The Effect Of Jigsaw-I Cooperative Learning Technique On Students’ Understanding About Basic Organic Chemistry Concepts

Öz

The purpose of this study was to investigate effect of Jigsaw-1 Cooperative Learning technique on students’ understanding and alternative conceptions concerning basic organic chemistry concepts. The study was conducted with a total of 52 9th grade students in a high school in Trabzon. The study used quasi-experimental design (an experimental group and a control group). While experimental group students performed activities based on Jigsaw 1 technique, control group students were taught with traditional approach. The treatment lasted for three lesson hours in both groups. An Organic Chemistry Achievement Test involving 5 open-ended questions was used to collect data. The data obtained from pre- and post-tests of both groups was compared with the independent t-test. The post-test results showed that there was a significant difference between groups in favor of the experimental group. In other words, the experimental group students taught with Jigsaw I technique performed better in the post-test than the control group.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

Kaynakça

1. Aydın, S. (2011). Effect of cooperative learning and traditional methods on students’ achievements and identifications of laboratory equipments in science-technology laboratory course, Educational Research and Reviews, 6(9), 636-644.
2. Bowen, C. W. (2000). A quantitative literature review of cooperative learning effects on high school and college chemistry achievement. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(2), 116–119.
3. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ:awrence Earlbaum Associates
4. Çalık, M., Ayas, A. & Coll, R.K. (2007). Enhancing pre-service primaryteachers’ conceptual understanding of solution chemistry with conceptual change text. International Journal of Science Mathematics Education, 5(1), 1-28.
5. Demircioğlu, G.. Özmen, H. and Ayas,A.(2004).Eğitim Bilimleri / Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice . 73-80
6. Doymuş, K., (2008). Teaching Chemical Equilibrium with the Jigsaw Technique. Research in Science Education, 38: 249-260
7. Doymuş, K., Karaçöp, A., and Şimşek, Ü.(2010).Effects of jigsaw and animation techniques on students’understanding of concepts and subjects in electrochemistry, Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 671-691
8. Ebenezer, J.V. & Erickson, L.G. (1996). Chemistry students’ conception of solubility: A phenomenograpy. Science Education, 80(2), 181-201.

9. Ghaith,G. And A.R. Bouzeineddine(2003).Relationship between reading attitudes, achievement and learners’ perceptions of their Jigsaw II Cooperative learning experiences,Reading Psychool,24(1):105-12 Haidar, A.H., & Abraham, M.R. (1991). A comparison of applied and theoretical knowledge of concepts based on the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 919–938
10. Haller, R.C ., Gallagher, V.J ., Weldon,T.L., Felder, R.M., 2000. Dynamics of peer interactions in cooperative learning. Journal Engineering Education, 89(3), 285-293
11. Johnson.,B.&Christensen,L.(2004) Educational Research,Quantitative,Qualitative and mixed Approaches, second edition,Pearson,U.S.A
12. Johnson, David W., Johnson, Roger T., and Smith, Karl A. (1991). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
13. Kozma, R.B., Chin, E., Russell, J., & Marx, N. (2000). The roles of representations and tools in the chemistry laboratory and their implications for chemistry instruction. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(2), 105 ± 1
14. Mattingly,R.M and R.L,Van Sickle (1991).Cooperative Learning and achievement in social studies:Jigsaw II.Social Psychol.,128(1):345-352
15. Pfundt, H., & Duit, R. (1991). Students’ alternative frameworks and science education ,Bibliography. Kiel, Germany : Institute for Science Education
16. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering c Education, 93(3), 223–231.
17. Robson, C.(1998) Real Word Research, Blackwell Publishers Ltd. Oxford, UK
18. Sharan, S. (2002). Differentiating methods of cooperative learning in research and practice. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 22(1), 106 – 116.
19. Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative learning. Review of Educational Research, 50(2), 315-342.
20. Staver, J.R. & Lumpe, A.T. (1995). Two investigations of students understanding of the mole concept and its use in problem solving. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(2),177-193.
21. Şahin, A. (2010). Effects of jigsaw II technique on academic achievement and attitudes to written expression course, Educational Research and Reviews, 5(12), 777-787