Vol. 18, pp. 13-30. Hubbard, Glenn. R (1994), “Is There a Credit Channel for Monetary
15. Policy?”,NBER Working Paper, pp. 1-45  http://ww2.publicbank.com.my/cnt_review37.html (download: 9/12/2002).
16. İnan, Emre Alpan (2001), “Parasal Aktarım Mekanizmasının Kredi Kanalı ve Türkiye”, Bankacılar Dergisi, No. 39, pp. 3-19.
17. Mishkin, S. Frederic. (1995) “Symposium on the Monetary Transmission
18. Mechanism”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol.9 No.4, pp. 3-10. Özdoğan, Z. (2009) Monetary Transmission Mechanism in Turkey, Unpublished
19. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Delaware, Newark USA. OECD, Türkiye’deki Küçük ve Orta Ölçekli İşletmeler Mevcut Durum ve Politikalar, ). Şengönül, Ahmet and Willem Thorbecke (2005), “The Effect of Monetary Policy on Bank Lending in Turkey”, Applied Financial Economics, Vol. 15, Iss. 13, pp. 934.
20. Suzuki, Tomoya (2004), “Is the Lending Channel of Monetary Policy Dominant in Australia?”, The Economic Record, Vol. 80, Iss. 249, pp. 145-156.
21. Taylor, B. J. (1995), “Monetary Transmission Mechanism: An Empirical
22. Framework”, Journal of Economic Perspective, 9(4), pp. 11-26. Tobin, James (1969) “A General Equilibrium Approach to Monetary Theory”,
23. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 15-29.