COMPARISON OF REAL AND COMPLEX-VALUED VERSIONS OF WAVELET TRANSFORM, CURVELET TRANSFORM AND RIDGELET TRANSFORM FOR MEDICAL IMAGE DENOISING

Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1 1 Haziran 2013
  • Huseyin Yasar
  • Murat Ceylan
  • Ayse Elif Ozturk
PDF İndir
EN

COMPARISON OF REAL AND COMPLEX-VALUED VERSIONS OF WAVELET TRANSFORM, CURVELET TRANSFORM AND RIDGELET TRANSFORM FOR MEDICAL IMAGE DENOISING

Abstract

In this study; medical images were denoising with multiresolution analyses using real-valued wavelet transform (RVWT), complex-valued wavelet transform (CVWT), ridgelet transform (RT), real-valued first-generation curvelet transform (RVFG CT), real-valued second-generation curvelet transform (RVSG CT), complex-valued second-generation curvelet transform (CVSG CT) and results are compared. First and second-generation curvelet transformations are used for real- valued curvelet transform as two techniques. For the evaluation of the proposed system, we used 32 lung CT images. These images include 10 images with benign nodules and 22 images with malign nodules. Different types of noise like the Random noise, Gaussian noise and Salt & Pepper noise were added to these images and they are removed separately. The performances of used transforms are compared using Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR) parameter. Obtained results showed that complex-valued wavelet transform are suited for removal of random noise and Gaussian noise. In case of Gaussian noise in images, PSNRs of first generation curvelet transform and complex-valued wavelet transform are around 33 dB. The ridgelet transform provides high PSNR value (30.4dB) for denoising of salt & pepper noise in images.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Morlet J., Arehs G., Forugeau I., Giard D., “Wave Propagation and Sampling Theory”, Geophysics, vol. 47, pp. 203-236, 1982.
  2. Morlet J., Arehs G., “Decompsotition Of Hardy Functions into Square Integrable Wavelets of Constant Shape”, SIAM J. Math. Anal., vol. 15, no. 4, p.p. 723-736, 1984.
  3. Chuı C. K., Wu S., “An Introduction to Wavelets”, Academic Press, 1992. [4]
  4. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics 37 , 1993.
  5. Mallat S., “A Theory For Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: The Wavelet Representation”, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., vol. 11, p.p. 674–693, 1989.
  6. Daubechies I., “Ten Lectures on Wavelets”, PA: SIAM , Philadelphia, 1992.
  7. Coifman R. R., Wickerhauser M. V., “Entropy Based Algorithms For Best Basis Selection”, IEEE Trans. On Information Theory, vol. 38, no. 2, 1992. [8] Lawton W., “Applications of Complex Valued Wavelet Transforms to Subband Decomposition”, IEEE Trans. Sig. Proc., vol. 41, no. 12, p.p. 3566- 3568,1993.
  8. Lina J. M., “Complex Daubechies Wavelets: Filter Design and Applications”, Proc.ISAAC Conf., University of Delaware,1997.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

-

Yazarlar

Huseyin Yasar Bu kişi benim

Murat Ceylan Bu kişi benim

Ayse Elif Ozturk Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi

1 Haziran 2013

Gönderilme Tarihi

1 Haziran 2013

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2013 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Yasar, H., Ceylan, M., & Ozturk, A. E. (2013). COMPARISON OF REAL AND COMPLEX-VALUED VERSIONS OF WAVELET TRANSFORM, CURVELET TRANSFORM AND RIDGELET TRANSFORM FOR MEDICAL IMAGE DENOISING. International Journal of Electronics Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, 3(1), 427-436. https://izlik.org/JA28ET47LX