Pressure retarded osmosis in the renewable energy transition: Opportunities, challenges, and cost analysis for coastal river systems in Türkiye

Öz

Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO) has emerged as a promising renewable energy technology due to its sustainability, continuous operation capability, and potential to provide baseload power. Unlike intermittent renewable energy sources such as wind and solar, PRO utilizes the salinity gradient between freshwater and seawater to generate electricity without fuel consumption or direct greenhouse gas emissions, making it an environmentally friendly energy option. In recent years, PRO technology has advanced from laborator scale studies to pilot scale projects, with several initiatives worldwide moving toward commercial scale deployment. This progress highlights the growing interest in PRO as a complementary component of future low carbon energy systems. Although no PRO facilities are currently in operation in Türkiye, the country has significant potential for PRO development, particularly along rivers discharging into the Aegean and Mediterranean Seas, where strong salinity gradients exist. In this study, the Ceyhan River was identified as one of the most suitable locations for a PRO power plant. The Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) of the proposed facility was estimated at 0.238 USD/kWh. While this value is consistent with existing literature, it remains considerably higher than that of established renewable energy technologies such as hydropower, wind, and solar energy. The main challenges hindering the widespread adoption of PRO include high capital costs, limited membrane lifespan, low membrane permeability, and significant internal energy consumption. Nevertheless, ongoing advancements in membrane technology and system optimization indicate that PRO could become a viable and competitive renewable energy option in the near future, both in Türkiye and globally.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Pressure retarded osmosis (PRO)
• Renewable energy
• Hydropower
• LCOE

Kaynakça

1. [1] Logan B, Elimelech M. Membrane-based processes for sustainable power generation using water. Nature 2012; 488: 313-319.
2. [2] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/aug/25/japan-osmotic-power-plant-fukuoka
3. [3] https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/SYGM/Haber/753/Turkiye-Su-Kaynaklari-Haritasi-Yayinda
4. [4] Matsuyama K, Makabe R, Ueyama T, Sakai H, Saito K, Okumura T, Hayashi H, Tanioka A. Power generation system based on pressure retarded osmosis with a commercially-available hollow fiber PRO membrane module using seawater and freshwater. Desalination 2021; 499 (114805).
5. [5] Maisonneuve J, Laflamme CB, Pillay P. Experimental investigation of pressure retarded osmosis for renewable energy conversion: Towards increased net power. Applied Energy 2016; 164: 425-435.
6. [6] Einarsson SJ, Wu B. Thermal associated pressure-retarded osmosis processes for energy production: A review. Science of The Total Environment 2021; 757(143731).
7. [7] Touati K, Rahaman S. Viability of pressure-retarded osmosis for harvesting energy from salinity gradients. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2020; 131 (109999).
8. [8] Touati K, Tadeo F. Green energy generation by pressure retarded osmosis: State of the art and technical advancement-review. International Journal of Green Energy 2017; 14(4): 337-360.

9. [9] Kim J, Jeong K, Park MJ, Shon HK, Kim JH. Recent Advances in Osmotic Energy Generation via Pressure-Retarded Osmosis (PRO): A Review. Energies 2015; 8(10): 11821-11845.
10. [10] AL-Musawi OAH, Mohammad AW, Mahood HB et al. Generating Osmotic Power Using Waste Effluents for Pressure-Retarded Osmosis. Arab J Sci 2025; 50: 4295-4311.
11. [11] Touati K, Mulligan CN. Energetic and techno-economic analysis of harvesting energy from low-grade heat by thermo-osmotic energy conversion. Energy Conversion and Management 2025; 339 (119949).
12. [12] Aktij SA, Firouzjaei MD, Pilevar M, Asad A, Rahimpour A, Elliott M, Soares JBP, Sadrzadeh M. Enhancing sustainable Energy production through co-polyamide membranes for improved pressure-retarded osmosis performance and environmental impact: synthesis and life cycle analysis. Green Chemistry 2025; 3.
13. [13] Li D. Developing novel pressure-retarded osmosis (PRO) systems for renewable energy harvesting and storage. 2025. (Doctoral dissertation, Nanyang Technological University).
14. [14] Chen Y, Chi H, Ji Z, Li G, Gou L. Optimal control and operation strategy for an integrated photovoltaic/thermal-pressure retarded osmosis-solid oxide fuel cell system. Renewable Energy 2025; 254 (123749).
15. [15] Touati K, Nouri G, Mulligan CN. Assessing process feasibility of salinity gradient systems through maximum extractable and net energy outputs. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2025; 13(5).
16. [16] Yu C, Jia F, Chen D et al. Biopolymer Membranes for Osmotic Power Generation in Bionic Applications. Adv. Mater. 2025; 37 (36).
17. [17] Pakdaman S, Nouri G, Mulligan CN, Nasiri F. Integration of Membrane-Based Pretreatment Methods with Pressure-Retarded Osmosis for Performance Enhancement: A Review. Materials 2025; 18(5).
18. [18] Suárez-Alfonso D, Ruiz-García A, Khayet M. Optimization of energy extraction from salinity gradient using full-scale pressure retarded osmosis systems with hollow fiber membrane modules. Renewable Energy 2026; 256 (124344).
19. [19] Guan L, Richter CP, Wu B. Effect of CaCO3 crystal morphology on osmosis membrane performance during integration of direct air capture with pressure retarded osmosis process. Separation and Purification Technology 2025; 376 (133940).
20. [20] Menon SA. Exploring the Potential of Pressure Retarded Osmosis: A Review on Case-Based Analysis of Energy Recovery Technologies. Jurnal Sosial Teknologi 2025; 5(5): 1690–1702.
21. [21] Ruiz-Navas D, Quiñones-Bolaños E, Sharqawy MH. Modified Solution–Diffusion Model Incorporating Rotational Kinetic Energy in Pressure Retarded Osmosis. Applied Sciences 2025; 15(3).
22. [22] Tan JX, Ahmad AL, Li M, Lau WJ, Ab Rahim MH, Fimbres Weihs GA, Liang YY. Modeling water flux in forward osmosis and pressure retarded osmosis accounting for reverse solute flux. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2025: 13 (115871).
23. [23] Marx OP, Gasser I. Modelling, simulation and optimisation of seawater reverse osmosis – pressure-retarded osmosis (SWRO–PRO) hybrid units for seawater desalination. J Eng Math 2025; 154 (4).
24. [24] Chong YK, Liang YY. Modeling osmotic membrane processes without pressure and porosity simplifications. Journal of Water Process Engineering 2025; 70 (106921).
25. [25] Isla-Cabaraban MT, Iligan IV, Albia R, Maderal C, Navarro J, & Cabaraban GMS. Energetic and economic viability of full-scale pressure retarded osmosis for blue power generation in the Philippines. Engineering Innovations 2026; 16: 37-61.
26. [26] Kim S, Jang J, Lim J, Lee D, Kim J, Kim J. Design and optimization of hybrid seawater reverse osmosis–solar-driven desalination–pressure retarded osmosis system for energy efficient desalination maximizing economic potential. Water Research 2025; 274 (123066).
27. [27] Chapuis N, Bocquet L. Boosting large scale capacitive harvesting of osmotic power by dynamic matching of ion exchange kinetics. Sustainable Energy Fuels 2025; 9(8): 2087-2097.
28. [28] Devandran T. Leveraging Blue Energy for Sustainable Power Generation at Seaports. Journal of Maritime Logistics 2025; 5(2).
29. [29] Ali U, Tariq S, Kim S, Safder U, Yoo C. Techno-economic assessment of a demand-responsive RO-PRO superstructure for sustainable saline wastewater treatment. Desalination 2026; 622 (119797).
30. [30] Ng WH, Liang YY, Fimbres Weihs GA. Towards energy-efficient RO-PRO systems: Impact of PRO spiral wound membrane module design on power density and energy consumption. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2025; 13 (5).
31. [31] Marx OP, Gasser I. Modelling, simulation and optimisation of seawater reverse osmosis – pressure-retarded osmosis (SWRO–PRO) hybrid units for seawater desalination. J Eng Math 2025; 154 (4).
32. [32] AL-Musawi OAH, Mohammad AW, Mahood HB, Mahmoudi E, Ang, WL, Kadhum AAH. Energy comparison and cost estimation of pressure-retarded osmosis using spiral wound membrane. Desalination and Water Treatment 2024; 320 (100732).
33. [33] Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2024, IRENA, International Renewable Energy Agency, 2025.
34. [34] Choi Y, Kim SH, Lee S. Comparison of performance and economics of reverse osmosis, membrane distillation, and pressure retarded osmosis hybrid systems. Desalination and Water Treatment 2017; 77: 19-29.
35. [35] Racha SM, Mitra S, Shown B, Mandal S, Das AK. Emerging membrane technologies for low-cost desalination. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Water Management 2024; 177 (2): 112–122.
36. [36] Wan CF, Chung TS. Techno-economic evaluation of various RO+PRO and RO+FO integrated processes. Applied Energy 2018; 212: 1038-1050.
37. [37] Caldera U, Breyer C. Learning curve for seawater reverse osmosis desalination plants: Capital cost trend of the past, present and future. Water Resources Research 2017; 53 (12): 10523-10538.
38. [38] Usman HS, Touati K, Rahaman S. An economic evaluation of renewable energy-powered membrane distillation for desalination of brackish water. Renewable Energy 2021; 169: 1294-1304.
39. [39] Ojo OE, Oludolapo OA. Cost–Benefit and Market Viability Analysis of Metals and Salts Recovery from SWRO Brine Compared with Terrestrial Mining and Traditional Chemical Production Methods. Water 2025; 17(19): 2855.
40. [40] Lugo A, Mejía-Saucedo C, Senanayake PS, Stoll Z, Sitterley K, Wang H, Kota K, Kuravi S, Fthenakis V, Kurup P, et al. Technical, Economic, Energetic, and Environmental Evaluation of Pretreatment Strategies for Scaling Control in Brackish Water Desalination Brine Treatment. Water 2025; 17(5):708.