Numerical assessment of thermohydraulic performance in pipes with different arrangements of delta winglet pairs via the GEKO turbulence model

Öz

This study systematically investigates the effect of varying the number (N) of Delta Winglet Pairs (DWPs) under both constant (CFPA) and non-constant (NCFPA) total frontal projection areas on the thermal–hydraulic performance of tubular heat exchangers. Prior to these investigations, a detailed evaluation of the GEneralized K-Omega (GEKO) turbulence model is performed to ensure its reliability for the present study. The Nusselt number (Nu) and Darcy friction factor (f) of a tubular domain fitted with delta winglet (DW) type vortex generators (VGs) are numerically investigated within Re=5000-25000. The mean absolute deviations of 4.80%, 1.85% and 4.99% are attained with respect to the NuExp., fExp. and TEFExp. respectively. The free parameters are adjusted to C_SEP=1.75 and the corresponding 〖 C〗_MIXCOR (GEKO-1.75). Besides that, the validation of smooth pipe is also carried out and yields an average absolute deviations of 5.42% and 0.85% in comparison to the Dittus-Boelter and Petukhov correlation equations, respectively, with optimized free parameters are set to C_NW=-1.18-2,C_(NW-SUB)=1.7-2.5,C_SEP=1. Based on the analysis carried out within the scope of the NCFPA approach, Thermal Enhancement Factors (TEF) exceeds unity for most cases, with the highest values of 1.28, 1.26, 1.22, and 1.17 at Re=5000 for N=3-6, respectively, indicating the strong contribution of longitudinal vortices at lower Reynolds numbers. In the CFPA approach, although friction increased notably for N=3S, the heat transfer enhancement outweighs the friction penalty, yielding TEF of 1.18 at Re=5000 and ≈1.00 at Re=25000. Overall, the NCFPA approach showed a more pronounced TEF enhancement compared to CFPA, confirming the strong influence of DWP number and arrangement on thermal performance. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• GEKO turbulence model
• Vortex generator
• Thermal enhancement factor
• Numerical analysis

Kaynakça

1. [1] Sheikholeslami M, Gorji-Bandpy M, Ganji DD. Review of heat transfer enhancement methods: focus on passive methods using swirl flow devices. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2015; 49: 444-469.
2. [2] Bergles AE. ExHFT for fourth generation heat transfer technology. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 2002; 26: 335-344.
3. [3] Liu S, Sakr M. A comprehensive review on passive heat transfer enhancements in pipe exchangers. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2013; 19: 64-81.
4. [4] Bhattacharyya S, Vishwakarma DK, Srinivasan A, Soni MK, Goel V, Sharifpur M, et al. Thermal performance enhancement in heat exchangers using active and passive techniques: a detailed review. J Therm Anal Calorim 2022; 147: 9229-9281.
5. [5] Min C, Qi C, Kong X, Dong J. Experimental study of rectangular channel with modified rectangular longitudinal vortex generators. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2010; 53: 3023-3029.
6. [6] Xu Z, Han Z, Wang J, Liu Z. The characteristics of heat transfer and flow resistance in a rectangular channel with vortex generators. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2018; 116: 61-72.
7. [7] Fiebig M. Vortices, generators and heat transfer. Chem Eng Res Des 1998; 76: 108-123.
8. [8] Tian LT, He YL, Lei YG, Tao WQ. Numerical study of fluid flow and heat transfer in a flat-plate channel with longitudinal vortex generators by applying field synergy principle analysis. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 2009; 36: 111-120.

9. [9] Jacobi AM, Shah RK. Heat transfer surface enhancement through the use of longitudinal vortices: a review of recent progress. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 1995; 11: 295-309.
10. [10] Tang LH, Chu WX, Ahmed N, Zeng M. A new configuration of winglet longitudinal vortex generator to enhance heat transfer in a rectangular channel. Appl Therm Eng 2016; 104: 74-84.
11. [11] Fiebig M. Vortices and heat transfer. ZAMM Zeitschrift Fur Angew Math Und Mech 1997; 77: 3-18.
12. [12] Sohankar A. Heat transfer augmentation in a rectangular channel with a vee-shaped vortex generator. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 2007; 28: 306-317.
13. [13] Wang J, Fu T, Zeng L, Lien FS, Deng X, Zhang F. Heat transfer performance of internal flow by inserting punched and non-punched vortex generators. Int J Therm Sci 2023; 186.
14. [14] Wang J, Fu T, Zeng L, Lien FS, Chen G. Thermal-hydraulic performance in a tube with punched delta winglets inserts in turbulent flow. Int J Therm Sci 2022; 172.
15. [15] Liu HL, Li H, He YL, Chen ZT. Heat transfer and flow characteristics in a circular tube fitted with rectangular winglet vortex generators. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2018; 126: 989-1006.
16. [16] Wu X, Fu T, Wang J, Zeng L, Zhang F. A comparative study of fluid flow and heat transfer in the tube with multi-V-winglets vortex generators. Appl Therm Eng 2024; 236.
17. [17] Sun Z, Zhang K, Li W, Chen Q, Zheng N. Investigations of the turbulent thermal-hydraulic performance in circular heat exchanger tubes with multiple rectangular winglet vortex generators. Appl Therm Eng 2020; 168.
18. [18] Sun Z, Chen Q, Zheng N. Experimental and numerical studies of intensified turbulent heat transfer in round pipes with curved wing vortex generators. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2021; 180.
19. [19] Xu Y, Islam MD, Kharoua N. Numerical study of winglets vortex generator effects on thermal performance in a circular pipe. Int J Therm Sci 2017; 112: 304-317.
20. [20] Liang G, Islam MD, Kharoua N, Simmons R. Numerical study of heat transfer and flow behavior in a circular tube fitted with varying arrays of winglet vortex generators. Int J Therm Sci 2018; 134: 54-65.
21. [21] Promvonge P, Promthaisong P, Skullong S. Experimental and numerical heat transfer study of turbulent tube flow through discrete V-winglets. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2020; 151.
22. [22] Zhang K, Sun Z, Zheng N, Chen Q. Effects of the configuration of winglet vortex generators on turbulent heat transfer enhancement in circular tubes. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2020; 157.
23. [23] M MS, Fernandes DV. Numerical investigation of heat transfer and friction factor characteristics of circular tube fitted with an array of semi-elliptical vortex generator inserts. Cogent Eng 2021; 8.
24. [24] Min C, Li H, Gao X, Wang K, Xie L. Numerical investigation of convective heat transfer enhancement by a combination of vortex generator and in-tube inserts. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 2021; 127: 105490.
25. [25] Jayranaiwachira N, Promvonge P, Promthaisong P, Nakhchi ME, Skullong S. Heat transfer analysis in a tube contained with louver-punched triangular baffles. Results Eng 2024; 22: 102276.
26. [26] Habchi C, Russeil S, Bougeard D, Harion JL, Lemenand T, Della Valle D, et al. Enhancing heat transfer in vortex generator-type multifunctional heat exchangers. Appl Therm Eng 2012; 38: 14-25.
27. [27] Ke Z, Chen CL, Li K, Wang S, Chen CH. Vortex dynamics and heat transfer of longitudinal vortex generators in a rectangular channel. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2019; 132: 871-885.
28. [28] Joardar A, Jacobi AM. Impact of leading edge delta-wing vortex generators on the thermal performance of a flat tube, louvered-fin compact heat exchanger. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2005; 48: 1480-1493.
29. [29] Incropera FP, DeWitt DP. Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer. 5th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2002.
30. [30] Zhai C, Islam MD, Simmons R, Barsoum I. Heat transfer augmentation in a circular tube with delta winglet vortex generator pairs. Int J Therm Sci 2019; 140: 480-490.
31. [31] Fiebig M. Embedded vortices in internal flow: heat transfer and pressure loss enhancement. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 1995; 16: 376-388.
32. [32] Kareem ZS, Mohd Jaafar MN, Lazim TM, Abdullah S, Abdulwahid AF. Passive heat transfer enhancement review in corrugation. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 2015; 68: 22-38.
33. [33] Versteeg HK, Malalasekera W. An introduction to computational fluid dynamics: The finite volume method. 2nd ed. Pearson Education; 2007.
34. [34] Menter FR, Lechner R, Matyushenko A. Best practice: Generalized k-ω two-equation turbulence model in ANSYS CFD (GEKO). ANSYS Inc; 2019.
35. [35] Hazer N. Numerical investigation of the thermal performance of innovative vortex generator designs placed on the heated surface in a pipe with the GEKO turbulence model [Master's thesis]. Yozgat Bozok University; 2025.
36. [36] Ali S, Habchi C, Zaytoun H, Khaled M, Dbouk T. Surrogate-based optimization of the attack and inclination angles of a delta winglet pair vortex generator in turbulent channel flow. Int J Thermofluids 2023; 20: 100473.
37. [37] Zheng N, Zhang K, Chen Q, Sun Z. Novel self-join winglet vortex generators for enhanced heat transfer of turbulent airflow in round tubes. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 2022; 130: 105806.
38. [38] Dittus FW, Boelter LMK. Heat transfer in automobile radiators of the tubular type. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 1985; 12: 3-22.
39. [39] Petukhov BS. Heat transfer and friction in turbulent pipe flow with variable physical properties. Adv Heat Transf 1970; 6: 503-564.