BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

ECONOMIC GROWTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY IN TURKEY: ARE THEY OPPOSITE CONCEPTS?

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 85 - 95, 01.06.2013

Öz

The growing interest in global environmental issues whose importance has
been steadily increasing and the demand for environmental quality and their
mutual relation with economic growth are closely related. Economic growth,
while increasing the level of national income over time, brings with it concerns
about environmental quality. The purpose of this study is to examine the
relationship between Turkey's economic growth (Gross Domestic Income-GDP)
and environmental quality. In this study, the Environmental Kuznet Hypothesis,
which assumes a correlation between various indicators of environmental
degradation and per capita income in examining the relationship, will be used.
The Granger Causality Test and Cointegration Test methods will be used in
determining the relationship between the course of environmental degradation in
the first phase of economic growth and the degree of environmental effect in the
period between 1960 and 2011 (with annual data) in Turkey.

Kaynakça

  • Granger, Clive W. J. (1969), “Investigating Casual Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods”, Econometrica, , Vol.37, No:3, pp. 424-438
  • Grossman, Gene M. and Krueger, Alan B. (1991), “Environmental Impact of a North American Free Trade Agreement” , NBER Working Paper 3914: Cambridge.
  • Grossman, Gene M. and Krueger, Alan B. (1995), “Economic Growth and the Environment”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.110, No:2, pp.353-377.
  • Johansen, Soren, and Juselius, Katarina (1990) “Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration With Applications to the Demand for Money”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 52, No:2, pp. 169-210.
  • Kuznets, Simon, (1955), “Economic Growth and Income inequality”, American Economic Review, Vol. 45, No:1, pp. 1-28
  • Olusegun, AOmisakin (2009), “Economic Growth and Environmental Quality in Nigeria: Does Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis Hold”, Environmental Research Journal, Vol. 3, No:1, pp. 14-18.
  • Panayotou, Theodore (1993), “Empirical Tests and Policy Analysis of Environmental Degradation at Different Stages of Economic Development”, ILO Technology and Employment Programme Working Paper, WP238.
  • World Development Indicator (WDI) Database.
Yıl 2013, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 85 - 95, 01.06.2013

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Granger, Clive W. J. (1969), “Investigating Casual Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods”, Econometrica, , Vol.37, No:3, pp. 424-438
  • Grossman, Gene M. and Krueger, Alan B. (1991), “Environmental Impact of a North American Free Trade Agreement” , NBER Working Paper 3914: Cambridge.
  • Grossman, Gene M. and Krueger, Alan B. (1995), “Economic Growth and the Environment”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.110, No:2, pp.353-377.
  • Johansen, Soren, and Juselius, Katarina (1990) “Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration With Applications to the Demand for Money”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 52, No:2, pp. 169-210.
  • Kuznets, Simon, (1955), “Economic Growth and Income inequality”, American Economic Review, Vol. 45, No:1, pp. 1-28
  • Olusegun, AOmisakin (2009), “Economic Growth and Environmental Quality in Nigeria: Does Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis Hold”, Environmental Research Journal, Vol. 3, No:1, pp. 14-18.
  • Panayotou, Theodore (1993), “Empirical Tests and Policy Analysis of Environmental Degradation at Different Stages of Economic Development”, ILO Technology and Employment Programme Working Paper, WP238.
  • World Development Indicator (WDI) Database.
Toplam 8 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Diğer ID JA92BD92NH
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

E.yasemin Bozdağlıoğlu Bu kişi benim

Mesut Çakır Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Haziran 2013
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2013 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Bozdağlıoğlu, E., & Çakır, M. (2013). ECONOMIC GROWTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY IN TURKEY: ARE THEY OPPOSITE CONCEPTS?. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies, 5(1), 85-95.
AMA Bozdağlıoğlu E, Çakır M. ECONOMIC GROWTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY IN TURKEY: ARE THEY OPPOSITE CONCEPTS?. IJEFS. Haziran 2013;5(1):85-95.
Chicago Bozdağlıoğlu, E.yasemin, ve Mesut Çakır. “ECONOMIC GROWTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY IN TURKEY: ARE THEY OPPOSITE CONCEPTS?”. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies 5, sy. 1 (Haziran 2013): 85-95.
EndNote Bozdağlıoğlu E, Çakır M (01 Haziran 2013) ECONOMIC GROWTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY IN TURKEY: ARE THEY OPPOSITE CONCEPTS?. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies 5 1 85–95.
IEEE E. Bozdağlıoğlu ve M. Çakır, “ECONOMIC GROWTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY IN TURKEY: ARE THEY OPPOSITE CONCEPTS?”, IJEFS, c. 5, sy. 1, ss. 85–95, 2013.
ISNAD Bozdağlıoğlu, E.yasemin - Çakır, Mesut. “ECONOMIC GROWTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY IN TURKEY: ARE THEY OPPOSITE CONCEPTS?”. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies 5/1 (Haziran 2013), 85-95.
JAMA Bozdağlıoğlu E, Çakır M. ECONOMIC GROWTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY IN TURKEY: ARE THEY OPPOSITE CONCEPTS?. IJEFS. 2013;5:85–95.
MLA Bozdağlıoğlu, E.yasemin ve Mesut Çakır. “ECONOMIC GROWTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY IN TURKEY: ARE THEY OPPOSITE CONCEPTS?”. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies, c. 5, sy. 1, 2013, ss. 85-95.
Vancouver Bozdağlıoğlu E, Çakır M. ECONOMIC GROWTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY IN TURKEY: ARE THEY OPPOSITE CONCEPTS?. IJEFS. 2013;5(1):85-9.