Location Based Scheduling In The Form Of Flow Line and Its Comparison to Cpm-Bar Chart Scheduling

Abstract

Time Management is a process of planning, scheduling and control over the amount of time spent in specific activities, especially to increase effectiveness, efficiency, or productivity. Bar charts and network diagrams like Critical Path Method (CPM) are used for medium to large size projects, while the line of balance technique is used for big linear projects and repetitive actions. Location based scheduling is a deviation of line of balance technique, which is graphical line showing the movement of crew’s productivity and continuity of two dimensional coordinate system using the location and time. A modified method has been evolved which uses Location Based Scheduling (LBS) in the form of flow line scheduling, which is a combination of CPM and Linear Scheduling Method (LSM) which can be used for planning and scheduling of small, medium and big projects.This study uses the modified LBS method for a case study of 3 floor villa which represents as a small project. Both scheduling tools, CPM/Bar chart and LBS, were used to schedule the villa and a comparison between the two methods with their limitations and advantages will be discussed. The results of the LBS scheduling through the case study showed that the LBS scheduling can work on small projects, can be easily planned, and it gave some advantageous results than the traditional CPM/Bar chart scheduling method.

Keywords

• Time Management, Line of Balance, Location Based Scheduling, Linear Scheduling Method

Kaynakça

1. Seppänen, O., & Aalto, E. “A Case Study of Line-of-Balance Based Schedule Planning and Control System,” IGLC 13. Sydney: IGLC, pp. 271-279, 2005. [2] Yamin, R. A., & Harmelink, D. J. “Comparison of Linear Scheduling Model (LSM) and Critical Path Method (CPM),” Journal of construction engineering and
2. Economics, pp. 353-364, 2002. [9] Jongeling, R., & Olofsson, T. “A Method for Planning of Work-Flow by Combined Use of Location-Based Scheduling and 4D CAD,” Automation in Constructiom, pp. 189-198, 2006.
3. Koo, B., & Fischer, M. “Feasibility Study of 4D CAD in Commercial Construction,” Construction Engineering and Management, pp. 251-260, 2000.
4. Harmelink, D. J. “Linear Scheduling Model: Float Characteristics,” Jouranl of Construction Engineering and Management, pp. 255-260, 2001.
5. Lu, M., & Li, H. “Resource-Activity Critical-Path Method for Construction Planning,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, pp. 412-420, 2003.
6. Galloway, P. D. “Survey of the Construction Industry Relative to the Use of CPM Scheduling for Construction Projects,” Journal of Construction Engineering and
7. Management, pp. 697-711, 2006.
8. Mendes, R., Fernando, L., & Heineck, M. “Preplanning Method for Multi- Story Building Construction Using Line of Balance,” IGLC, Guaruja, Brazil: Proceedings IGLC, pp. 1-9, 1998.

9. Vanhoucke, M. “Work Contiuity Constraints in Project Scheduling,” Journal of Consruction Engineering and Management, pp. 14-25, 2006.
10. Suhail, S. A., & Neale, R. H. “CPM/ LOB: New Methodology to Integrate CPM and Line of Balance,” Journal of Construction Engineering and
11. Management, pp. 667-684, 1994.
12. Björnfot, A., & Jongeling, R. “Application of Line-of Balance and 4D CAD for Lean Planning,” Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management, pp. 200-211, 2007.
13. Arditi, D., & Albulak, Z. “Line of Balance Scheduling in Pavement Construction,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Managament, pp. 411-424, 1986.
14. Harris, R. B., & Ioannou, P. G. “Scheduling Project with Repeating Activities,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, pp. 269-278, 1998.
15. Arditi, D., Tokdemir, O. B., & Suh, K. “Scheduling System for Repetitive Unit Construction Using Line- of-Balance Technology,” Engineering Construction and Architectural
16. Management, pp. 90-103, 2001.
17. Lowe, R. H., D’Onofrio, M. F., Fisk, D. M., & Seppänen, O. A Comparison of Location-Based Scheduling with the Traditional Critical Path Method. American College of Construction Lawyers, 2012.
18. Celikag, M., Qaymari, O., Manoucheri, P., Dzafic, H., & Sehwail, M. Building Information Modeling and Integration with off-site constrution. Famagusta: EMU, 2012.
19. Kazaz, A., & Ulubeyli, S. “A di erent approach to construction labour in Turkey: comparative productivity analysis,” Building and Enviroment, pp. 93-100, 2003.
20. Tutorials, V. (january 22). Fridays with Vico. Retrieved April 1, 2012, f rom youtube: http://www.youtube. com/user/FridaysWithVico/ videos?view=0, 2009.
21. Elbeltagi, E. (n.d.). Scheduling of Repetitve Projects. Retrieved may 05, 2013, from Elbeltagi Emad webpage: http://osp.mans.edu.eg/ elbeltagi/CB717%20Repetitive.pdf, 2013.