Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

MANEUVER SUPERIORITY WITH THE UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS: UNMANNED AIR MANEUVER AS A PRAGMATIC METHOD

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 22 - 38

Öz

Although the maneuver, center of gravity, and nonlinear warfare that left their mark on the twentieth century maintain their importance, the environment in which all these can be applied is getting more and more complex. On the other hand, as the lethality of the weapons increases, mass firing and movement, which are already costly, become more difficult, this situation complicates the classical maneuver approach based on hitting land targets. Both the lessons learned from the two world wars and the fact that the public has become less tolerant of war casualties in parallel with the increasing prosperity forces the commanders to think in more detail in their decisions and to choose the course of action that includes the minimum risk of casualties. On the other hand, the necessity of capturing the target in order to realize the purpose of the operation maintains its importance. This situation popularizes the idea of sacrificing unmanned systems instead of humans. Therefore, the complexity of today's wars and the fact that weapons become more deadly than before, also lead to a change in the character of the war. In this context, new ideas supported by high technology products are being developed in today's wars. Combatants are looking for ways to influence the battlefield from farther and safer areas. As the warrior moves away from the area of conflict, the emotional and logical interaction between him and his opponent is broken. The mechanized understanding of war also changes the character of the maneuver. This article presents a new maneuver superiority method that has emerged for land forces in today's complex operational environment and aims to explain the concept of unmanned air maneuver based on lessons learned from contemporary battles which Turkish Army involved.

Kaynakça

  • Barnhart, R.K., Marshall, D.M., and Shappee, E.J. (2021). Introduction to Unmanned Aircraft Systems. Third Edition. Abingdon, Oxon, UK: CRC Press.
  • Cardon, E.C. (Spring 2016). The Future of Army Maneuver–Dominance in the Land and Cyber Domains. The Cyber Defense Review. Vol. 1, No. 1. 15-20.
  • Chamayou, G. (2013). A Theory of The Drone. Trans. Janet Lloyd. London: The New Press.
  • Chandler, K. (2020). Unmanning: How Humans, Machines And Media Perform Drone Warfare. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press Encyclopædia Britannica (1962). Vol. 7.
  • Field Manual No. 100-5. (5 May 1986). Operations. Washington, DC: Headquarters, Department of the Army.
  • Field Manual No. 100-5. (June 1993). Operations. Washington, DC: Headquarters, Department of the Army.
  • Field Manual No. 3-0. (14 June 2001). Operations. Washington, DC: Headquarters, Department of the Army.
  • Field Manual No. 3-04. (06 April 2020). Army Aviation. Washington, DC: Headquarters, Department of the Army.
  • Field Manual No. 3-90-1 C2 (13 April 2015). Offense and Defense Volume 1. Washington, DC: Headquarters, Department of the Army.
  • Grossman, D. (1995). On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society. New York: Back Bay Books.
  • Hoffman, F.G. (2007). Conflict in the 21st Century: The Rise of Hybrid Wars. Virginia: Potomac Institute for Policy Studies.
  • Joint Publication No. 3-0 C1 (22 October 2018). Joint Operations. Washington, DC: Joint Chief of Staff.
  • Joint Publication No. 3-09 (10 April 2019). Joint Fire Support. Washington, DC: Joint Chief of Staff.
  • Kardeş, M.E. (Ekim 2018). Dijital Çağda Savaş: Dron Örneği [The War in the Digital Era: The Example of the Drone]. Etkileşim: Üsküdar Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Akademik Dergisi. 1 (2). 96-107.
  • Mack, A. (January 1975). Why Big Nations Lose Small Wars: The Politics of Asymmetric Conflict. World Politics. 175-200.
  • Martin, G. and Steuter, E. (2017). Drone Nation: The Political Economy of America’s New Way of War. New York: Lexington Books.
  • McMahan, J. (2009). Killing in War. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Metz, S. and Johnson II, D.V. (2001). Asymmetry and U.S. Military Strategy: Definition, Background, and Strategic Concepts. Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute.
  • Reynolds, G.S. (2012). The Emergence of Islam: Classical traditions in contemporary perspective. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
  • Sharre, P. (2018). Army of None: Autonomous Weapons and the Future of War. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

MANEUVER SUPERIORITY WITH THE UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS: UNMANNED AIR MANEUVER AS A PRAGMATIC METHOD

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 22 - 38

Öz

Although the maneuver, center of gravity, and nonlinear warfare that left their mark on the twentieth century maintain their importance, the environment in which all these can be applied is getting more and more complex. On the other hand, as the lethality of the weapons increases, mass firing and movement, which are already costly, become more difficult, this situation complicates the classical maneuver approach based on hitting land targets. Both the lessons learned from the two world wars and the fact that the public has become less tolerant of war casualties in parallel with the increasing prosperity forces the commanders to think in more detail in their decisions and to choose the course of action that includes the minimum risk of casualties. On the other hand, the necessity of capturing the target in order to realize the purpose of the operation maintains its importance. This situation popularizes the idea of sacrificing unmanned systems instead of humans. Therefore, the complexity of today's wars and the fact that weapons become more deadly than before, also lead to a change in the character of the war. In this context, new ideas supported by high technology products are being developed in today's wars. Combatants are looking for ways to influence the battlefield from farther and safer areas. As the warrior moves away from the area of conflict, the emotional and logical interaction between him and his opponent is broken. The mechanized understanding of war also changes the character of the maneuver. This article presents a new maneuver superiority method that has emerged for land forces in today's complex operational environment and aims to explain the concept of unmanned air maneuver based on lessons learned from contemporary battles which Turkish Army involved.

Kaynakça

  • Barnhart, R.K., Marshall, D.M., and Shappee, E.J. (2021). Introduction to Unmanned Aircraft Systems. Third Edition. Abingdon, Oxon, UK: CRC Press.
  • Cardon, E.C. (Spring 2016). The Future of Army Maneuver–Dominance in the Land and Cyber Domains. The Cyber Defense Review. Vol. 1, No. 1. 15-20.
  • Chamayou, G. (2013). A Theory of The Drone. Trans. Janet Lloyd. London: The New Press.
  • Chandler, K. (2020). Unmanning: How Humans, Machines And Media Perform Drone Warfare. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press Encyclopædia Britannica (1962). Vol. 7.
  • Field Manual No. 100-5. (5 May 1986). Operations. Washington, DC: Headquarters, Department of the Army.
  • Field Manual No. 100-5. (June 1993). Operations. Washington, DC: Headquarters, Department of the Army.
  • Field Manual No. 3-0. (14 June 2001). Operations. Washington, DC: Headquarters, Department of the Army.
  • Field Manual No. 3-04. (06 April 2020). Army Aviation. Washington, DC: Headquarters, Department of the Army.
  • Field Manual No. 3-90-1 C2 (13 April 2015). Offense and Defense Volume 1. Washington, DC: Headquarters, Department of the Army.
  • Grossman, D. (1995). On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society. New York: Back Bay Books.
  • Hoffman, F.G. (2007). Conflict in the 21st Century: The Rise of Hybrid Wars. Virginia: Potomac Institute for Policy Studies.
  • Joint Publication No. 3-0 C1 (22 October 2018). Joint Operations. Washington, DC: Joint Chief of Staff.
  • Joint Publication No. 3-09 (10 April 2019). Joint Fire Support. Washington, DC: Joint Chief of Staff.
  • Kardeş, M.E. (Ekim 2018). Dijital Çağda Savaş: Dron Örneği [The War in the Digital Era: The Example of the Drone]. Etkileşim: Üsküdar Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Akademik Dergisi. 1 (2). 96-107.
  • Mack, A. (January 1975). Why Big Nations Lose Small Wars: The Politics of Asymmetric Conflict. World Politics. 175-200.
  • Martin, G. and Steuter, E. (2017). Drone Nation: The Political Economy of America’s New Way of War. New York: Lexington Books.
  • McMahan, J. (2009). Killing in War. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Metz, S. and Johnson II, D.V. (2001). Asymmetry and U.S. Military Strategy: Definition, Background, and Strategic Concepts. Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute.
  • Reynolds, G.S. (2012). The Emergence of Islam: Classical traditions in contemporary perspective. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
  • Sharre, P. (2018). Army of None: Autonomous Weapons and the Future of War. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Toplam 20 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Yönetim Bilişim Sistemleri
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Özgür Körpe

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 8 Ekim 2024
Yayımlanma Tarihi
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Körpe, Ö. (2024). MANEUVER SUPERIORITY WITH THE UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS: UNMANNED AIR MANEUVER AS A PRAGMATIC METHOD. Uluslararası İktisadi Ve İdari Akademik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3(1), 22-38.