Araştırma Makalesi

Design, simulation, and comparative evaluation of charging strategies for electric vehicles

Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1 17 Mart 2026
PDF İndir
EN

Design, simulation, and comparative evaluation of charging strategies for electric vehicles

Öz

Efficient and reliable charging strategies are essential for improving the performance, lifetime, and safety of modern battery energy storage systems, particularly under diverse operating conditions. This study presents a systematic analysis and comparative evaluation of three representative charging approaches: the Constant-Current (CC) method, the Pulse Charging method, and the Multistage Constant-Current (MSCC) method, each investigated at different C-rates. The mathematical principles and operational mechanisms of these methods are first introduced, followed by the development of a simulation model. Performance evaluation is conducted in terms of critical indicators, including temperature rise, charging time, and terminal voltage dynamics. The results indicate that the MSCC method achieves a more favorable balance between charging efficiency and thermal management compared to conventional techniques. Furthermore, the Taguchi optimization method is employed to determine the optimal charging parameters within the MSCC framework, thereby enhancing overall performance and safety. These findings underscore the potential of combining advanced charging strategies with systematic optimization techniques to improve battery management systems and support the development of next-generation energy storage technologies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. [1] Rai R, Gaglani M, Das S, and Panigrahi T, “Multi-level constant current based fast li-ion battery charging scheme with lms based online state of charge estimation,” 2020.
  2. [2] Duru KK, Karra C, Venkatachalam P, Betha SA, Anish Madhavan A, and Kalluri S, “Critical insights into fast charging techniques for lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles,” IEEE Transactions on Device and Materials Reliability, 2021, 21(1): 137–152.
  3. [3] I. Energy Agency, “Global ev outlook 2024 moving towards increased affordability,” 2024. [Online]. Available: www.iea.org
  4. [4] Serhan HA and Ahmed EM, “Effect of the different charging techniques on battery life-time: review,” 2018.
  5. [5] Usman Tahir M, Sangwongwanich A, Stroe DI, and Blaabjerg F, “The effect of multi-stage constant current charging on lithium-ion battery’s performance,” in CPE-POWERENG 2023 - 17th IEEE International Conference on Compatibility, Power Electronics and Power Engineering, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2023.
  6. [6] N SVK and V SSK, “Improved charging technique for reducing the charging time in nickel manganese cobalt type lithium-ion batteries,” in 2024 IEEE International Conference on Electrical Systems for Aircraft, Railway, Ship Propulsion and Road Vehicles and International Transportation Electrification Conference, ESARS-ITEC 2024, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2024.
  7. [7] Gaglani M, Rai R, and Das S, Implementation of multilevel battery charging scheme for lithium-ion batteries. IEEE, 2019.
  8. [8] Malla AB and Myneni H, “Analysis of different charging methods of batteries for ev applications with charge equalization,” in 2023 IEEE IAS Global Conference on Renewable Energy and Hydrogen Technologies, GlobConHT 2023, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2023; 1–6.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Elektrik Enerjisi Depolama

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

17 Mart 2026

Gönderilme Tarihi

26 Kasım 2025

Kabul Tarihi

11 Ocak 2026

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2026 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Görür, F., & Yalman, Y. (2026). Design, simulation, and comparative evaluation of charging strategies for electric vehicles. International Journal of Energy Studies, 11(1), 317-337. https://doi.org/10.58559/ijes.1830471
AMA
1.Görür F, Yalman Y. Design, simulation, and comparative evaluation of charging strategies for electric vehicles. International Journal of Energy Studies. 2026;11(1):317-337. doi:10.58559/ijes.1830471
Chicago
Görür, Furkan, ve Yunus Yalman. 2026. “Design, simulation, and comparative evaluation of charging strategies for electric vehicles”. International Journal of Energy Studies 11 (1): 317-37. https://doi.org/10.58559/ijes.1830471.
EndNote
Görür F, Yalman Y (01 Mart 2026) Design, simulation, and comparative evaluation of charging strategies for electric vehicles. International Journal of Energy Studies 11 1 317–337.
IEEE
[1]F. Görür ve Y. Yalman, “Design, simulation, and comparative evaluation of charging strategies for electric vehicles”, International Journal of Energy Studies, c. 11, sy 1, ss. 317–337, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.58559/ijes.1830471.
ISNAD
Görür, Furkan - Yalman, Yunus. “Design, simulation, and comparative evaluation of charging strategies for electric vehicles”. International Journal of Energy Studies 11/1 (01 Mart 2026): 317-337. https://doi.org/10.58559/ijes.1830471.
JAMA
1.Görür F, Yalman Y. Design, simulation, and comparative evaluation of charging strategies for electric vehicles. International Journal of Energy Studies. 2026;11:317–337.
MLA
Görür, Furkan, ve Yunus Yalman. “Design, simulation, and comparative evaluation of charging strategies for electric vehicles”. International Journal of Energy Studies, c. 11, sy 1, Mart 2026, ss. 317-3, doi:10.58559/ijes.1830471.
Vancouver
1.Furkan Görür, Yunus Yalman. Design, simulation, and comparative evaluation of charging strategies for electric vehicles. International Journal of Energy Studies. 01 Mart 2026;11(1):317-3. doi:10.58559/ijes.1830471