Evaluating passive design measures for residential energy efficiency: A parametric climate-based comparison between London (heating-dominated) and Dubai (cooling-dominated)

Öz

This study presents a comparative analysis of the space heating and cooling requirements of representative residential buildings in London (UK) and Dubai (UAE), reflecting heating-dominated (HD) and cooling-dominated (CD) climates, respectively. Using a simplified Excel-based steady-state framework, five key passive design variables, glazing type, glazing area with orientation, airtightness, thermal mass, and building layout were systematically assessed to quantify their relative impact on annual energy demand. In the HD climate, improving glazing performance from the base-case double-glazed low-e unit (U = 1.8 W/m²K) to triple-glazed configurations (U = 0.8 W/m²K) reduced annual heating demand by approximately 11%, while tightening air-change rates from 0.60 h⁻¹ to 0.25 h⁻¹ achieved the largest reduction of about 40%. Increasing thermal mass yielded a further 8% saving. In the CD climate, adopting low-e sputtered silver solar-control glazing (g = 0.34) lowered cooling demand by around 38%, and enhanced airtightness provided an additional 8% reduction. Conversely, expanding south- and west-facing glazing areas increased cooling loads by up to 35%. The results indicate that identical design strategies can yield contrasting outcomes across climates. This study offers architects a transparent and data-driven way to evaluate climate-sensitive passive design alternatives early in the design process. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Passive design
• Residential energy efficiency
• Cooling-dominated climate
• Heating-dominated climate

Kaynakça

1. [1] Gupta V, Ded C. Envelope design for low-energy buildings in the tropics: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2023; 186: 113650.
2. [2] Chou JS, Bui DK. Modeling heating and cooling loads by artificial intelligence for energy-efficient building design. Energy and Buildings 2014; 82: 437–446.
3. [3] Jelle BP, Gustavsen A, Uvsløkk S. The path to high-performance thermal building insulation materials and solutions of tomorrow. Journal of Building Physics 2010; 34(2): 99–123.
4. [4] Özkan DB, Onan C. Optimization of insulation thickness for different glazing areas in buildings for various climatic regions in Turkey. Applied Energy 2011; 88: 1331–1342.
5. [5] Berge A, Johansson PÄR. Literature review of high-performance thermal insulation. SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden Report 2012.
6. [6] Eddib F, Lamrani MA. Effect of thermal insulators on the thermal and energetic performance of the envelope of a house located in Marrakesh. Alexandria Engineering Journal 2019; 58(3): 937–944.
7. [7] Bostancioglu E. Effect of insulation thickness on energy consumption for different shaped buildings. Collaboration and Integration in Construction, Engineering, Management and Technology: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Construction in the 21st Century, London, UK, 2019, pp. 299–303.
8. [8] Baş H, Kazanasmaz T. Hybrid-model simulations to equilibrate energy demand and daylight autonomy as a function of window-to-wall ratio and orientation for a perimeter office in Izmir. Megaron 2020; 15(4): 537–552.

9. [9] Kaasalainen T, Mäkinen A, Lehtinen T, Moisio M, Vinha J. Architectural window design and energy efficiency: Impacts on heating, cooling, and lighting needs in Finnish climates. Journal of Building Engineering 2020; 27: 100996.
10. [10] Yao R, Li B, Steemers K, Short A. Assessing the natural ventilation cooling potential of office buildings in different climate zones in China. Renewable Energy 2009; 34: 2697–2705.
11. [11] Tan Z, Deng X. Assessment of natural ventilation potential for residential buildings across different climate zones in Australia. Atmosphere 2017; 8(3): 1–17.
12. [12] Moreno-Rangel A. Passivhaus. Encyclopedia 2020; 1(1): 20–29.
13. [13] Marincu C, Dan D, Moga L. Investigating the influence of building shape and insulation thickness on energy efficiency of buildings. Energy for Sustainable Development 2024; 79: 101384.
14. [14] Friess WA, Rakhshan K. A review of passive envelope measures for improved building energy efficiency in the UAE. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2017; 72: 485–496.
15. [15] Lam JC, Wan KK, Tsang CL, Yang L. Building energy efficiency in different climates. Energy Conversion and Management 2008; 49(8): 2354–2366.
16. [16] Soleimani-Mohseni M, Nair G, Hasselrot R. Energy simulation for a high-rise building using IDA ICE: Investigations in different climates. Building Simulation 2016; 9(6): 629–640.
17. [17] Elnabawi MH, Saber E, Bande L. Passive building energy saving: Building envelope retrofitting measures to reduce cooling requirements for a residential building in an arid climate. Sustainability 2024; 16(2): 626.
18. [18] Givoni B. Climate considerations in building and urban design. John Wiley & Sons, New York, US, 1998.
19. [19] Santamouris M, Synnefa A, Karlessi T. Using advanced cool materials in the urban built environment to mitigate heat islands and improve thermal comfort conditions. Solar Energy 2010; 85(12): 3085–3102.
20. [20] Elnabawi M, Radhi H, Asif M. Thermal and energy performance of residential buildings under hot climate conditions: Parametric evaluation of glazing and envelope design variables. Energy and Buildings 2024; 305: 113035.
21. [21] Beattie S, Hensen JLM. Transparency and reproducibility in building performance simulation: A review. Building and Environment 2021; 204: 108122.
22. [22] Passive House Institute (PHI). Passive House Planning Package (PHPP): Energy balance and design tool for efficient buildings. Passive House Institute, Darmstadt, Germany, 2012.
23. [23] Cemesova A. PassivBIM: Enhancing interoperability between BIM and passive house planning. Automation in Construction 2015; 57: 78–90.
24. [24] Hopfe C, McLeod R. The Passivhaus Designer’s Manual: A technical guide to low and zero energy buildings. Routledge, London, UK, 2015.
25. [25] Franchini G, Brumana G, Perdichizzi A. Monitored performance of the first energy+ autonomous building in Dubai. Energy and Buildings 2019; 205: 109545.
26. [26] Palmer J, Cooper I, Cheng V, Summerton P, et al. Great Britain’s Housing Energy Fact File. Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC), UK, 2011.
27. [27] Roos A, Karlsson B. Optical and thermal characterization of multiple glazed windows with low U-values. Solar Energy 1994; 52(4): 315–325.
28. [28] Gupta SK, Chanda PR, Biswas A. A 2E: Energy and environment performance of an optimized vernacular house for passive cooling—Case of North-East India. Building and Environment 2023; 229: 109909.
29. [29] Li X, Wu Y. A review of complex window-glazing systems for building energy saving and daylight comfort: Glazing technologies and their building performance prediction. Journal of Building Physics 2025; 48(4): 496–540.
30. [30] Aguilar-Santana JL, Jarimi H, Velasco-Carrasco M, Riffat S. Review on window-glazing technologies and future prospects. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies 2020; 15(1): 112–120.
31. [31] Building Research Establishment (BRE). Guide to Part L of the Building Regulations—conservation of fuel and power. National Building Specification (NBS), London, UK, 2010.
32. [32] Government of Dubai. Dubai Building Code (DBC). Dubai Municipality, Dubai, UAE, 2021.
33. [33] Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers (CIBSE). CIBSE Guide A: Environmental Design. 8th ed. CIBSE Publications, London, UK, 2015.
34. [34] American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE). ASHRAE Handbook—Fundamentals. ASHRAE, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2017.
35. [35] European Committee for Standardization (CEN). EN 16798-1:2019—Energy performance of buildings—indoor environmental input parameters for design and assessment of energy performance of buildings addressing indoor air quality, thermal environment, lighting and acoustics. CEN, Brussels, Belgium, 2019.
36. [36] Building Research Establishment (BRE). Foundations: depths and design guidance for low-rise dwellings. BRE Digest. Building Research Establishment, Garston, UK, 2016.
37. [37] National House Building Council (NHBC). Foundations and ground engineering—technical standards. NHBC, Milton Keynes, UK, 2019.
38. [38] Kusuda T, Achenbach PR. Earth temperature and thermal diffusivity at selected stations in the United States. ASHRAE Transactions 1965; 71: 61–75.
39. [39] Moreno-Rangel A, Sharpe T, Musau F, McGill G. Indoor air quality in Passivhaus dwellings in the UK: Post occupancy evaluation of monitored dwellings. Building and Environment 2019; 156: 189–202.
40. [40] Al-Amin M, Al-Awadhi E, Jaffal I. Analysis of subsurface temperature variations in arid soils of the United Arab Emirates. Energies 2022; 15(19): 7268.
41. [41] Al-Awadhi E, Jaffal I. Thermal properties of desert soil in arid environments. Geothermics 2019; 82: 120–129.