Comparative analysis of Kalina and ORC cycles in renewable energy systems: exergo-environmental assessment and cost calculations with carbon emissions

Abstract

This study aims to compare the thermal energy conversion performances of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) and Kalina systems. By comparing the performances of ORC and Kalina systems, it aims to provide an analysis on carbon emissions and economic costs. The highlighted results of the study indicate that for the ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle), the electrical power is 16.93 kW, with a heat transfer rate of 100 kW for heat exchanger-I. The ORC energy efficiency is 16.86%, with an exergy efficiency of 57.92%. The exergetic sustainability index is 1.34, with a carbon emission of 6.61 kgCO2 per hour and an economic value of electricity of $2.31 per hour. For the Kalina cycle, the electrical power is 11.60 kW, with a heat transfer rate of 100 kW for heat exchanger-I. The Kalina energy efficiency is 11.55%, with an exergy efficiency of 24.78%. The exergetic sustainability index is 0.60, with a carbon emission of 4.49 kg per hour and an economic value of electricity produced of $1.57 per hour. A comparison of both cycles is presented.

Keywords

• Thermal energy conversion
• Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC)
• Kalina cycle
• Renewable energy systems

Kaynakça

1. [1] Alrobaian AA. Energy, exergy, economy, and environmental (4E) analysis of a multi-generation system composed of solar-assisted Brayton cycle, Kalina cycle, and absorption chiller. Applied Thermal Engineering 2022; 204: 117988.
2. [2] Ding GC, Peng JI, Mei-Yun GENG. Technical assessment of Multi-generation energy system driven by integrated renewable energy Sources: Energetic, exergetic and optimization approaches. Fuel 2023; 331: 125689.
3. [3] Ebrahimi-Moghadam A, Farzaneh-Gord M, Moghadam AJ, Abu-Hamdeh NH, Lasemi MA, Arabkoohsar A, Alimoradi A. Design and multi-criteria optimisation of a trigeneration district energy system based on gas turbine, Kalina, and ejector cycles: Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental evaluation. Energy conversion and management 2021; 227: 113581.
4. [4] Fang Z, Shang L, Pan Z, Yao X, Ma G, Zhang Z. Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a combined cooling, heating and power system based on organic Rankine and Kalina cycles using liquified natural gas cold energy. Energy Conversion and Management 2021; 238: 114148.
5. [5] Shoaei M, Hajinezhad A, Moosavian SF. Design, energy, exergy, economy, and environment (4E) analysis, and multi-objective optimization of a novel integrated energy system based on solar and geothermal resources. Energy 2023; 280: 128162.
6. [6] Rahmatian M, Ahmadi Boyaghchi F. Exergo-environmental and exergo-economic analyses and multi-criteria optimization of a novel solar-driven CCHP based on Kalina cycle. Energy Equipment and Systems 2016; 4(2): 225-244.
7. [7] Rahmatian M, Ahmadi Boyaghchi F. Exergo-environmental and exergo-economic analyses and multi-criteria optimization of a novel solar-driven CCHP based on Kalina cycle. Energy Equipment and Systems 2016; 4(2): 225-244.
8. [8] Einanlou M, Mehregan M, Hashemian SM. Energy, exergy, exergoeconomic, and environmental (4E) analyses of a novel combined cooling and power system with phosphoric acid fuel cell and Kalina cycle. Applied Thermal Engineering 2023; 221: 119877.

9. [9] Ghorbani B, Ebrahimi A, Moradi M. Exergy, pinch, and reliability analyses of an innovative hybrid system consisting of solar flat plate collectors, Rankine/CO2/Kalina power cycles, and multi-effect desalination system. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 2021; 156: 160-183.
10. [10] Ghorbani B, Ebrahimi A, Rooholamini S, Ziabasharhagh M. Pinch and exergy evaluation of Kalina/Rankine/gas/steam combined power cycles for tri-generation of power, cooling and hot water using liquefied natural gas regasification. Energy Conversion and Management 2020; 223: 113328.
11. [11] Hashemian N, Noorpoor A. Assessment and multi-criteria optimization of a solar and biomass-based multi-generation system: Thermodynamic, exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental aspects. Energy conversion and management 2019; 195: 788-797.
12. [12] Ren J, Qian Z, Fei C, Lu D, Zou Y, Xu C, Liu L. Thermodynamic, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental analysis of a combined cooling and power system for natural gas-biomass dual fuel gas turbine waste heat recovery. Energy 2023; 269: 126676.
13. [13] Nourpour M, Khoshgoftar Manesh MH, Pirozfar A, Delpisheh M. Exergy, exergoeconomic, exergoenvironmental, emergy-based assessment and advanced exergy-based analysis of an integrated solar combined cycle power plant. Energy & Environment 2023; 34(2): 379-406.
14. [14] Tariq S, Safder U, Yoo C. Exergy-based weighted optimization and smart decision-making for renewable energy systems considering economics, reliability, risk, and environmental assessments. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2022; 162: 112445.
15. [15] Rafat E, Babaelahi M. Recovering waste heat of a solar hybrid power plant using a Kalina cycle and desalination unit: A sustainability (emergo-economic and emergo-environmenal) approach. Energy conversion and management 2020; 224: 113394.
16. [16] Rodríguez CEC, Palacio JCE, Venturini OJ, Lora EES, Cobas VM, Dos Santos DM, Gialluca V. Exergetic and economic comparison of ORC and Kalina cycle for low temperature enhanced geothermal system in Brazil. Applied Thermal Engineering 2013: 52(1): 109-119.
17. [17] Elbir A. Thermodynamic Analysis of the Integrated System that Produces Energy by Gradual Expansion from the Waste Heat of the Solid Waste Facility. Hittite Journal of Science and Engineering 2023; 10(4): 339-348.
18. [18] Wakana F, Omarsdottir M, Haraldsson IG, Georgsson LS. Preliminary Study of Binary PowerPlant Feasibility Comparing ORC and Kalina for Low-Temperature Resources in Rusizi Valley, Burundi. Geothermal Training Programme, Reykjavik, 2013.
19. [19] Nasruddin N, Saputra ID, Mentari T, Bardow A, Marcelina O, Berlin S. Exergy, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental optimization of the geothermal binary cycle power plant at Ampallas, West Sulawesi, Indonesia. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress 2020; 19: 100625.
20. [20] Ji-chao Y, Sobhani B. Integration of biomass gasification with a supercritical CO2 and Kalina cycles in a combined heating and power system: a thermodynamic and exergoeconomic analysis. Energy 2021; 222: 119980.
21. [21] Prananto LA, Zaini IN, Mahendranata BI, Juangsa FB, Aziz M, Soelaiman TAF. Use of the Kalina cycle as a bottoming cycle in a geothermal power plant: Case study of the Wayang Windu geothermal power plant. Applied Thermal Engineering 2018; 132: 686-696.
22. [22] Talebizadehsardari P, Ehyaei MA, Ahmadi A, Jamali DH, Shirmohammadi R, Eyvazian A, Rosen MA. Energy, exergy, economic, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental (5E) analyses of a triple cycle with carbon capture. Journal of CO2 Utilization 2020; 41: 101258.
23. [23] Rostamzadeh H, Ebadollahi M, Ghaebi H, Shokri A. Comparative study of two novel micro-CCHP systems based on organic Rankine cycle and Kalina cycle. Energy conversion and management 2019; 183: 210-229.
24. [24] Dinçer İ, Rosen MA. Ekserji: enerji, çevre ve sürdürülebilir kalkınma . Newnes, 2012.
25. [25] Bejan A, Tsatsaronis G, Moran MJ. Thermal design and optimization. John Wiley & Sons, 1995.
26. [26] Sharifishourabi M. Energetic and Exergetic Analysis of a Solar Organic Rankine Cycle with Triple Effect Absorption System (Master's thesis, Eastern Mediterranean University (EMU)-Doğu Akdeniz Üniversitesi (DAÜ)), 2016.
27. [27] Jeswiet J. Kara S. Carbon emissions and CES™ in manufacturing. CIRP annals 2008; 57(1): 17-20.
28. [28] International Energy Agency (IEA). Global Energy & CO2 Data. 2018 [cited 2023 August]; Available from: https://www.iea.org/countries.
29. [29] İRENA REmap 2030 commodity prices, [cited 2023 August]; Available from: https://www.irena.org/media/Files/IRENA/REmap/Methodology/IRENA_REmap_2030_commodity_prices.xlsx?la=en&hash=505B546E4EE80A557363781E83EA1AE83D9FB256
30. [30] Klein SA. Engineering Equation Solver(EES) F-Chart Software, Version 10.835-3D 2020.