Utilization of project support for renewable energy financing in public buildings: A solar carport feasibility example

Abstract

Energy consumption and adverse environmental impacts have increased because of urbanization and intense construction following industrialization. Increasing the number of buildings with green building certification is important and necessary to reduce the negative effects of the construction sector on the environment. One of the significant factors in green building certification scoring systems is the utilization rate of renewable energy sources to meet the building’s energy needs. The generally high costs associated with renewable energy investments often emerge as a restrictive factor, especially in public buildings with limited budgets. It is crucial to utilize project support related to financing to meet the required funding. Conducting a proper feasibility study within the scope of the project application serves as a convincing factor in the project evaluation process and increases the likelihood of project acceptance. This study presents a detailed technical and economic feasibility study conducted for the solar carport planned to be installed as part of the Public and Municipal Renewable Energy Project (KAYEP) carried out by Kocaeli University (KOÜ) Uzunçiftlik Nuh Çimento Vocational School as a step toward becoming a green building. The design and analysis were conducted using PV*SOL software. According to the results of the study, it is projected that the planned 49 kWp photovoltaic (PV) system will generate approximately 55 MWh of electricity annually, resulting in a total income or savings of 183,967₺. It is expected to reduce annual energy costs by 99% and prevent the annual emission of 25,844 kg of CO2 into the environment.

Keywords

• Renewable energy
• Sustainable environment
• Green building certification
• Solar carport
• Feasibility

Kaynakça

1. [1] Şahin O. Dünya ve Türkiye’de ekolojik kent örnekleri değerlendirilmesi. City Health Journal 2022; 3(3): 50-60.
2. [2] Palteki AS. İstanbul’daki kamu hastanelerinin yeşil hastane ölçütlerine uygunluklarının belirlenmesi. Master Thesis, İstanbul University, 2022.
3. [3] Darko A, Chan AP. Critical analysis of green building research trend in construction journals. Habitat International 2016; 57: 53-63.
4. [4] Retzlaff RC. Green buildings and building assessment systems: A new area of interest for planners. Journal of Planning Literature 2009; 24(1): 3-21.
5. [5] Miller D, Doh JH, Panuwatwanich K, Van Oers N. The contribution of structural design to green building rating systems: An industry perspective and comparison of life cycle energy considerations. Sustainable Cities and Society 2015; 16: 39-48.
6. [6] https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2022/06/20220612-1.htm (Access date: March 8, 2024)
7. [7] https://kalkinmaguncesi.izka.org.tr/index.php/2020/04/28/turkiyede-yesil-bina-sertifikasi-ve-ornek- uygulamalar/ (Access date: March 8, 2024)
8. [8] https://tuca.csb.gov.tr/yesil-sertifika-nasil-alinir-i-111736 (Access date: March 8, 2024)

9. [9] https://tuca.csb.gov.tr/iletisim-i-111737 (Access date: March 8, 2024)
10. [10] https://yestr.org/ (Access date: March 10, 2024)
11. [11] https://webdosya.csb.gov.tr/db/meslekihizmetler/menu/yesilbina-degerlendirme kilavuzu_20210611120321.pdf (Access date: March 10, 2024)
12. [12] Efe O, Özdemir R, Işik S, Durmuş İ, Ünver Ü. Assessment of the Yalova University Engineering Faculty Building using the BEST green building certification system. International Journal of Sustainable Energy 2022; 41(11): 1759-1777.
13. [13] Jin Y, Wang L, Xiong Y, Cai H, Li YH, Zhang WJ. Feasibility studies on net zero energy building for climate considering: A case of “All Green House” for Datong, Shanxi, China. Energy and Buildings 2014; 85: 155-164.
14. [14] Phap VM, Nga NT. Feasibility study of rooftop photovoltaic power system for a research institute towards green building in Vietnam. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Energy Web 2020; 7(26): 1-9.
15. [15] Dagdougui H, Minciardi R, Ouammi A, Robba M, Sacile R. Modeling and optimization of a hybrid system for the energy supply of a “Green” building. Energy Conversion and Management 2012; 64: 351-363.
16. [16] Khalid F, El-Emam RS, Hogerwaard J, Dincer I. Techno-economic feasibility of renewable energy based stand-alone energy system for a green house: Case study. Future Cities and Environment 2018; 4(1): 1-9.
17. [17] https://kamuenerji.csb.gov.tr/kayep-projesi-i-110689 (Access date: March 12, 2024)
18. [18] Limem F, Sezen S. Comparative analysis of different photovoltaic simulation software: Case study on analyzing the performance of a 5,1 kWp grid connected photovoltaic system. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi 2021; Ejosat Special Issue (RDCONF): 816-826.
19. [19] https://www.epdk.gov.tr/Detay/Icerik/3-1327/elektrik-faturalarina-esas-tarife-tablolari (Access date: March 14, 2024)
20. [20] Gulkowski S. Specific yield analysis of the rooftop PV systems located in south-eastern Poland. Energies 2022; 15(10): 3666.
21. [21] Müller B, Hardt L, Armbruster A, Kiefer K, Reise C. Yield predictions for photovoltaic power plants: Empirical validation, recent advances and remaining uncertainties. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 2016; 24(4): 570-583.
22. [22] Elamim A, Hartiti B, Haibaoui A, Lfakir A, Thevenin P. Comparative study of photovoltaic solar systems connected to the grid: Performance evaluation and economic analysis. Energy Procedia 2019; 159: 333-339.
23. [23] Boztepe M. Fotovoltaik güç sistemlerinde verimliliği etkileyen parametreler. EMO İzmir Şubesi Aylık Bülteni 2017; 321: 13-17.
24. [24] https://www.elektriktesisatportali.com/fotovoltaik-enerji-sistemleri-yazi-dizisi-31.html (Access date: March 24, 2024).
25. [25] Deniz E. Güneş enerjisi santrallerinde kayıplar. III. Elektrik Tesisat Ulusal Kongre ve Sergisi Bildirileri, İzmir, Türkiye, 2013.