EN
PERFORMANCE OF PORTFOLIO INSURANCE STRATEGIES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY
Öz
In this study, we compare the performances of the two standard portfolio insurance methods: the
Option Based Portfolio Insurance (OBPI) and the Constant Proportion Portfolio Insurance (CPPI).
In prior works, data on many established markets were utilised to investigate this issue. There have
also been many empirical studies of portfolio insurance (PI) utilising emerging market data.
However, we are not aware of an application PI on Turkish data. This is where our study
contributes to PI literature. We use a data set that covers the Istanbul Stock Exchange 30 (ISE-30)
stocks, from 1.3.1997 to 29.8.2008. Our main finding is that the implementation of PI (especially
CPPI) enhances portfolio performance.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Annaert, J., Osselaer, S. V., & Verstraete, B. (2009). “Performance evaluation of portfolio insurance strategies using stochastic dominance criteria”. Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol.33(2), pp.272−280
- Bertrand, P., & Prigent, J. L. (2005), “Portfolio insurance strategies: OBPI versus CPPI”, Finance, Vol. 26(1), pp.5−32.
- Black. F and Jones,R, (1987), “Simplifying portfolio insurance”, Journal of Portfolio
- Management Vol.14, No.1 , pp. 48–51. Black, F. and Rouhani, R. (1989). “Constant proportion portfolio insurance and the synthetic put option: a comparison”, in Institutional Investor Focus on Investment Management, edited by Frank
- J. Fabozzi. Cambridge, Mass: Ballinger, pp.695–708. Black, F. and Perold, A.F. (1992), “Theory of constant proportion portfolio insurance”, Journal of
- Economic Dynamics and Control Vol.16, pp. 403–426. Black, F. and Scholes, M. S. (1973). “The pricing of options and corporate liabilities.” Journal of
- Political Economy, Vol.81, pp.637 –654. Bookstaber, R. and Langsam, J. A. (2000). “Portfolio insurance trading rules”,The Journal of
- Futures Markets, Vol.8, pp.15–31. Do, B.H. (2002), “Relative performance of dynamic portfolio insurance strategies: Australian evidence”, Accounting & Finance, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 279-296.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
-
Bölüm
-
Yayımlanma Tarihi
1 Aralık 2009
Gönderilme Tarihi
1 Aralık 2009
Kabul Tarihi
-
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2009 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2
APA
Er, H., & Erdogan Aktan, H. (2009). PERFORMANCE OF PORTFOLIO INSURANCE STRATEGIES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies, 1(2), 35-44. https://izlik.org/JA63WU34FU
AMA
1.Er H, Erdogan Aktan H. PERFORMANCE OF PORTFOLIO INSURANCE STRATEGIES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY. IJEFS. 2009;1(2):35-44. https://izlik.org/JA63WU34FU
Chicago
Er, Hakan, ve Hande Erdogan Aktan. 2009. “PERFORMANCE OF PORTFOLIO INSURANCE STRATEGIES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY”. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies 1 (2): 35-44. https://izlik.org/JA63WU34FU.
EndNote
Er H, Erdogan Aktan H (01 Aralık 2009) PERFORMANCE OF PORTFOLIO INSURANCE STRATEGIES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies 1 2 35–44.
IEEE
[1]H. Er ve H. Erdogan Aktan, “PERFORMANCE OF PORTFOLIO INSURANCE STRATEGIES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY”, IJEFS, c. 1, sy 2, ss. 35–44, Ara. 2009, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA63WU34FU
ISNAD
Er, Hakan - Erdogan Aktan, Hande. “PERFORMANCE OF PORTFOLIO INSURANCE STRATEGIES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY”. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies 1/2 (01 Aralık 2009): 35-44. https://izlik.org/JA63WU34FU.
JAMA
1.Er H, Erdogan Aktan H. PERFORMANCE OF PORTFOLIO INSURANCE STRATEGIES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY. IJEFS. 2009;1:35–44.
MLA
Er, Hakan, ve Hande Erdogan Aktan. “PERFORMANCE OF PORTFOLIO INSURANCE STRATEGIES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY”. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies, c. 1, sy 2, Aralık 2009, ss. 35-44, https://izlik.org/JA63WU34FU.
Vancouver
1.Hakan Er, Hande Erdogan Aktan. PERFORMANCE OF PORTFOLIO INSURANCE STRATEGIES: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY. IJEFS [Internet]. 01 Aralık 2009;1(2):35-44. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA63WU34FU