BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

ECONOMIC GROWTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY IN TURKEY: ARE THEY OPPOSITE CONCEPTS?

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 85 - 95, 01.06.2013
https://izlik.org/JA75TT34AZ

Öz

The growing interest in global environmental issues whose importance has
been steadily increasing and the demand for environmental quality and their
mutual relation with economic growth are closely related. Economic growth,
while increasing the level of national income over time, brings with it concerns
about environmental quality. The purpose of this study is to examine the
relationship between Turkey's economic growth (Gross Domestic Income-GDP)
and environmental quality. In this study, the Environmental Kuznet Hypothesis,
which assumes a correlation between various indicators of environmental
degradation and per capita income in examining the relationship, will be used.
The Granger Causality Test and Cointegration Test methods will be used in
determining the relationship between the course of environmental degradation in
the first phase of economic growth and the degree of environmental effect in the
period between 1960 and 2011 (with annual data) in Turkey.

Kaynakça

  • Granger, Clive W. J. (1969), “Investigating Casual Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods”, Econometrica, , Vol.37, No:3, pp. 424-438
  • Grossman, Gene M. and Krueger, Alan B. (1991), “Environmental Impact of a North American Free Trade Agreement” , NBER Working Paper 3914: Cambridge.
  • Grossman, Gene M. and Krueger, Alan B. (1995), “Economic Growth and the Environment”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.110, No:2, pp.353-377.
  • Johansen, Soren, and Juselius, Katarina (1990) “Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration With Applications to the Demand for Money”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 52, No:2, pp. 169-210.
  • Kuznets, Simon, (1955), “Economic Growth and Income inequality”, American Economic Review, Vol. 45, No:1, pp. 1-28
  • Olusegun, AOmisakin (2009), “Economic Growth and Environmental Quality in Nigeria: Does Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis Hold”, Environmental Research Journal, Vol. 3, No:1, pp. 14-18.
  • Panayotou, Theodore (1993), “Empirical Tests and Policy Analysis of Environmental Degradation at Different Stages of Economic Development”, ILO Technology and Employment Programme Working Paper, WP238.
  • World Development Indicator (WDI) Database.

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 85 - 95, 01.06.2013
https://izlik.org/JA75TT34AZ

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Granger, Clive W. J. (1969), “Investigating Casual Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods”, Econometrica, , Vol.37, No:3, pp. 424-438
  • Grossman, Gene M. and Krueger, Alan B. (1991), “Environmental Impact of a North American Free Trade Agreement” , NBER Working Paper 3914: Cambridge.
  • Grossman, Gene M. and Krueger, Alan B. (1995), “Economic Growth and the Environment”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.110, No:2, pp.353-377.
  • Johansen, Soren, and Juselius, Katarina (1990) “Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration With Applications to the Demand for Money”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 52, No:2, pp. 169-210.
  • Kuznets, Simon, (1955), “Economic Growth and Income inequality”, American Economic Review, Vol. 45, No:1, pp. 1-28
  • Olusegun, AOmisakin (2009), “Economic Growth and Environmental Quality in Nigeria: Does Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis Hold”, Environmental Research Journal, Vol. 3, No:1, pp. 14-18.
  • Panayotou, Theodore (1993), “Empirical Tests and Policy Analysis of Environmental Degradation at Different Stages of Economic Development”, ILO Technology and Employment Programme Working Paper, WP238.
  • World Development Indicator (WDI) Database.
Toplam 8 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Diğer ID JA92BD92NH
Yazarlar

E.yasemin Bozdağlıoğlu Bu kişi benim

Mesut Çakır Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Haziran 2013
IZ https://izlik.org/JA75TT34AZ
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2013 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Bozdağlıoğlu, E., & Çakır, M. (2013). ECONOMIC GROWTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY IN TURKEY: ARE THEY OPPOSITE CONCEPTS? International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies, 5(1), 85-95. https://izlik.org/JA75TT34AZ
AMA 1.Bozdağlıoğlu E, Çakır M. ECONOMIC GROWTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY IN TURKEY: ARE THEY OPPOSITE CONCEPTS? IJEFS. 2013;5(1):85-95. https://izlik.org/JA75TT34AZ
Chicago Bozdağlıoğlu, E.yasemin, ve Mesut Çakır. 2013. “ECONOMIC GROWTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY IN TURKEY: ARE THEY OPPOSITE CONCEPTS?”. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies 5 (1): 85-95. https://izlik.org/JA75TT34AZ.
EndNote Bozdağlıoğlu E, Çakır M (01 Haziran 2013) ECONOMIC GROWTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY IN TURKEY: ARE THEY OPPOSITE CONCEPTS? International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies 5 1 85–95.
IEEE [1]E. Bozdağlıoğlu ve M. Çakır, “ECONOMIC GROWTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY IN TURKEY: ARE THEY OPPOSITE CONCEPTS?”, IJEFS, c. 5, sy 1, ss. 85–95, Haz. 2013, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA75TT34AZ
ISNAD Bozdağlıoğlu, E.yasemin - Çakır, Mesut. “ECONOMIC GROWTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY IN TURKEY: ARE THEY OPPOSITE CONCEPTS?”. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies 5/1 (01 Haziran 2013): 85-95. https://izlik.org/JA75TT34AZ.
JAMA 1.Bozdağlıoğlu E, Çakır M. ECONOMIC GROWTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY IN TURKEY: ARE THEY OPPOSITE CONCEPTS? IJEFS. 2013;5:85–95.
MLA Bozdağlıoğlu, E.yasemin, ve Mesut Çakır. “ECONOMIC GROWTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY IN TURKEY: ARE THEY OPPOSITE CONCEPTS?”. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies, c. 5, sy 1, Haziran 2013, ss. 85-95, https://izlik.org/JA75TT34AZ.
Vancouver 1.E.yasemin Bozdağlıoğlu, Mesut Çakır. ECONOMIC GROWTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY IN TURKEY: ARE THEY OPPOSITE CONCEPTS? IJEFS [Internet]. 01 Haziran 2013;5(1):85-9. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA75TT34AZ