Teaching and Learning Method for Enhancing 15-16 Years Old Students`Knowledge as One Of Scientific Literacy Aspect in Chemistry: Results Based on Research and Approbation

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

Kaynakça

1. Van Aalsvoort, J. (2004). Activity theory as a tool to address the problem of chemistry’s lack of relevance in secondary school chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 26 (13), 1635-1651
2. Brown, B. A., Reveles J. M., Kelly, G. J. (2005). Scientific literacy and discursive identity: a theoretical framework for understanding science learning. Science Education, 89 (5), 779 - 802.
3. Bybee, J. (1997). Scientific literacy: a German perspective. Kiel, Germany: Institute for Science Education, 167-180.
4. DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: another look at its historical and contemporary meaning and its relationship ti science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37 (6), 582 – 601.
5. Fišers, R. (2005). Mācīsim bērniem domāt. Rīga: Raka, total 219 [in Latvian]
6. Holbrook, J., Rannikmäe, M. (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International journal of Science Education, 29 (11), 1347-1362.
7. Holman, J., Hunt A. (2002). What does it mean to be chemically literate? Education in Chemistry. 39,1,12-14.
8. Jong, O. (2006). Promoting Students` Interest in Science: New Roles and Strategies for Teachers. 5th IOSTE Eastern and Central Europien Symposium. Europe needs more Scientists. Tartu, 1-10.

9. Kelly, G. J. (2007). Scientific literacy, discourse, and knowledge. Proceedings of the Conference ”The LSL Meeting in Uppsala Symposium for the Linnaeus Tercentenary”. Retrieved November 23, 2009: http://www-conference.slu.se/lsymposium/speakers/KellyPO.pdf .
10. Mozeika, D., Cedere, D. (2008). Study on influence of students’ interest in natural sciences on the level of knowledge and understanding in chemistry. Proceedings of conference “ATEE Spring University 2008. Teacher of the 21st Century: Quality Education for Quality Teaching”, 258- 264. Riga: University of Latvia Press
11. Nentwig, P., Demuth, R., Parchmann, I., Ralle, B. (2007). Chemie im Kontext: Situating learning in relevant contexts while systematically developing basic chemical concepts. Journal of Chemical Education, 84 (9), 1439-1444.
12. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development OECD (2007). PISA 2006: Science Competencies for Tommorow`s World Executive Summary. Vol. 1, Analysis, 15-21. Retrieved August 22, 2009, from: http://www.pisa.oecd.org.
13. Rannikmäe, M., Holbrook, J. (2009). The meaning of Scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4 (3), 275-288.
14. Reveles, J. M., Codova, R., Kelly, G. J. (2004). Science literacy and academic identity formulation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1111 – 1144.
15. Roberts, D. (2007). Opening Remarks. Promoting Scientific Literacy: Science Education Research in Transaction. Proceedings of the Linnaeus Tercentenary Symposium. Uppsala University, Sweden, 9-18.
16. Ryder, J. (2001). Identifying science understanding for functional scientific literacy. Studies in Science Education, 36, 1-44.
17. Siemens, G. (2006). Knowing- knowledge. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Lulu Press. Retrieved October 27, 2009, from: www.knowingknowledges.com