ANALYSIS OF FACTORS IMPACTING LAND USE IN TRANSFORMING ISTANBUL HISTORICAL CITY CENTER

Abstract

Istanbul historical city center is going through a provincial transformation by quick population increase, multi- centered city development, developing tourism and trade feature pressures as well as selection of location for housing. Provincial transformation is briefly described as; an action plan integrating with the city and urban people, prepared to increase life quality based on strategic development plan and within the provincial development vision for the nonfunctional, old and worn provincial pieces unable to fulfill physical, social and economic development dynamics and new requirements. Objective of this study is to find out factors affecting provincial transformation that are observed in research district and positive negative effect ratios based on regression analysis. Research district Sultanahmet and surrounding area located between Divan Yolu Street and Topkapı Palace and Marmara Sea, which is considered among UNESCO Global Heritage Areas, having intensive cultural assets, transforming pursuant to tourism and trade feature pressure, preserving most of its authentic housing texture, worn out as well as observed to be a qualified housing location choice of people with high socio-economic and educational class. It is concluded that the urban transformation resulting from the dynamism in the historical, physical and socioeconomically structure of the space in the research area is weighted with the accommodation and commercial place selections, there are influences of the culture asset structure, some part of the functions being in the place selection and the positive and negative reflections of the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of the focal points on the transformation which is followed on the area and also the land-plot unit price value directs the selections in part

Keywords

• Transformation, İstanbul old CBD, land use, regression analysis

Kaynakça

1. (/Yenileş(tir)me): Türkiye’deki Beklentiler. 2-10. Akkar, Z. M., 2006. Kentsel Dönüşüm Üzerine
2. Batı’daki Kavramlar, Tanımlar, Süreçler ve Türkiye, Planlama 36, 29-37. Galantay, E.Y., 1975. New Towns: Antiquity to the Present, New York: G. Braziller.
3. Taylor, B. , R.Y.-W. Kwok, 1989. From export center transformation of Hong Kong, Journal of the American Planning Association 55, 3, 309-322.
4. Fujita, K., 1991. A world city and flexible specialization:
5. Metropolis, International Journal of Urban and Regional Planning 15, 2, 269-284. Dokmeci, V., Berkoz, L., 1994. Transformation of Istanbul from a monocentric to a polycentric city, European Planning Studies, 2, 2, 193-205.
6. Ergun, N., 2004. Gentrification of Istanbul, Cities, 21, 5, 391-405.
7. Dökmeci, V. and Berkoz, L., 2000. Residential- location preferences according to demographic characteristics in Istanbul, Landscape and Urban Planning 48, 1-2, 45-55.
8. Carmon, N., 1997. Neighborhood regeneration:

9. The state of the art, Journal of Planning Education and Research 17, 2, 131-144. Gunay, Z., Dokmeci, V., 2012. Cultural-led regeneration of Istanbul waterfront: Golden Horn
10. Cultural Valley Project, Cities 29, 4, 213-232. Criekingen, M.V., Decroly, J.M., 2003. Revisiting
11. Neighborhood renewal processes in Brussels and Montreal, Urban Studies 40, 12, 2451-2468.
12. Fang, K., Zhang, Y., 2003. Plan and market mismatch: Urban redevelopment in Beijing during a period of transition, Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 44, 2, 162.
13. Ozus, E., Dokmeci, V., 2005. Effects of revitalization in historical city center of Istanbul,
14. International Real Estate Review 8, 1, 144-159. Atkinson, R., 2000. Measuring gentrification and displacement in Greater London, Studies, 37, 1, 149-165.
15. Milanovich, N.P., 2001. Urban Housing Markets convergence, Divergence or Policy “Collapse”,
16. European Journal of Housing Policy, 1, 2, 145-187. Uzun, C.N., 2003. Gentrification on in
17. İstanbul: a diagnostic study, University of Utrecth, Utrecth. Levine, M.A., 2004. Government policy, the state, and gentrification: The case of Prenzlauer
18. Berg Berlin, Germany, Journal of Urban Affairs, , 1, 89-108. Deneyimi ve to world city: Planning for the Restructuring of the Tokyo the diversity of gentrification: Urban in Central and Eastern Europe: Kocabas, A., 2006. Türkiye’de Ortaya
19. Çıkmakta Olan Kentsel Yenileştirme Uygulamaları: 2006, Kentsel Dönüşüm (/Yenileş(tir)me):
20. İngiltere Deneyimi ve Türkiye’deki Beklentiler. 2- 107. Ergun, N., Dundar B., 2004 Functional Change as an İndicator of Transformation Near the Old City
21. Centre of İstanbul, European Planning Studies, Carfax Publishing, 12, 5, 723-738. Boutiques and City and Housing Policy Historic preservation in community